Active Users:260 Time:19/04/2025 05:04:40 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
What effort? Joel Send a noteboard - 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM
I expect you would have a great deal more activity in a proper chat.

It's pathetically easy, so that just sounds like more of the "we want it, but we don't want to have to DO anything. " Except if no one's doing anything, there isn't anything, especially in Chat. So if no one's bothering, that seems pretty indicative of what to expect from a RAFO Chat.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Chat John - 10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM 1058 Views
Yes Camilla - 10/10/2010 11:10:18 AM 588 Views
Hey you Missa Sedai - 10/10/2010 04:14:47 PM 662 Views
Hey Missa John - 13/10/2010 04:35:46 AM 542 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM* Aeryn - 10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM 371 Views
it depends which chat we get. LadyLorraine - 10/10/2010 05:44:58 PM 621 Views
You're in the Skype Chat now, btw. Joel - 10/10/2010 10:59:24 PM 565 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat. TaskmasterJack - 10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM 693 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does. Joel - 10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM 716 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM* Camilla - 11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM 669 Views
So don't do voice; we rarely do. Joel - 11/10/2010 07:35:33 AM 668 Views
Same *NM* ironclad - 11/10/2010 09:40:29 AM 275 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM* TaskmasterJack - 11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM 362 Views
Come and find out *NM* Camilla - 11/10/2010 10:48:56 PM 247 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM 382 Views
This. *NM* Ghavrel - 11/10/2010 04:43:52 AM 238 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve. Joel - 11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM 696 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before. TaskmasterJack - 11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM 723 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem. Joel - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM 718 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype. Ghavrel - 12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM 635 Views
What effort? Joel - 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM 614 Views
The effort beyond clicking two buttons. Ghavrel - 13/10/2010 04:25:57 AM 491 Views
Install, make a SN and search for people you email. Joel - 13/10/2010 04:43:09 AM 670 Views
Re: TaskmasterJack - 12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM 502 Views
Then where are they? Joel - 13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM 577 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. Ghavrel - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM 650 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that. Joel - 13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM 643 Views
Incorrect John - 13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM 657 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot. Joel - 13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM 724 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot. BlackAdder - 13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM 593 Views
And me! Kronin al'Sulc - 13/10/2010 03:27:15 PM 592 Views
oops, sorry about that. *NM* BlackAdder - 13/10/2010 03:42:33 PM 546 Views
Sounds right; don't really know much about The Tavern except that's all in character. Joel - 14/10/2010 04:54:06 AM 653 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site. TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM 692 Views
So? Joel - 14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM 652 Views
Are you deliberately trying to not understand? John - 14/10/2010 05:54:16 AM 780 Views
Not deliberately. Joel - 14/10/2010 06:21:09 AM 669 Views
I have to admit that I highly doubt I would ever participate if a revived chat were installed Larry - 13/10/2010 05:08:38 AM 643 Views
I doubt that as well, frankly. *NM* Legolas - 13/10/2010 03:32:33 PM 287 Views
Things aren't what they used to be... TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 10:46:04 PM 593 Views
No John - 13/10/2010 04:45:29 AM 568 Views
"Unmoderated" would be going too far. Joel - 13/10/2010 04:53:19 AM 715 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM* Dan - 12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM 353 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing. TaskmasterJack - 12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM 676 Views
Plenty of people who've been around as long as you, and plenty in good standing. *NM* Dan - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 330 Views
I see that my comments are being interpeted as a blanket insult to all parties involved... TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 11:09:09 PM 659 Views
Also "as long as me" doesn't really factor, because I wasn't using myself to set the bar. TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 11:26:29 PM 709 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM* Dan - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 396 Views
The one who wants to chat, of course? *NM* jh - 13/10/2010 07:23:15 AM 354 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM 328 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd. LiterateDog - 13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM 700 Views
Colorful. You big, gay elitist. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 14/10/2010 12:06:14 AM 357 Views
See Kit - 14/10/2010 05:42:21 AM 558 Views
we are Rafonauts now. Yunalesca - 13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM 537 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though. TaskmasterJack - 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM 717 Views
I sure hope you're right. Joel - 14/10/2010 05:04:26 AM 716 Views
I am RAFOlk. Joel - 14/10/2010 06:22:25 AM 565 Views
When I got facebook I stopped logging in to aim. Avendesora - 11/10/2010 01:24:26 AM 575 Views
There's a Chat if you want one. Joel - 10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM 697 Views
i wouldn't say mutely Yunalesca - 10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM 657 Views
Ditto. Stephen - 10/10/2010 11:53:32 PM 599 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else. Joel - 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM 606 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports? Yunalesca - 11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM 699 Views
I'll usually shut up if someone carries another topic. Joel - 12/10/2010 04:25:19 AM 642 Views
I'd deign to chat with you, m'friend. *NM* LiterateDog - 13/10/2010 11:43:13 PM 317 Views
John - 14/10/2010 05:45:26 AM 590 Views
Re: Kit - 14/10/2010 05:47:07 AM 643 Views
While I'm passing through, "Hi wooly and Kit. Long time." *NM* TaskmasterJack - 14/10/2010 10:14:49 PM 360 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes