Active Users:353 Time:21/04/2025 10:10:05 AM
Who said anything about regulation? Joel Send a noteboard - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM
Your obsessive attempts at regulation are beginning to border on the paranoid.

EDIT: By the way, I assume you didn't have to deal with parental controls prior to your HS graduation; otherwise you'd have had trouble even registering a wotmania SN-except wotmania had a language filter, so it wasn't an issue (yet people managed to swear quite fluently). :rolleyes:

My parents are intelligent enough to know that anything they would have tried to install on my computer would have been circumvented within a matter of days.

The "regulation" I'm proposing wouldn't change anything except the accessibility of RAFO, which would be improved. I'm glad your folks had such faith in your judgement (or at least your ability with software) but not everyone is equally blessed.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1026 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 644 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 676 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 367 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 541 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 385 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 344 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 332 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 731 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 729 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 647 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 765 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 594 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 648 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 527 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 654 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 400 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 716 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 566 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 723 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 650 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 759 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 973 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 954 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 629 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 674 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 682 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 659 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 634 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 708 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 330 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 667 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 680 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 555 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 344 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 730 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 654 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 640 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 798 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 683 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 653 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 699 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 708 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 701 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 345 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 831 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 584 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 588 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 219 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 725 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 321 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 615 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 655 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 531 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 638 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 580 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 638 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 624 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 662 Views

Reply to Message