Active Users:421 Time:20/04/2025 02:43:47 PM
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. ranagrande Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM
Empirical evidence must be augmented by logical analysis to provide a full explanation of reality, of course, but that's not the issue here. Without evidence as an objective standard, there is no way to distinguish the relative accuracies of any worldviews. I could say "evidence of extraterrestrial life shows that the universe is a giant house cat, and it creates life so that it will have mice to chase," and without some standard for comparison, that would be just as legitimate a statement.


Logic, empirical evidence, and the scientific method are undoubtedly useful, and they can explain our immediate surroundings quite well, but they are inadequate when taken to the extremes.

For instance, you can follow a trail of evidence back through time to the Big Bang, and then it breaks down. What caused that explosion? Where did it come from? The cyclical universe theory can push back further, but there must at some point have been a beginning.

If there was a beginning, what caused it? If not, what was there before? There are really only three possibilities. The first is that the universe came into being out of nothing, in violation of the laws of physics. The second is that the universe itself is eternal and has always existed in one form or another. The third is that it was created by a higher power.

There is not, and I suspect that there never can be, any empirical evidence to prove or disprove any of those possibilities. No matter what sort of reality you choose to believe in, you believe in it by faith.

Since you're free to place your faith in anything you wish, you could of course choose to believe in the eternal house cat that is the universe, and that would indeed be just as valid a conception of true reality as any that you can reach through evidence alone.
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1075 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 544 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 690 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 285 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 243 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 600 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 659 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 648 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 639 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 553 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 681 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 289 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 216 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 549 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 591 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 531 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 732 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 644 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 590 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 683 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 261 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 236 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 588 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 659 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 615 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 812 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 595 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 894 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 561 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 803 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 530 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 721 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 598 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 563 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 518 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 529 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 676 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 626 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 238 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 601 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 544 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 244 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 556 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 524 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 563 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 209 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 212 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 207 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 533 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 621 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 224 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 237 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 652 Views

Reply to Message