She didn't specify whom she was referring to as "those terrorists" but she did refer to the entire proceeding as "pure unadulterated evil". Rather than making exceptions for those with no involvement in nor interest in terrorism she went out of her way to include them in her calls for violence. And if one of my city councilmen was inciting violence in that way I'd make a point of knowing their name; I realize that you're "not overly impressed" that a majority of that community chose someone who publicly endorses violence to run their government; again, that's the problem. Apparently her problem isn't terrorism itself, but only specific forms of it, which ought to disqualify her from public office--but just as apparently doesn't.