But when you post subjects you know, or at least should know, are going to be controversial don't try and act like you were just making fun of the use of the word hard.
It's funny because someone who was once a very public, outspoken proponent of morality who condemned others for their sins, is now giving an interview nonchalantly talking about doing meth with male prostitutes.
The post itself doesn't insult anyone's religion, which is what you said.
Also, Shannow said she didn't see what the point of the post was, and I responded that I thought it was funny- I simply explained the pun because it seemed like you were a humorless asshole, and I wanted to help you learn.
I amuse myself.
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old
- 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM
1260 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM*
- 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM
464 Views
It was something that made me laugh?
- 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM
778 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM
467 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard"
- 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM
699 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care
- 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM
763 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care
- 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM
743 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM
374 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle...
- 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM
844 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human
- 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM
703 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here...
- 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM
792 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex.
- 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM
729 Views
Err...no.
- 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM
962 Views
Re: Err...no.
- 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM
914 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed...
- 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM
783 Views
Nah, I know better than to argue with you. I just thought your phrasing was rather silly.
- 27/01/2011 10:14:50 PM
664 Views
I completely and utterly disagree
- 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM
720 Views
The carnal nature of the flesh just happens to be the way we're all innately broken.
- 27/01/2011 11:30:09 PM
875 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away.
- 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM
683 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM
426 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But...
- 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM
864 Views
I was thinking along the lines of Christans who are gay or or believe in gay rights.
- 27/01/2011 09:29:50 PM
740 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim.
- 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM
725 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? 
- 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM
868 Views
- 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM
868 Views
Don't even know what that means. 
- 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM
643 Views
- 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM
643 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism
- 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM
836 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know.
- 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM
720 Views
- 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM
720 Views
Point of emphasis.
- 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM
826 Views
- 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM
826 Views
Agreed. *NM*
- 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM
406 Views
*NM*
- 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM
406 Views
Then I'm confused, either about what you believe or how you reconcile it with my second paragraph.
- 28/01/2011 10:54:13 PM
907 Views
At the risk of simplifying: All roads don't lead to Cleveland, nor do they lead to God.
- 01/02/2011 03:47:57 PM
908 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies
- 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM
641 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much"
- 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM
682 Views
This guy needs serious mental help, in my humble laymans opinion.
- 27/01/2011 11:42:00 PM
738 Views