Active Users:1161 Time:23/11/2024 08:39:49 AM
Yeah, I guess we are. Tim Send a noteboard - 14/10/2010 10:28:40 PM
Cause they can go after as many of their customers as they want.

Or did I wander into a conversation where I misunderstood the context?


I was straying a bit into other areas of law, and rather forgetting the original issue. Also I've just learned about election so it was fresh in my mind :P. It applies when you enter into a contract with someone's agent, but he doesn't tell you he's an agent so you think you're contracting with him instead of with his principal (the person he's an agent for). If things go wrong, you can pick which one to sue, but not both. Now that I think about it, this would never arise if the bank was suing the customer (although it could conceivably arise if the customer was suing the bank). Sorry for the digression.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
Is walking away from a mortgage immoral? - 12/10/2010 04:45:43 PM 1375 Views
Just as a contract is a two way street - - 12/10/2010 05:12:09 PM 875 Views
do we have a moral obligation to society? - 12/10/2010 06:00:17 PM 869 Views
It's a good question - 14/10/2010 02:41:21 AM 784 Views
Sort of have to disagree... - 13/10/2010 02:52:07 AM 820 Views
That's not true actually - 14/10/2010 02:35:43 AM 769 Views
Of course it's immoral. - 12/10/2010 05:13:16 PM 845 Views
But does one sided morality work? - 12/10/2010 05:38:56 PM 965 Views
That's the only kind of morality there is! What the hell is wrong with you? - 12/10/2010 08:15:55 PM 789 Views
nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again - 12/10/2010 09:34:33 PM 785 Views
Re: nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again - 15/10/2010 02:50:49 PM 1283 Views
well I really can't argue with the wrong is wrong end of story belief system - 15/10/2010 05:40:22 PM 986 Views
A contract isn't a promise; it's a legal agreement. *NM* - 12/10/2010 06:25:24 PM 407 Views
Which is why contracts have to be pages and pages long and combed over by bloodsucking lawyers. - 12/10/2010 06:39:18 PM 823 Views
I would agree with you if contracts didn't provide for breaking them. - 12/10/2010 07:33:15 PM 680 Views
Hrm. - 12/10/2010 07:35:38 PM 889 Views
It's not immoral to break the marriage contract. - 12/10/2010 08:19:50 PM 948 Views
I don't see that as the flaw in my logic. - 12/10/2010 08:37:52 PM 845 Views
Re: I don't see that as the flaw in my logic. - 12/10/2010 09:00:00 PM 941 Views
also - 12/10/2010 09:37:38 PM 793 Views
That makes no sense whatsoever. - 13/10/2010 11:38:06 PM 914 Views
That must be why they have you sign something called an agreementory note *NM* - 12/10/2010 07:33:32 PM 407 Views
Exactly *NM* - 12/10/2010 07:58:25 PM 390 Views
So, you think bankruptcy laws are immoral? - 13/10/2010 12:18:43 AM 832 Views
I don't think it's immoral at all. The contract usually specifies penalties for breach. - 12/10/2010 05:28:34 PM 920 Views
I thought the answer might be something like that. *NM* - 12/10/2010 05:35:35 PM 375 Views
that is close to the way I see it - 12/10/2010 05:45:25 PM 776 Views
It's both legal and immoral. - 12/10/2010 06:37:49 PM 859 Views
You didn't mention the third party - 12/10/2010 08:26:56 PM 706 Views
in a way I did since I did mention society - 12/10/2010 08:54:07 PM 851 Views
Thus the edit - 12/10/2010 09:10:53 PM 877 Views
either way I think you made a good point *NM* - 12/10/2010 09:38:58 PM 374 Views
will those neighbors... - 14/10/2010 04:52:26 AM 980 Views
All depends where you get your morals from, really. - 12/10/2010 08:28:41 PM 837 Views
I guess what i was trying to ask, at least in part - 12/10/2010 09:48:24 PM 803 Views
What if you look at it from the other perspective? - 12/10/2010 09:00:20 PM 857 Views
do you think they would if they had a legal way to do it? - 12/10/2010 10:04:57 PM 831 Views
Good point. *NM* - 12/10/2010 11:10:26 PM 391 Views
Sure, you could do that. - 13/10/2010 01:54:55 AM 859 Views
Much like the concept of morality itself. - 12/10/2010 11:47:23 PM 772 Views
I find this line particularly interesting. - 13/10/2010 12:13:18 AM 793 Views
Dunno. - 13/10/2010 12:56:56 AM 900 Views
As a professional in financial services - no, it is not. - 13/10/2010 01:44:18 AM 807 Views
but almost nobody sees it that way - 13/10/2010 12:53:25 PM 808 Views
Is the deal that if you default, the bank gets the house and nothing else, though? - 13/10/2010 02:40:48 PM 802 Views
yes but the bank has a limited ability to collect - 13/10/2010 02:47:34 PM 715 Views
I think it's morally wrong to walk away from credit card debt. *NM* - 13/10/2010 09:43:11 PM 382 Views
I'm curious how you reconcile that - 13/10/2010 09:47:59 PM 831 Views
Collateral - 19/10/2010 07:21:14 PM 1327 Views
I agree, what do you think is different? - 13/10/2010 09:59:36 PM 833 Views
I lost sleep over it, but I did it anyway. - 13/10/2010 05:24:19 AM 893 Views
OK what if you take it a step further - 13/10/2010 03:44:30 PM 846 Views
Good question - 14/10/2010 05:13:41 AM 864 Views
I have some questions about this issue. - 13/10/2010 08:14:37 AM 818 Views
how do those questions affect the morality of the situation? - 13/10/2010 03:20:14 PM 775 Views
Obviously, the essential difference is can't pay versus won't pay. - 13/10/2010 02:16:07 PM 781 Views
are you socializing your debt when it is a private bank? - 13/10/2010 03:14:48 PM 835 Views
You are when said bank requires a bailout. And very many of them do. - 13/10/2010 03:22:59 PM 794 Views
it is the home fault that the banks have to be bailed out - 13/10/2010 03:49:37 PM 855 Views
I believe it immoral to do harm. - 13/10/2010 04:38:28 PM 868 Views
I really don't understand a system where this could be an advantage. - 13/10/2010 11:16:57 PM 812 Views
There's generally something like a 7 or 10 year limit on credit reporting here. - 13/10/2010 11:46:58 PM 828 Views
What's the use of suing someone who has no money? *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:48:47 PM 440 Views
You can garnish their wages. - 13/10/2010 11:49:36 PM 790 Views
With parsley? - 13/10/2010 11:51:37 PM 878 Views
No, "someone" most certainly did not, wicked young Miss! Hmph! *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:52:40 PM 432 Views
If they suddenly come into some, you're entitled to it. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:07:34 AM 507 Views
Bit of a long shot. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:09:12 AM 357 Views
Very. Best to cover your bases though. *NM* - 14/10/2010 10:04:25 PM 378 Views
Not if the doctrine of election applies. - 14/10/2010 10:14:07 PM 776 Views
Are we not talking about credit companies going after people who owe them money? - 14/10/2010 10:18:47 PM 822 Views
Yeah, I guess we are. - 14/10/2010 10:28:40 PM 860 Views
Re: - 14/10/2010 03:09:18 AM 809 Views
I am currently in that situation... - 14/10/2010 05:03:23 AM 908 Views
Re: I am currently in that situation... - 14/10/2010 05:49:24 PM 1147 Views
it is easy for me and others to be glib when it is just a theory *NM* - 14/10/2010 08:19:16 PM 379 Views

Reply to Message