know I just noticed point in your article you over looked
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/10/2010 04:27:47 AM
1st: No parents brought their kids there. That is exactly the lie our state gouvernment tries to tell us. The children and youths were there on their own, on an official event the police either knew about or should have known about.
2nd: about the tarps: it was a rainy day and dozens of people were staying in the park for quite a long time. Not bringing anything against the rain would have been much more remarkable.
BTW even our two rather conservative local newspaers are beginnign to put a blame on the police.
2nd: about the tarps: it was a rainy day and dozens of people were staying in the park for quite a long time. Not bringing anything against the rain would have been much more remarkable.
BTW even our two rather conservative local newspaers are beginnign to put a blame on the police.
The article you sited stated that the parents put them in the front row. Where parents and children are concerned there is very little difference between put and allowed. It is possible that you and the article are using the term children to mean older teenagers but that what I think of when I hear the term child.
The caption on your article states that the protesters came prepared for the water cannon with tarps, I didn't just make it up.
Like I said I really have no idea if the police behaved properly or not. I have only read the article you posted and brief AP report, which by the way had officials saying that more than chestnuts were being thrown.
My comments were about the parents who either brought their children or allowed them to go. If we buy the silly argument that the tarps were for rain (I guess they don't have umbrellas or raincoats in Germany) people were there intending to chain themselves to trees so they could better resit the police. No responsible parent would allow the children to attend a protest where people were planning to physically resist the police.
Stuttgart, Germany, September 30th 2010
01/10/2010 03:32:58 PM
- 1132 Views
the parents should be ashamed for bringing their kids there
01/10/2010 06:11:04 PM
- 897 Views
er... I thought you missed some vital points (or I forgot to mention them)
02/10/2010 12:53:20 AM
- 969 Views
know I just noticed point in your article you over looked
02/10/2010 04:27:47 AM
- 903 Views
Yeah, I'm gonna have to kind of agree with you.
02/10/2010 07:34:12 AM
- 750 Views
the article was wrong on both points
02/10/2010 10:16:46 AM
- 785 Views
That's irrelevant.
02/10/2010 10:59:35 AM
- 737 Views
Re: That's irrelevant.
02/10/2010 11:43:43 AM
- 1365 Views
Youths can organise themselves; we're talking about children.
02/10/2010 01:11:01 PM
- 810 Views
Re: Youths can organise themselves; we're talking about children.
02/10/2010 02:40:46 PM
- 1453 Views
I went to lots of demonstrations when I was a kid
02/10/2010 10:23:04 AM
- 788 Views
. . . as a child? *NM*
02/10/2010 10:46:52 AM
- 366 Views
I think I was 12 on my first one.
02/10/2010 10:49:33 AM
- 859 Views
You're gonna have to share this story.
02/10/2010 11:00:58 AM
- 758 Views
I was a political kid!
02/10/2010 11:03:36 AM
- 756 Views
Well, your freaky childhood behaviour aside. . .
02/10/2010 11:08:36 AM
- 759 Views
Re: Well, your freaky childhood behaviour aside. . .
02/10/2010 11:10:21 AM
- 816 Views
Yeah, I guess it really depends on how they ended up there. . . *NM*
02/10/2010 11:14:10 AM
- 353 Views
Or they didn't have good reason to expect voilence. Which would seem more likely here. *NM*
02/10/2010 01:14:41 AM
- 372 Views
It would not take a genius to know there would probably be violence.
02/10/2010 04:38:52 AM
- 819 Views
Re: It would not take a genius to know there would probably be violence.
02/10/2010 10:26:40 AM
- 1424 Views
I read this about it
02/10/2010 01:18:16 AM
- 775 Views
"Some reports indicate that stones were thrown at police from the crowd of protesters. "
03/10/2010 03:38:19 PM
- 813 Views