All I said was that spirituality and substance are mutually exclusive in a debate. I was trying to make a funny on all the religious people so they'd get properly offended. Nobody gets my great trolling skills.
Your tough luck that your specious point happens to sound like a perfectly valid point. Kant you be more serious?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe?
14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM
- 823 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness.
14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM
- 558 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons?
14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM
- 520 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything.
14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM
- 494 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul"
14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM
- 553 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul"
14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM
- 555 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things
14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM
- 566 Views
Rum.
14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM
- 558 Views
YES! *NM*
16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM
- 255 Views
How are we not married? *NM*
19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM
- 230 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably.
15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM
- 544 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause.
18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM
- 624 Views
One little correction
20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM
- 630 Views
That makes it more complex, but I agree the same basic problem persists.
07/10/2009 12:11:07 PM
- 660 Views