Active Users:379 Time:04/04/2025 11:31:08 PM
What about it? Shannow Send a noteboard - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM
That perfectly encapsulates the difference between striving for purity from within, as opposed to superficial and hypocritical purity only when others can see what you are doing (like the guy that is the subject of this thread).

In other words, you must strive for pure thougths first and foremost, and then pure actions will flow from that.

Of course, none of us can achieve that, because we are imperfect, but we must forever be striving to achieve it nevertheless.

Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1321 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 526 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 493 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 836 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 493 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 767 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 819 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 804 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 1003 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 452 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1117 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 398 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 906 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 767 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 856 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 786 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 1032 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 973 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 846 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 429 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 869 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 1041 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 777 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 746 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1164 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 908 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 451 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 938 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 711 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 451 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 750 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 909 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 789 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 928 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 707 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 901 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 777 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 880 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 424 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 708 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 458 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 740 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 456 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 819 Views

Reply to Message