no it shows that the one statements was not meant to be taken literally
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 17/03/2011 02:47:55 AM
Both statements were given within moments of each other so you can not judge the second statement without keeping in mind what he had said in the first. You don't have to like what he said but the fact remains that the quote posted was misleading and taken out of context. I am not defending Rush and I don't particularly like the man and you will never find me using him as a source. He was making jokes about Chelsy Clinton when she was still a teenager living in the White House and that crosses any reasonable line of decency. It doesn't change the fact that his quote was taken out of context. It was clear to anyone willing to be honest with themselves that it was meant as hyperbole and not as a real claim that they were actaully doing it. He was claiming it was the kind of thing they would do. And lets be honest almost any national disaster from flooding to rain to drought to hurricanes to snow storms to heat waves has been blamed on global warming in the last few years. He was poking fun at that.
By the way I am still not convinced the other guy was not implying that Mother Nature was literally sending us a signal but I do accept that I don't have enough context to make that judgment and I am not going assume that is what he meant simply because it fits my view of reactionary environmentalist.
By the way I am still not convinced the other guy was not implying that Mother Nature was literally sending us a signal but I do accept that I don't have enough context to make that judgment and I am not going assume that is what he meant simply because it fits my view of reactionary environmentalist.
So, how many drugs is Rush Limbaugh actually on?
16/03/2011 08:30:25 AM
- 838 Views
Possibly different ones then the EESC president
16/03/2011 03:58:41 PM
- 731 Views
No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
16/03/2011 04:22:52 PM
- 532 Views
Tsunami and climate change
17/03/2011 11:59:36 PM
- 681 Views
"Speakers were careful to point out that many findings still amounted only to hypotheses"
18/03/2011 01:31:44 PM
- 671 Views
Re: No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
18/03/2011 12:25:01 PM
- 699 Views
Republican spin doctor Frank Luntz popularized "climate change" to make global warming appealing.
18/03/2011 01:56:01 PM
- 581 Views
A slightly misleading post
16/03/2011 07:41:46 PM
- 616 Views
Kind of missed the point there
16/03/2011 09:54:35 PM
- 619 Views
If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
16/03/2011 10:16:21 PM
- 491 Views
Re: If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
16/03/2011 10:44:56 PM
- 631 Views
" I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
16/03/2011 11:10:11 PM
- 652 Views
Re: " I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
16/03/2011 11:42:29 PM
- 481 Views
I've read the transcript
16/03/2011 10:34:41 PM
- 642 Views
Re: I've read the transcript
16/03/2011 10:46:42 PM
- 557 Views
You need to reread what I said
16/03/2011 10:49:45 PM
- 519 Views
No, I think you're still missing my point
16/03/2011 11:09:04 PM
- 597 Views
No. You don't get to say, "what he said doesn't matter because of how we learned of it".
16/03/2011 11:54:46 PM
- 545 Views
I think Republicans should stop using "legitimate". I do not think it means what they think it means
16/03/2011 04:11:14 PM
- 638 Views
there are enough carzies on the left to make things like this easy for Rush
16/03/2011 04:20:47 PM
- 583 Views
So it doesn't matter that no one said it as long as he can plausibly claim they did.
16/03/2011 06:58:17 PM
- 513 Views
well since it is taken out of context it is hard to say where Rush was going with it
16/03/2011 07:19:46 PM
- 618 Views
Um... he stated where he was going with it.
16/03/2011 07:30:02 PM
- 579 Views
At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard
16/03/2011 08:17:39 PM
- 525 Views
It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe.
16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM
- 645 Views
I don't thinkit is as clear as you make it out to be
16/03/2011 09:31:53 PM
- 538 Views
It is not just "possible" he's talking about islands affected by global warming; he says it outright
16/03/2011 10:09:16 PM
- 696 Views
Sorry but I still fail to see how the islands he mention are a sign of what needs to be done
16/03/2011 10:27:20 PM
- 582 Views
Then you don't understand context and this whole discussion is pointless.
16/03/2011 11:28:47 PM
- 661 Views
lets throw a little context at asnd see if it matters
17/03/2011 12:12:03 AM
- 544 Views
Yes: It makes it worse.
17/03/2011 12:45:12 AM
- 552 Views
no it shows that the one statements was not meant to be taken literally
17/03/2011 02:47:55 AM
- 576 Views
At best, it shows he was joking about something he believes to be fact despite lacking evidence.
18/03/2011 02:24:45 PM
- 653 Views
so you finally agre that the context changes the meaning, took you long enough
18/03/2011 02:33:41 PM
- 531 Views