Active Users:892 Time:22/11/2024 12:17:12 PM
Because the law in question only eliminated it for women. Phelix Send a noteboard - 30/09/2010 05:27:12 AM
They need to do away with it all together except in extreme cases. It is 2010, women can support themselves even it may not be in the style they had grown accustomed to. In most the case I have seen the guy sure isn't living the same life style he was before the divorce. Family courts should not be used for extortion.


If the law was even handed and eliminated alimony all together, or in all cases of infidelity, sure that would be fine, but it didn't do that. It specifically called out women.

That said, if you're divorcing and suing for half of your joint possessions, you could make a strong argument that the years of support you gave your spouse entitles you to a portion of their income until you marry again because without you and your support they would not have been able to achieve as much, especially if you became a stay-at-home spouse or parent to allow them to work.
I was Phelix on wotmania, I will always be Phelix in the "real" world, and now I am Phelix on RAFO.

You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Scuzziest politcal ad of the season... so far - 29/09/2010 08:06:19 PM 1045 Views
You think that's worse than Renee Elmer's one in North Carolina? - 29/09/2010 08:38:30 PM 1038 Views
you may not like her position but it isn't a blatant lie - 29/09/2010 08:47:44 PM 697 Views
Yes, much - 29/09/2010 08:55:38 PM 700 Views
The ad didn't make me cringe, but the interview afterward certainly did - 29/09/2010 09:07:06 PM 673 Views
Yeah... oh dear, this is painful. - 29/09/2010 09:37:26 PM 660 Views
I'm with the other people responding. - 29/09/2010 09:18:50 PM 712 Views
The bad news he will lose in November - 29/09/2010 08:42:22 PM 647 Views
His name is Daniel Webster. That is awesome *NM* - 29/09/2010 09:02:15 PM 328 Views
To be fair... - 29/09/2010 11:59:33 PM 757 Views
What little I found in the time I had... - 30/09/2010 04:02:51 AM 777 Views
Why should a woman get alimony for cheating on her husband? - 30/09/2010 05:23:03 AM 671 Views
Because the law in question only eliminated it for women. - 30/09/2010 05:27:12 AM 928 Views
What law? - 30/09/2010 07:49:59 PM 759 Views
Shedding a little light on the "Law" in question. - 01/10/2010 12:40:00 AM 793 Views
You can argue almost any position but that doesn’t make it right - 30/09/2010 08:17:03 PM 776 Views
Poor life choices? - 30/09/2010 09:46:14 PM 746 Views
I did say in rare case they deserve limited alimony - 30/09/2010 10:47:39 PM 762 Views
I'm not saying that alimony should be very high, of course. - 30/09/2010 11:27:08 PM 678 Views
This is why I hate politics. *NM* - 30/09/2010 12:11:08 AM 319 Views
Pathetic. *NM* - 30/09/2010 12:25:52 AM 328 Views
I like how he disabled comments for the video. Pussy. *NM* - 30/09/2010 06:40:57 AM 327 Views

Reply to Message