Active Users:693 Time:25/11/2024 09:16:21 AM
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb Floffe Send a noteboard - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM
Believe it or not, most such software doesn't have a manual black- or whitelist (as creating and keeping these up to date would be a huge undertaking), but rely on at least semi-automated means. The upside to this is that new or small sites are also taken care or by such an approach, while manual listings might skip these.
--- signature starts here ---

I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!

e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 957 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 580 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 614 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 340 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 464 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 359 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 319 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 310 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 664 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 674 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 579 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 705 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 523 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 575 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 454 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 596 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 372 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 624 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 504 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 656 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 585 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 694 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 894 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 874 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 569 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 611 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 621 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 588 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 563 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 649 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 306 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 607 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 617 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 476 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 317 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 666 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 590 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 576 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 731 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 615 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 594 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 629 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 636 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 628 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 316 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 757 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 514 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 526 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 196 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 655 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 290 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 553 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 602 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 460 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 571 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 508 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 568 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 585 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 591 Views

Reply to Message