Active Users:393 Time:20/04/2025 02:30:51 PM
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. Tom Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM
No life other than us makes it easier to say that the emergence of life in the universe was an accident, a one-off sort of thing that happened for no reason despite our best efforts to impute a reason.

Life everywhere makes life seem like a natural progression of the growth of the universe. If sentient life exists elsewhere, then sentience is a natural goal of the universe, which may support the idea that conscious existence is something the universe is striving for.

Combine that with the cyclical reality that is presupposed by the "echoes of pre-Big Bang events" that removes the linear isolation of the universe and you have a much richer reality being hinted at.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1073 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 543 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 690 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 285 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 243 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 599 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 658 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 647 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 637 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 553 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 680 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 289 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 216 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 548 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 590 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 531 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 732 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 643 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 590 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 682 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 261 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 236 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 588 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 658 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 614 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 812 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 594 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 893 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 560 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 802 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 530 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 720 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 598 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 563 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 518 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 529 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 674 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 624 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 238 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 601 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 544 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 244 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 556 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 523 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 562 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 209 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 212 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 207 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 533 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 620 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 224 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 237 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 652 Views

Reply to Message