I agree about South Africa - they have legal gay marriage!
Legolas Send a noteboard - 24/11/2010 11:04:10 AM
Other than that, I'm pleasantly surprised India voted no, not so much surprised that the Muslim countries voted in favour, abstained or were absent (would've been interesting to see what e.g. Albania would've voted). Not surprised at all about Singapore - it's hardly news that Singapore is rather conservative in some matters.
UN votes to allow discrimination against sexual minorities (i.e. homosexuals)
- 24/11/2010 02:11:44 AM
1055 Views
Pretty appalling, but also rather unsurprising on who voted which way. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 02:32:37 AM
323 Views
Some surprises, though.
- 24/11/2010 02:52:17 AM
839 Views
I agree about South Africa - they have legal gay marriage!
- 24/11/2010 11:04:10 AM
719 Views
Yeah, but when they brought that in they didn't have Jacob Zuma for president. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 02:35:56 PM
318 Views
I was surprised to see China there. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 03:06:12 AM
299 Views
Why? Their exemplary record on Civil Rights?
- 24/11/2010 08:08:57 PM
732 Views
When you return from vacationing in the land of False Dichotomy, let me know.
- 24/11/2010 11:36:08 PM
603 Views
Re: Oh yeah.
- 25/11/2010 12:13:28 AM
639 Views
As noted, the difference is we don't execute people for it, nor condone those who do.
- 25/11/2010 01:01:47 PM
861 Views
When I don't have to explain the Fourth Amendment to you, lecture me on your lectures. 
- 25/11/2010 12:56:35 PM
836 Views
- 25/11/2010 12:56:35 PM
836 Views
Very sad if not a shock. Democracy doesn't work people!
- 24/11/2010 11:23:42 AM
742 Views
The Law and Justice isn't in power anymore on any level, remember?
- 24/11/2010 02:29:41 PM
775 Views
Very simplistic generalisation here, perhaps you should correct it *NM*
- 24/11/2010 07:08:54 PM
415 Views
He said "tend to", not "are". *NM*
- 24/11/2010 07:11:47 PM
436 Views
It was the inference at a continent level, that I felt was very simplistic.
- 24/11/2010 07:17:28 PM
669 Views
Generalizations are inherently simplified; that doesn't make them inaccurate.
- 24/11/2010 09:07:24 PM
739 Views
It is correct, thank you for your concern though
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 07:58:46 PM
305 Views
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 07:58:46 PM
305 Views
I disagree
- 24/11/2010 08:10:11 PM
647 Views
Then you are wrong
- 24/11/2010 08:19:51 PM
640 Views
Am I wrong, or are you?
- 24/11/2010 08:28:26 PM
764 Views
You are
- 24/11/2010 08:41:35 PM
603 Views
You did not read my post completely
- 24/11/2010 08:47:07 PM
727 Views
I did
- 24/11/2010 08:56:39 PM
682 Views
Chiming in ONLY because I've gotten so much crap for generalizations over the years.
- 24/11/2010 09:07:12 PM
685 Views
How can such tiny stupid cow states have the same amount of votes we do? Disgusting. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 02:50:10 PM
326 Views
Suddenly "Political Correctness" isn't such a dirty word.
- 24/11/2010 06:50:06 PM
732 Views
I always thought that political correctness was where people used euphemisms
- 24/11/2010 07:15:16 PM
673 Views
In practice it usually means they use non-offensive meaningless euphemisms lest someone object.
- 24/11/2010 08:25:24 PM
763 Views
Implying that people are acceptable the way they seems to be politically correct.
- 24/11/2010 09:22:58 PM
762 Views
definitely. So many people are plain rude and try to justify it with being "more honest"
- 25/11/2010 03:00:42 AM
720 Views
Pretty sad, and surprising that so many nations abstained when they could've swung the vote.
- 24/11/2010 08:34:58 PM
759 Views
Do you ever get tired of your hyperbole?
- 24/11/2010 09:48:21 PM
742 Views
Of course not, it's a legitimate rhetorical device if not used (or taken) literally.
- 25/11/2010 12:38:55 PM
867 Views
Biggest surprise is Chavez. Going against Ahmadinejad, Hu, and Putin? Guess he didn't get the memo. *NM*
- 25/11/2010 03:36:04 AM
405 Views
it is? I didn't see it as a big suprise
- 25/11/2010 11:03:40 AM
827 Views
If you don't stop saying things with which I agree I'm going to think one of us is sick. 
- 25/11/2010 01:10:27 PM
1066 Views
- 25/11/2010 01:10:27 PM
1066 Views