Active Users:1122 Time:23/11/2024 05:03:12 AM
Just to end speculation: It's not about the size of threads ironclad Send a noteboard - 29/12/2010 01:11:08 AM

All things considered size comparisons are unwarranted at this stage, though getting my smaller thread locked gave yours an unfair advantage.


It's about us not being interested in the details you and your gf shared
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
Hey admins... - 27/12/2010 04:03:21 AM 906 Views
That's incredibly funny, and I hope you don't mean me =) *NM* - 27/12/2010 05:17:35 AM 241 Views
HAHA, Joel just got owned! *NM* - 27/12/2010 05:42:46 AM 206 Views
Apparently I also lack your charming sense of decorum. - 27/12/2010 04:23:12 PM 529 Views
I did what I could, but I came too late - 27/12/2010 01:31:01 PM 572 Views
Apparently I suck at drunken spam. - 27/12/2010 03:07:08 PM 508 Views
You did link David Allen Coe and that should be worth some points - 28/12/2010 07:13:30 PM 496 Views
Glad someone appreciated it. - 28/12/2010 10:19:26 PM 496 Views
My hero *NM* - 28/12/2010 05:25:48 PM 201 Views
Good idea. - 27/12/2010 04:17:11 PM 522 Views
Was it realy necessary to make a post out of this, rather than NBing the relevant admins? - 27/12/2010 11:29:04 PM 538 Views
Thinly veiled, at that. *NM* - 28/12/2010 12:13:05 AM 217 Views
It wasn't - 28/12/2010 02:47:27 AM 524 Views
Fair enough. - 28/12/2010 10:21:27 PM 485 Views
Just to end speculation: It's not about the size of threads - 29/12/2010 01:11:08 AM 540 Views
Yeah, sorry 'bout that. - 29/12/2010 03:44:40 AM 481 Views
We do. - 28/12/2010 12:25:44 AM 530 Views
You know that there *is* an ignore function, right? - 28/12/2010 12:43:36 AM 485 Views
I was confused by the request as well. - 28/12/2010 01:01:33 AM 516 Views
Trying to shake me down for cash, I see - 28/12/2010 02:53:41 AM 521 Views

Reply to Message