Active Users:394 Time:20/04/2025 02:30:57 PM
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? Larry Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM
NASA Sets News Conference on Astrobiology Discovery; Science Journal Has Embargoed Details Until 2 p.m. EST On Dec. 2


WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold a news conference at 2 p.m. EST on Thursday, Dec. 2, to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life. Astrobiology is the study of the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life in the universe.

The news conference will be held at the NASA Headquarters auditorium at 300 E St. SW, in Washington. It will be broadcast live on NASA Television and streamed on the agency's website at http://www.nasa.gov.

Participants are:
- Mary Voytek, director, Astrobiology Program, NASA Headquarters, Washington
- Felisa Wolfe-Simon, NASA astrobiology research fellow, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
- Pamela Conrad, astrobiologist, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
- Steven Benner, distinguished fellow, Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, Gainesville, Fla.
- James Elser, professor, Arizona State University, Tempe

Media representatives may attend the conference or ask questions by phone or from participating NASA locations. To obtain dial-in information, journalists must send their name, affiliation and telephone number to Steve Cole at stephen.e.cole@nasa.gov or call 202-358-0918 by noon Dec. 2.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Further speculation at this link
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1074 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 544 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 690 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 285 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 243 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 599 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 658 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 647 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 637 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 553 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 680 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 289 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 216 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 548 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 591 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 531 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 732 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 644 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 590 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 682 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 261 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 236 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 588 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 658 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 614 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 812 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 594 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 894 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 560 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 802 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 530 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 720 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 598 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 563 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 518 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 529 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 674 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 624 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 238 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 601 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 544 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 244 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 556 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 523 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 562 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 209 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 212 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 207 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 533 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 620 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 224 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 237 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 652 Views

Reply to Message