I'm gonna have to jump on board the wagon with that being a bad figure, got some others
Isaac Send a noteboard - 14/04/2011 07:33:14 PM
I've only got 2007 CBO data, but I think page 6 from the report linked below is probably more trustworthy on this score, I'm sure the values changed but not that much, and that has the top 1% paying 28.1% of all federal taxes and 39.5% of all income taxes, going to (for income taxes) 61% for top 5%, 73% for the top 10%, and the top quintile being 86%, top quintile also doing 69% of all federal taxes and having an avg pre-tax household income of 265k, this is all by household, no adjustments for household size. Next Quintile does another 12.7% of income taxes (leaving 1.3% I guess for the remaining 60% of households) and 16.5% of all federal taxes leaving 14.4% of federal tax revenues for the lower 60% of households to generate, that appears to be boots balls and all but obviously wouldn't include things like gas tax. Again that's on page 6, 2006 data on page 7, if there's '08 data I don't know where it is and I doubt there's anything more recent. I won't claim the CBO to be the source of all that is pure and true and objective but I don't think we can do much better.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 14/04/2011 at 07:48:47 PM
How can anyone seriously support Obama's budget proposals?
14/04/2011 02:49:30 PM
- 1090 Views
I agree with your overall point but I do question one of your facts
14/04/2011 03:25:25 PM
- 577 Views
Using IRS data for 2008: (most recent year for which data is available)
14/04/2011 03:45:20 PM
- 597 Views
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that.
14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM
- 460 Views
I'm gonna have to jump on board the wagon with that being a bad figure, got some others
14/04/2011 07:33:14 PM
- 629 Views
Data: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/08in31mt.xls *NM*
14/04/2011 08:32:42 PM
- 238 Views
That's a breakdown of who modifies their returns and how it affects revenue.
14/04/2011 09:15:21 PM
- 452 Views
I believe you are questioning one of my definitions, not one of my facts.
14/04/2011 04:36:35 PM
- 512 Views
No matter how you define it I think it would be hard to call the top 5% middle class
14/04/2011 05:03:33 PM
- 524 Views
What a load of crap!
14/04/2011 03:49:29 PM
- 673 Views
Yes, your response is a load of crap.
14/04/2011 04:55:20 PM
- 574 Views
Re: Yes, your response is a load of crap.
14/04/2011 05:13:14 PM
- 654 Views
This is our first war without a tax increase.
14/04/2011 06:05:43 PM
- 576 Views
Er, check facts
14/04/2011 05:04:02 PM
- 703 Views
Yeah, lets fact check
14/04/2011 05:43:34 PM
- 555 Views
You understand you're actually supposed to cite data for a fact check right?
14/04/2011 06:38:22 PM
- 717 Views
I'm not sure thats entirely right
14/04/2011 05:51:18 PM
- 733 Views
What about the farm subsidies and the military?
15/04/2011 04:54:54 PM
- 543 Views
Cutting the military isn't enough
16/04/2011 04:27:11 AM
- 483 Views
Defense is 60% of the discretionary budget as well, so it's more like 26% overall. Just sayin'. *NM*
16/04/2011 04:53:30 AM
- 243 Views