- Felisa Wolfe-Simon, NASA astrobiology research fellow, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
Standing joke, her website is ironlisa.com, "Fe=Iron" and all, Iron Lisa. Oceanographer IIRC.
Should be interesting but 'interesting' probably in the 'recent models predict abnormal amino acids content of high-water celestial bodies may be detectable in atmospheric traces which may be observable via telescope' sort of way, I'd be disinclined to think any solid evidence of ET, even little bacteria, will actually show up and that it will be very important new info but to the lay public about as important as the wonderful new development on spin ice or such, I'd love to be wrong but I'd advise everyone to keep their hopes (or fears) down.
I amuse myself.
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system?
30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM
- 1074 Views
photsynthesis using arsnic hmm I am going to have to check this out
30/11/2010 05:07:22 AM
- 676 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe.
30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM
- 599 Views
Re: If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe.
30/11/2010 05:18:05 AM
- 746 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there.
30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM
- 659 Views
Bwa?
30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM
- 647 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely.
30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM
- 680 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM*
30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM
- 289 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM*
30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM
- 216 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias.
30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM
- 549 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework.
01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM
- 591 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit?
01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM
- 531 Views
I think he is saying
01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM
- 732 Views
In short, demanding that everyone use your particular worldview is unfair.
01/12/2010 02:21:26 AM
- 626 Views

Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence.
01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM
- 682 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM*
01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM
- 236 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard.
01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM
- 588 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality.
01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM
- 658 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe?
01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM
- 615 Views
Time does not exist separately from space, as Einstein demonstrated almost a century ago.
01/12/2010 03:36:56 AM
- 668 Views
I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet
01/12/2010 03:56:38 AM
- 907 Views
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet
01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM
- 977 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa"
30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM
- 674 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM
- 625 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM*
30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM
- 238 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"!
01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM
- 601 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet!
01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM
- 544 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM*
01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM
- 244 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged?
01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM
- 556 Views
It's this kind of blind adherence to political correctness that is tearing us apart!
01/12/2010 01:28:39 AM
- 540 Views
They had better have a green man *NM*
30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM
- 209 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM*
01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM
- 212 Views
Oh no you didn't
*NM*
01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM
- 207 Views
