Active Users:346 Time:05/04/2025 03:53:43 AM
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM
However, what makes it so egregious in this case is that the Loughners principal target had ten months earlier implied Palins crosshair imagery put her life at risk. Consequently, anyone calling that "blood libel" is quite literally blaming the victim, and Palin doing it is literally adding insult to injury.

I honestly think Palin was as shocked and horrified by this as anyone, if perhaps for very different reasons, but that simply means she lacks the judgement to lead. Giffords saw what Palins language might do to her ten months before Loughner tried to kill her, but Sarah Palin STILL can't see a problem.

EDIT: Never mind my redacted paragraph; it's irrelevant to this issue.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 16/01/2011 at 10:28:29 PM
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2071 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 926 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1105 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1151 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1093 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1459 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1003 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1018 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1017 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 932 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 875 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1060 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 941 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 991 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1029 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1010 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1047 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1093 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1190 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 869 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1013 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 993 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1078 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1111 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1256 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 946 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1208 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 818 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1020 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 843 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1228 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1100 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1046 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1095 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1231 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 975 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 984 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1043 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 861 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1055 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1137 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 991 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1025 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1084 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1109 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 956 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 974 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1002 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1251 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1263 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1015 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 936 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 961 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 953 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1033 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1143 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1026 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1031 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 967 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1235 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1078 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 893 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 954 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1038 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 476 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 445 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 924 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 485 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1111 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 870 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 898 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 863 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1009 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 886 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 876 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1026 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 912 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1083 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 896 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 937 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 892 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 997 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 802 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 884 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 928 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1005 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1142 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 878 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 925 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1222 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1053 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1067 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 527 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 810 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 918 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 989 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 842 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 511 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1073 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1096 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1142 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1082 Views

Reply to Message