We're not going to get anywhere, better to let it go
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM
- 1990 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"?
16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM
- 852 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable.
16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM
- 1029 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but...
16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM
- 1074 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already
16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM
- 1367 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread.
16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM
- 925 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either
16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM
- 928 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it.
16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM
- 956 Views
Oh please don't you start to
17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM
- 810 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before.
17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM
- 979 Views
it was used here and nobody commented
17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM
- 869 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here
17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM
- 920 Views
It's funny you should say that...
18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM
- 952 Views
Precisely: I noticed, but it hadn't become a rallying cry for "the real victim" (Palin).
19/01/2011 12:14:48 AM
- 1061 Views
I thought you were the real vicitim
19/01/2011 02:49:06 PM
- 1035 Views
When and where did I say that? The ultimate victim is America, but six members of it just died.
19/01/2011 11:24:27 PM
- 756 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that...
19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM
- 938 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry.
20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM
- 961 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright.
18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM
- 794 Views
but is he accussed of being a tasteless moron who doesn't know what it means?
19/01/2011 02:28:03 PM
- 838 Views
I don't know, if I have to judge him based on that one article, then tasteless moron, absolutely.
19/01/2011 06:14:43 PM
- 953 Views
The peole who called her stupid for using the term didn't know it was so wide spread either
17/01/2011 02:33:19 PM
- 812 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM
- 1005 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM
- 1035 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her.
17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM
- 1172 Views
That means precisely nothing
17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM
- 871 Views
It means everything.
18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM
- 1140 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic
19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM
- 745 Views
There are two points:
19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM
- 933 Views
I don't agree, but I understand. *NM*
19/01/2011 10:14:13 PM
- 458 Views
Giffords' statements and Palins are matters of public record; they're indisputable.
19/01/2011 11:34:53 PM
- 909 Views
I must say, if more people on both sides could say that we'd all be better for it.
20/01/2011 04:32:55 AM
- 952 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument
19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM
- 1025 Views
Your inability/unwillingness to follow basic and clearly delineated logic is not my failing.
20/01/2011 01:19:31 AM
- 846 Views
I admit I can't follow gnome logic *NM*
20/01/2011 05:50:22 AM
- 448 Views
I demonstrated the connection, whether or not you choose to look the other way.
20/01/2011 03:16:28 PM
- 923 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic
17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM
- 970 Views
Giffords said Palins crosshairs imagery would have "consequences"; Palin calls the suggestion libel.
18/01/2011 08:54:45 PM
- 864 Views
yes but the only consequences is liberals using them to slander Palin
19/01/2011 02:58:35 PM
- 943 Views
I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so.
20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM
- 1179 Views
It was an example of blaming the victim, a phrase you keep misusing
20/01/2011 06:28:21 PM
- 884 Views
I thought you said only liberals blinded by political bias committed that grave sin.
20/01/2011 07:47:09 PM
- 931 Views
so in other words you again missed the point
20/01/2011 08:26:49 PM
- 881 Views
Well, one of us did.
20/01/2011 09:24:35 PM
- 995 Views
so lets be clear do you or don't you understand what it means to "blame the vicitm"?
20/01/2011 10:03:48 PM
- 637 Views
I understand it well; can we be equally clear you say the victim here is Palin?
20/01/2011 10:44:08 PM
- 1070 Views
So I am a little confused on something...
16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM
- 1028 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this
16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM
- 1163 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly...
17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM
- 900 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM
- 908 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM
- 962 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically.
18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM
- 798 Views
No, they don't
18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM
- 985 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one.
18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM
- 1064 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said
19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM
- 914 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice)
20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM
- 951 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity
20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM
- 999 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice?
20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM
- 1059 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens
20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM
- 857 Views
I thought waterboarding was OK and any suggestion to the contrary was terrorist sympathizing.
20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM
- 809 Views
way to dodge the point again
20/01/2011 08:34:33 PM
- 817 Views
Do you have an example of a credible threat of injury to a Congressman, or calls for one?
20/01/2011 10:02:53 PM
- 899 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again*
20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM
- 884 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it.
20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM
- 882 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book.
16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM
- 1200 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither.
16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM
- 900 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto
17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM
- 878 Views
That first line is says it all.
18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM
- 961 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist
19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM
- 1068 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power".
20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM
- 951 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central...
16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM
- 1155 Views
Again, I don't think Palin intended this, but Giffords feared ten months ago that this could result.
16/01/2011 11:29:19 PM
- 961 Views
And I call bullshit
18/01/2011 03:12:13 PM
- 1102 Views
If Palin wants to accuse Giffords of libel she should have the guts to do it to her face.
18/01/2011 10:39:07 PM
- 1059 Views
So if some jihadist shot Gifford, would you also blame Palin?
19/01/2011 02:52:42 PM
- 943 Views
don't get ti doesn't matter who is to blame it just matters if they can use it *NM*
19/01/2011 04:11:09 PM
- 425 Views
No, I'd blame the shooter first and the mullahs shouting, "JIHAD111" second, as I always do.
20/01/2011 03:11:33 AM
- 1040 Views
Then why are you even here? I pretty much agree with you entirely and I'm fairly liberal. *NM*
18/01/2011 01:16:33 PM
- 534 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed.
16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM
- 878 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM*
17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM
- 448 Views
I didn't realize someone had, but it appears a militia leader was responsible (shocking, I know).
17/01/2011 07:04:08 AM
- 897 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM*
17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM
- 408 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah.
18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM
- 846 Views
Took you this long, huh?
17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM
- 798 Views
I didn't want to look because I was afraid the charges against the far right demagogues might stick.
18/01/2011 11:07:26 PM
- 1124 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy
17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM
- 814 Views
I'm just curious.
17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM
- 790 Views
Had that convo with the cab driver on the way home from a New Years party.
18/01/2011 11:42:07 PM
- 1084 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ).
18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM
- 1007 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity
19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM
- 813 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs?
20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM
- 867 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you
20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM
- 818 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic.
20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM
- 924 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't
20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM
- 728 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that.
20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM
- 821 Views
only in your does the connection exisit
20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM
- 855 Views
No.
20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM
- 934 Views
dude wake up
20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM
- 1075 Views
Fine, I have no problem dropping the "right" label in my condemnations.
20/01/2011 10:39:34 PM
- 1050 Views
Why not just blame Giffords?
17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM
- 1151 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does.
18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM
- 970 Views
The left are the ones storing up hate with their pathetic slaner
18/01/2011 07:53:23 PM
- 925 Views
At least 95% of the blame is Loughners; he's a nut, but that doesn't exonerate the demagogues.
18/01/2011 11:24:11 PM
- 1020 Views
0% belongs to political rhetoric from the right
19/01/2011 02:47:56 PM
- 786 Views
Uh huh; it's absurd to mention right wing rhetoric when left wing rhetoric is the OBVIOUS culprit
19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM
- 830 Views
No leftist rhetoric? You just called a bunch of people 'dangeorus lunatics'
19/01/2011 03:37:54 PM
- 799 Views
Rhetoric is one thing, but I didn't use violent imagery, did I?
20/01/2011 01:40:14 AM
- 1124 Views
no but the democratic party used very similar images in the same state
20/01/2011 06:41:19 PM
- 857 Views
It's news to me, but I condemn all violent inflammatory imagery and rhetoric.
20/01/2011 07:13:18 PM
- 827 Views
it was the national democrats
20/01/2011 08:32:01 PM
- 928 Views
Then that's equally dangerous and reprehensible and more reason to loathe the DLC and DCCC.
20/01/2011 09:49:08 PM
- 1198 Views
The right is not the ones claiming rhetoric is the issue
19/01/2011 03:58:39 PM
- 842 Views
"WE aren't doing it, except for when we are". Admission of guilt is a poor defense.
20/01/2011 03:25:16 AM
- 817 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me.
19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM
- 991 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox
19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM
- 741 Views
You missed the point, obviously.
19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM
- 850 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO
19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM
- 907 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated
19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM
- 767 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long.
19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM
- 997 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM
- 1005 Views
We can debate whether it's coincidental, but the connections are documented fact
22/01/2011 08:17:24 PM
- 973 Views