Active Users:1193 Time:23/11/2024 04:43:58 AM
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons? LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM
There are a lot of aspects of humanity that neither psychology or biology can necessarily explain (at least at the moment). A "soul", so to speak, would explain this. Why can we not percieve our own souls? Maybe we can, but it's entirely unconscious. This would explain gut feelings that. Or maybe we simply cannot perceive it. After all, without the aid of technology, we cannot perceive the action of our cells or their atoms, but it is fact they exist.

I am mostly just stirring up the water here :P I happen to really like musing and guessing and thinking about this subject.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 823 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 247 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 225 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 234 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 617 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM 558 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons? - 14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM 520 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything. - 14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM 494 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM 553 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM 555 Views
Carts and horses. - 18/09/2009 12:10:22 PM 685 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 227 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 552 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 529 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 566 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 575 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 222 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 500 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 558 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 255 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 230 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 212 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 234 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 225 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 241 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 223 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 454 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 214 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 229 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 213 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 518 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 502 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 544 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 573 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 502 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 476 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 532 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 207 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 211 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 753 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 490 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 624 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 630 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 490 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 545 Views

Reply to Message