Active Users:1133 Time:23/11/2024 04:10:56 AM
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? Joel Send a noteboard - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM
Though I suppose from a Universalist perspective it makes sense, but from that perspective I'm not sure why it matters what any of us do since it'll all be made right for everyone in the end. Show me your works and I'll show you your faith, but if your works don't demonstrate a living faith a post mortem course in Remedial Morality will make it alright whether you're Genghis Khan, Gandhi or Mother Theresa. In the mean time, I'm not sure what preching the gospel accomplishes except to make people feel like garbage for past and future instances of betraying God. :confused:
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1259 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 502 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 464 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 778 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 466 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 699 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 763 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 742 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 939 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 428 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1055 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 374 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 844 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 702 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 792 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 729 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 962 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 913 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 783 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 402 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 808 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 981 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 719 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 682 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1107 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 846 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 426 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 864 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 652 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 428 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 694 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 843 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 725 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 868 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 642 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 835 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 717 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 826 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 405 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 640 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 432 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 681 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 442 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 771 Views

Reply to Message