I frequently refer to any large male or sexually ambiguous organism as "a bull" (for instance, when I catch a large trout I say "it was a big bull", etc.). But apparently my own personal vernacular is, like Jackson Pollock, messy, balding, and misunderstood.
I'd edit, but I hate the edit. So it will remain there, puzzling, incorrect, and a distraction from the overall effort. Thank god that novels don't yet have a link in them that you can point at to see all the errors.
I'd edit, but I hate the edit. So it will remain there, puzzling, incorrect, and a distraction from the overall effort. Thank god that novels don't yet have a link in them that you can point at to see all the errors.
I cannot even copy his manner because the manner of his prose was the manner of his thinking and that was a dazzling succession of gaps; and you cannot ape a gap because you are bound to fill it in somehow or other -- and blot it out in the process. -- Nabokov
I have in my possession, twenty pounds of meat
06/11/2010 08:29:26 PM
- 548 Views
Oh, and this had to be said... Put it in a sack and haunt it. *NM*
06/11/2010 08:34:29 PM
- 174 Views
Re: Cut the ribs into twenty, single pieces.
06/11/2010 09:23:52 PM
- 417 Views
What do you do with the bull, though?
06/11/2010 10:29:00 PM
- 436 Views
Re: Fair point.
06/11/2010 10:40:28 PM
- 472 Views