Active Users:1136 Time:23/11/2024 02:29:26 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that. Tom Send a noteboard - 14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM
I'm not sure what spreadsheet you were looking at but those numbers are so far out of the ballpark as to be prima facie suspect.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
How can anyone seriously support Obama's budget proposals? Tom - 14/04/2011 02:49:30 PM 1090 Views
I agree with your overall point but I do question one of your facts random thoughts - 14/04/2011 03:25:25 PM 579 Views
Using IRS data for 2008: (most recent year for which data is available) Macharius - 14/04/2011 03:45:20 PM 597 Views
those numbers sem high. What is your source? *NM* random thoughts - 14/04/2011 05:05:26 PM 231 Views
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that. Tom - 14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM 462 Views
I'm gonna have to jump on board the wagon with that being a bad figure, got some others Isaac - 14/04/2011 07:33:14 PM 629 Views
Some other income data for historical perspective, again CBO Isaac - 14/04/2011 07:45:13 PM 568 Views
Data: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/08in31mt.xls *NM* Macharius - 14/04/2011 08:32:42 PM 238 Views
That's a breakdown of who modifies their returns and how it affects revenue. Tom - 14/04/2011 09:15:21 PM 454 Views
I see. Well, nevermind then. *NM* Macharius - 15/04/2011 01:37:13 PM 228 Views
I believe you are questioning one of my definitions, not one of my facts. Tom - 14/04/2011 04:36:35 PM 512 Views
No matter how you define it I think it would be hard to call the top 5% middle class random thoughts - 14/04/2011 05:03:33 PM 524 Views
A family making $150,000 is not middle class? Tom - 14/04/2011 06:07:07 PM 533 Views
reading what you said again random thoughts - 14/04/2011 06:37:54 PM 497 Views
What a load of crap! Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 03:49:29 PM 674 Views
Yes, your response is a load of crap. Tom - 14/04/2011 04:55:20 PM 574 Views
Re: Yes, your response is a load of crap. Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 05:13:14 PM 654 Views
This is our first war without a tax increase. Tom - 14/04/2011 06:05:43 PM 576 Views
"Artful Dodgers" Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 06:30:58 PM 515 Views
Not giving me the information I need Tom - 14/04/2011 09:33:36 PM 503 Views
Er, check facts Isaac - 14/04/2011 05:04:02 PM 703 Views
Yeah, lets fact check Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 05:43:34 PM 555 Views
You understand you're actually supposed to cite data for a fact check right? Isaac - 14/04/2011 06:38:22 PM 717 Views
I'm not sure thats entirely right MalkierKnight - 14/04/2011 05:51:18 PM 733 Views
You basically just said what I said. How am I not right? Tom - 14/04/2011 05:56:08 PM 512 Views
Re: You basically just said what I said. How am I not right? MalkierKnight - 15/04/2011 02:48:07 AM 629 Views
A response Roland00 - 14/04/2011 06:33:49 PM 631 Views
I only have one thing to ask. callandor1000 - 15/04/2011 02:36:07 PM 487 Views
What about the farm subsidies and the military? Vivien - 15/04/2011 04:54:54 PM 545 Views
Re: What about the farm subsidies and the military? Skeeve the Great - 15/04/2011 08:21:16 PM 509 Views
Cutting the military isn't enough Roland00 - 16/04/2011 04:27:11 AM 484 Views
Defense is 60% of the discretionary budget as well, so it's more like 26% overall. Just sayin'. *NM* Ghavrel - 16/04/2011 04:53:30 AM 243 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes