It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central...
Shannow Send a noteboard - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM
The fact of the matter is, there is absolutely NO connection between Jared Lee Loughner and the Tea Party, the Right in general or Sarah Palin in particular.
The Fort Hood gunman actually shouted Allah Akbar (or whatever they call it) while carrying out his shooting rampage, but for some reason any reaction against Muslims (which would have been well founded in that case) was immediately rejected by the mainstream media. No. The guy was a loner, with no association to Jihadist ideology, despite his obvious actions to the contrary.
And yet, here in the Tuscon shooting, we have a lone gunman lunatic who has NEVER professed to support the Right, and yet even before the facts are out, the mainstream media start blaming it on Palin, the Tea Party and all those "gun toting, Bible clutching" conservatives.
Come on.
The mainstream media is completely biased towards the Left. Sure, Fox is biased towards the Right, but that doesn't even come close to balancing out the overwhelming liberal favoritism of the other news networks.
The Fort Hood gunman actually shouted Allah Akbar (or whatever they call it) while carrying out his shooting rampage, but for some reason any reaction against Muslims (which would have been well founded in that case) was immediately rejected by the mainstream media. No. The guy was a loner, with no association to Jihadist ideology, despite his obvious actions to the contrary.
And yet, here in the Tuscon shooting, we have a lone gunman lunatic who has NEVER professed to support the Right, and yet even before the facts are out, the mainstream media start blaming it on Palin, the Tea Party and all those "gun toting, Bible clutching" conservatives.
Come on.
The mainstream media is completely biased towards the Left. Sure, Fox is biased towards the Right, but that doesn't even come close to balancing out the overwhelming liberal favoritism of the other news networks.
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
- 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM
1989 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"?
- 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM
851 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable.
- 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM
1028 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but...
- 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM
1073 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already
- 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM
1366 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread.
- 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM
925 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either
- 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM
928 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it.
- 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM
956 Views
Oh please don't you start to
- 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM
808 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before.
- 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM
979 Views
it was used here and nobody commented
- 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM
868 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here
- 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM
920 Views
It's funny you should say that...
- 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM
952 Views
Precisely: I noticed, but it hadn't become a rallying cry for "the real victim" (Palin).
- 19/01/2011 12:14:48 AM
1060 Views
I thought you were the real vicitim
- 19/01/2011 02:49:06 PM
1033 Views
When and where did I say that? The ultimate victim is America, but six members of it just died.
- 19/01/2011 11:24:27 PM
754 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that...
- 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM
937 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry.
- 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM
961 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright.
- 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM
792 Views
but is he accussed of being a tasteless moron who doesn't know what it means?
- 19/01/2011 02:28:03 PM
837 Views
I don't know, if I have to judge him based on that one article, then tasteless moron, absolutely.
- 19/01/2011 06:14:43 PM
951 Views
The peole who called her stupid for using the term didn't know it was so wide spread either
- 17/01/2011 02:33:19 PM
811 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
- 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM
1005 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
- 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM
1034 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her.
- 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM
1172 Views
That means precisely nothing
- 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM
870 Views
It means everything.
- 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM
1139 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic
- 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM
744 Views
There are two points:
- 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM
932 Views
I don't agree, but I understand. *NM*
- 19/01/2011 10:14:13 PM
458 Views
Giffords' statements and Palins are matters of public record; they're indisputable.
- 19/01/2011 11:34:53 PM
909 Views
I must say, if more people on both sides could say that we'd all be better for it.
- 20/01/2011 04:32:55 AM
951 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument
- 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM
1025 Views
Your inability/unwillingness to follow basic and clearly delineated logic is not my failing.
- 20/01/2011 01:19:31 AM
845 Views
I admit I can't follow gnome logic *NM*
- 20/01/2011 05:50:22 AM
448 Views
I demonstrated the connection, whether or not you choose to look the other way.
- 20/01/2011 03:16:28 PM
923 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic
- 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM
969 Views
Giffords said Palins crosshairs imagery would have "consequences"; Palin calls the suggestion libel.
- 18/01/2011 08:54:45 PM
862 Views
yes but the only consequences is liberals using them to slander Palin
- 19/01/2011 02:58:35 PM
942 Views
I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so.
- 20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM
1178 Views
It was an example of blaming the victim, a phrase you keep misusing
- 20/01/2011 06:28:21 PM
883 Views
I thought you said only liberals blinded by political bias committed that grave sin.
- 20/01/2011 07:47:09 PM
931 Views
so in other words you again missed the point
- 20/01/2011 08:26:49 PM
880 Views
Well, one of us did.
- 20/01/2011 09:24:35 PM
994 Views
so lets be clear do you or don't you understand what it means to "blame the vicitm"?
- 20/01/2011 10:03:48 PM
636 Views
I understand it well; can we be equally clear you say the victim here is Palin?
- 20/01/2011 10:44:08 PM
1069 Views
So I am a little confused on something...
- 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM
1026 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this
- 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM
1162 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly...
- 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM
898 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
- 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM
908 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
- 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM
961 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically.
- 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM
796 Views
No, they don't
- 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM
983 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one.
- 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM
1064 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said
- 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM
912 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice)
- 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM
949 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity
- 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM
997 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice?
- 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM
1059 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens
- 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM
855 Views
I thought waterboarding was OK and any suggestion to the contrary was terrorist sympathizing. 
- 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM
809 Views
- 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM
809 Views
way to dodge the point again
- 20/01/2011 08:34:33 PM
816 Views
Do you have an example of a credible threat of injury to a Congressman, or calls for one?
- 20/01/2011 10:02:53 PM
899 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again*
- 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM
883 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it.
- 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM
881 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book.
- 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM
1199 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither.
- 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM
899 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto
- 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM
877 Views
That first line is says it all.
- 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM
960 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist
- 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM
1067 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power".
- 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM
950 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central...
- 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM
1155 Views
Again, I don't think Palin intended this, but Giffords feared ten months ago that this could result.
- 16/01/2011 11:29:19 PM
959 Views
And I call bullshit
- 18/01/2011 03:12:13 PM
1100 Views
If Palin wants to accuse Giffords of libel she should have the guts to do it to her face.
- 18/01/2011 10:39:07 PM
1057 Views
So if some jihadist shot Gifford, would you also blame Palin?
- 19/01/2011 02:52:42 PM
943 Views
don't get ti doesn't matter who is to blame it just matters if they can use it *NM*
- 19/01/2011 04:11:09 PM
425 Views
No, I'd blame the shooter first and the mullahs shouting, "JIHAD111" second, as I always do.
- 20/01/2011 03:11:33 AM
1038 Views
Then why are you even here? I pretty much agree with you entirely and I'm fairly liberal. *NM*
- 18/01/2011 01:16:33 PM
534 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed.
- 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM
878 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM*
- 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM
448 Views
I didn't realize someone had, but it appears a militia leader was responsible (shocking, I know).
- 17/01/2011 07:04:08 AM
895 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM*
- 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM
408 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. 
- 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM
845 Views
- 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM
845 Views
Took you this long, huh?
- 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM
798 Views
I didn't want to look because I was afraid the charges against the far right demagogues might stick.
- 18/01/2011 11:07:26 PM
1122 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy
- 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM
813 Views
I'm just curious.
- 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM
789 Views
Had that convo with the cab driver on the way home from a New Years party.
- 18/01/2011 11:42:07 PM
1083 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ).
- 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM
1007 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity
- 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM
813 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs?
- 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM
867 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you
- 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM
817 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic.
- 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM
922 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't
- 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM
726 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that.
- 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM
820 Views
only in your does the connection exisit
- 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM
853 Views
No.
- 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM
932 Views
dude wake up
- 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM
1074 Views
Fine, I have no problem dropping the "right" label in my condemnations.
- 20/01/2011 10:39:34 PM
1049 Views
Why not just blame Giffords?
- 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM
1149 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does.
- 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM
968 Views
The left are the ones storing up hate with their pathetic slaner
- 18/01/2011 07:53:23 PM
924 Views
At least 95% of the blame is Loughners; he's a nut, but that doesn't exonerate the demagogues.
- 18/01/2011 11:24:11 PM
1019 Views
0% belongs to political rhetoric from the right
- 19/01/2011 02:47:56 PM
786 Views
Uh huh; it's absurd to mention right wing rhetoric when left wing rhetoric is the OBVIOUS culprit 
- 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM
829 Views
- 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM
829 Views
No leftist rhetoric? You just called a bunch of people 'dangeorus lunatics'
- 19/01/2011 03:37:54 PM
798 Views
Rhetoric is one thing, but I didn't use violent imagery, did I?
- 20/01/2011 01:40:14 AM
1122 Views
no but the democratic party used very similar images in the same state
- 20/01/2011 06:41:19 PM
856 Views
It's news to me, but I condemn all violent inflammatory imagery and rhetoric.
- 20/01/2011 07:13:18 PM
826 Views
it was the national democrats
- 20/01/2011 08:32:01 PM
928 Views
Then that's equally dangerous and reprehensible and more reason to loathe the DLC and DCCC.
- 20/01/2011 09:49:08 PM
1197 Views
The right is not the ones claiming rhetoric is the issue
- 19/01/2011 03:58:39 PM
841 Views
"WE aren't doing it, except for when we are". Admission of guilt is a poor defense.
- 20/01/2011 03:25:16 AM
815 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me.
- 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM
991 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox
- 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM
739 Views
You missed the point, obviously.
- 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM
848 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM*
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long.
- 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM
996 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
- 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM
1004 Views
We can debate whether it's coincidental, but the connections are documented fact
- 22/01/2011 08:17:24 PM
972 Views