Insularity stifles interaction and creativity. At times, the level of discussion at this site is in variety akin to three generations' worth of incestual unions gathering together for a country dance. If it weren't for say a half-dozen people (I'm maybe being too generous with that number), then how long would it take for the hoi polloi here to become aware of certain emerging trends in fiction? Since I never posted about it here, but I bet no more than 2-3 at this site even know that I'm up for an award that will be awarded at the Capclave Convention in two weeks and that is minor in comparison to knowing which are the "hottest" books of the past couple of years
I'm not sure that's a very fair criticism of the people of this site. I think it's a fair criticism of the activity, but there are a number of people who for whatever reason choose not to partake in the discussions about the emerging trends, etc, even though they are quite well versed in those subjects.
Most of those I've seen who are aware of discussions and "hot topics" elsewhere appear to be those who are only secondarily active at this site compared to others they initiate and/or participate. All I have to do is point to the anemic participation in the recent awards thread at the Books MB and the excuses given.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
>: [ So apparently none of us were good enough for wotmania....
09/10/2010 08:33:46 PM
- 2075 Views
I want to know more about this!
09/10/2010 08:36:02 PM
- 1115 Views
I know! I don't understand why they're using the wotmania domain name for this...
09/10/2010 09:45:26 PM
- 1157 Views
I guess Jason offered a lot of money then? *NM*
09/10/2010 08:41:09 PM
- 609 Views
We were told it was about the "trust" that the wotmania members had put in Mike by signing up. *NM*
09/10/2010 08:46:11 PM
- 453 Views
Indeed. Imagine this has quashed any vestiges of good feeling towards the man. *NM*
09/10/2010 08:47:12 PM
- 641 Views
Yeah, I wasn't overly angry with Mike before, but that's changed *NM*
09/10/2010 08:58:51 PM
- 607 Views
Someone had already pointed this out in the other thread from a while back. It's bullshit.
09/10/2010 08:48:27 PM
- 1043 Views
Huh. I completely missed that.
09/10/2010 08:49:52 PM
- 1224 Views
I bet you say that a lot, Beks. *NM*
09/10/2010 09:01:22 PM
- 653 Views
nonsense. I will indulge in my internet RIGHT to nerdrage!!! *NM*
09/10/2010 08:50:46 PM
- 619 Views
Oh, I'm not saying don't be mad over it and don't talk about it.
09/10/2010 08:58:47 PM
- 1183 Views
I don't know; pretty sure a redirect page isn't terribly rough on the servers. *NM*
09/10/2010 09:13:58 PM
- 535 Views
Of course it isn't, but he didn't have to do it.
09/10/2010 09:21:14 PM
- 1083 Views
The dragonmount wotmania landing page with the redirect is still accesible if you google wotmania *NM*
09/10/2010 09:37:16 PM
- 3521 Views
Truthfully (and I'm sure I've expressed some of this before at one point or another)...
11/10/2010 10:40:44 PM
- 951 Views
That's a little bit bum!
09/10/2010 09:01:21 PM
- 949 Views
For what it's worth, after A Memory of Light comes out Dragonmount will go down like a rock.
09/10/2010 09:44:27 PM
- 1143 Views
good point, but that doesn't make me feel better about Mike being an ass *NM*
09/10/2010 09:46:18 PM
- 521 Views
Oddly it makes me feel better. He has a point. "Read and Find Out" is a timeless name.
10/10/2010 12:14:29 AM
- 970 Views
Right, like Planet Tolkien did after the Silmarillion.
10/10/2010 02:28:01 AM
- 1079 Views
I essentially totally disagree with everything you said and its underlying premises. *NM*
10/10/2010 05:36:01 AM
- 588 Views
I just messaged dragonmount on twitter!
10/10/2010 12:02:56 AM
- 977 Views
Why would he name his movie site wotmania? *NM*
10/10/2010 12:12:09 AM
- 581 Views
He might have picked it as it has some recognition in the area he is making films
10/10/2010 12:25:52 AM
- 978 Views
He didn't, it just redirects there. And judging by the Twitter comment that wasn't on purpose. *NM*
10/10/2010 12:57:04 AM
- 623 Views
I'm not angry at anyone. Wotmania died aug 2009.
10/10/2010 02:04:57 AM
- 929 Views
It doesn't matter *why* it was wrong, it just was
10/10/2010 02:54:07 AM
- 990 Views
Point taken. And I am sorry for the loss of Wotmania, the way it used to be.
10/10/2010 08:15:59 AM
- 991 Views
*throws chocolate fudge at you*
10/10/2010 11:34:42 AM
- 960 Views
*returns fire w/ Marshmallow shooter!!*
10/10/2010 01:32:10 PM
- 1065 Views
Re: >: [ So apparently none of us were good enough for wotmania....
10/10/2010 05:33:00 AM
- 1158 Views
Too much bitterness yet.
10/10/2010 06:11:42 AM
- 1032 Views
Well...
10/10/2010 06:47:49 AM
- 1142 Views
I guess maybe that's fair.
10/10/2010 06:55:07 AM
- 1047 Views
Insularity has been a problem for years now
10/10/2010 07:23:10 AM
- 1030 Views
Re: Insularity has been a problem for years now
10/10/2010 05:44:27 PM
- 1054 Views
I don't think most are well-versed, unfortunately
10/10/2010 06:52:49 PM
- 842 Views
Dear Jason:
10/10/2010 08:44:47 AM
- 999 Views
This.
10/10/2010 11:27:36 AM
- 1407 Views
I don't agree.
10/10/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 1102 Views
Re: I don't agree.
10/10/2010 11:44:05 AM
- 1108 Views
There is email... Or the Dragonmount forums...
10/10/2010 11:53:42 AM
- 922 Views
Agreed.
16/10/2010 01:21:50 PM
- 1064 Views
I agree.
10/10/2010 01:52:27 PM
- 875 Views
And now Jason is free to make his own choices with the domain... *NM*
12/10/2010 11:30:54 AM
- 573 Views
Yes.
13/10/2010 12:14:07 AM
- 1070 Views
Hi
10/10/2010 11:38:13 AM
- 1172 Views
Re: Hi
10/10/2010 01:29:48 PM
- 1225 Views
Unless someone is willing to buy the domain or he's willing to sell it, it's his.
10/10/2010 03:35:23 PM
- 916 Views
Stupid browser cache!
11/10/2010 03:01:09 PM
- 1147 Views
Frankly, I agree, but having heard the arguments the other way, I can see that side.
16/10/2010 02:08:08 PM
- 1284 Views
Classy response, Jason. Thank you for taking the time to let us know what was happening.
10/10/2010 06:46:32 PM
- 953 Views