Surely chandra's original reaction was not so offensive that it didn't even deserve the two minutes of your time it would've taken to properly explain yourself, or to admit that your statement about Asia "tending to" take the homophobic position was not intended to slight or overlook India and the other countries that didn't. Hell, doing that would even have taken less of your time than this silly back-and-forth.
UN votes to allow discrimination against sexual minorities (i.e. homosexuals)
24/11/2010 02:11:44 AM
- 1054 Views
Pretty appalling, but also rather unsurprising on who voted which way. *NM*
24/11/2010 02:32:37 AM
- 323 Views
Some surprises, though.
24/11/2010 02:52:17 AM
- 837 Views
I agree about South Africa - they have legal gay marriage!
24/11/2010 11:04:10 AM
- 717 Views
Yeah, but when they brought that in they didn't have Jacob Zuma for president. *NM*
24/11/2010 02:35:56 PM
- 318 Views
I was surprised to see China there. *NM*
24/11/2010 03:06:12 AM
- 299 Views
Why? Their exemplary record on Civil Rights?
24/11/2010 08:08:57 PM
- 730 Views
When you return from vacationing in the land of False Dichotomy, let me know.
24/11/2010 11:36:08 PM
- 601 Views
Re: Oh yeah.
25/11/2010 12:13:28 AM
- 637 Views
As noted, the difference is we don't execute people for it, nor condone those who do.
25/11/2010 01:01:47 PM
- 859 Views
When I don't have to explain the Fourth Amendment to you, lecture me on your lectures.
25/11/2010 12:56:35 PM
- 835 Views
Very sad if not a shock. Democracy doesn't work people!
24/11/2010 11:23:42 AM
- 740 Views
The Law and Justice isn't in power anymore on any level, remember?
24/11/2010 02:29:41 PM
- 773 Views
Very simplistic generalisation here, perhaps you should correct it *NM*
24/11/2010 07:08:54 PM
- 415 Views
He said "tend to", not "are". *NM*
24/11/2010 07:11:47 PM
- 436 Views
It was the inference at a continent level, that I felt was very simplistic.
24/11/2010 07:17:28 PM
- 667 Views
Generalizations are inherently simplified; that doesn't make them inaccurate.
24/11/2010 09:07:24 PM
- 737 Views
It is correct, thank you for your concern though *NM*
24/11/2010 07:58:46 PM
- 305 Views
I disagree
24/11/2010 08:10:11 PM
- 645 Views
Then you are wrong
24/11/2010 08:19:51 PM
- 638 Views
Am I wrong, or are you?
24/11/2010 08:28:26 PM
- 762 Views
You are
24/11/2010 08:41:35 PM
- 601 Views
You did not read my post completely
24/11/2010 08:47:07 PM
- 727 Views
I did
24/11/2010 08:56:39 PM
- 680 Views
Really now, what kind of exchange is this?
24/11/2010 09:35:55 PM
- 678 Views
Chiming in ONLY because I've gotten so much crap for generalizations over the years.
24/11/2010 09:07:12 PM
- 684 Views
How can such tiny stupid cow states have the same amount of votes we do? Disgusting. *NM*
24/11/2010 02:50:10 PM
- 326 Views
Suddenly "Political Correctness" isn't such a dirty word.
24/11/2010 06:50:06 PM
- 730 Views
I always thought that political correctness was where people used euphemisms
24/11/2010 07:15:16 PM
- 671 Views
In practice it usually means they use non-offensive meaningless euphemisms lest someone object.
24/11/2010 08:25:24 PM
- 761 Views
Implying that people are acceptable the way they seems to be politically correct.
24/11/2010 09:22:58 PM
- 760 Views
definitely. So many people are plain rude and try to justify it with being "more honest"
25/11/2010 03:00:42 AM
- 718 Views
Pretty sad, and surprising that so many nations abstained when they could've swung the vote.
24/11/2010 08:34:58 PM
- 758 Views
Do you ever get tired of your hyperbole?
24/11/2010 09:48:21 PM
- 740 Views
Of course not, it's a legitimate rhetorical device if not used (or taken) literally.
25/11/2010 12:38:55 PM
- 865 Views
Biggest surprise is Chavez. Going against Ahmadinejad, Hu, and Putin? Guess he didn't get the memo. *NM*
25/11/2010 03:36:04 AM
- 405 Views
it is? I didn't see it as a big suprise
25/11/2010 11:03:40 AM
- 825 Views
If you don't stop saying things with which I agree I'm going to think one of us is sick.
25/11/2010 01:10:27 PM
- 1064 Views