By definition, that's the information you want to make public to the world, and is every bit the same as posting pictures of your vacation on your office door. I think employers have every right to content you make publicly available, and have no problem at all with the idea. Of course, I've heard of employers who require that employees friend them or whatever, and I vehemently disagree with that.
HR looks at facebook.
13/09/2010 07:07:35 PM
- 964 Views
Your public profile is exactly that.
13/09/2010 07:34:17 PM
- 623 Views
my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 07:53:03 PM
- 702 Views
Re: my brother's girlfriend got fired because of a facebook picture
13/09/2010 10:17:41 PM
- 614 Views
Was it supposed to be a HIPAA violation or something?
14/09/2010 10:41:44 PM
- 601 Views
I would say it was because she was letting unauthorized people handle babies under intensive care.
14/09/2010 10:55:45 PM
- 550 Views
I wish they would've fired my coworker.
14/09/2010 10:54:48 PM
- 534 Views
Public is public is public.
13/09/2010 08:28:19 PM
- 558 Views
no one should have to be accountable for their stupidity!!!
13/09/2010 09:07:01 PM
- 606 Views
You typically are held accountable for your stupidity at a job.
13/09/2010 09:13:39 PM
- 527 Views
Who? *NM*
13/09/2010 08:53:00 PM
- 289 Views
Human resources. *NM*
13/09/2010 09:04:14 PM
- 259 Views
Thanks. Why not write that, April? *NM*
13/09/2010 10:34:02 PM
- 302 Views
Because HR is a very widely used abbreviation in the English-speaking world. *NM*
13/09/2010 11:11:56 PM
- 299 Views
It's really a word in itself by now. *NM*
13/09/2010 11:29:04 PM
- 254 Views
Hmpf *NM*
14/09/2010 08:15:33 AM
- 306 Views
What does that stand for? Something with ridiculously too many letters and in German, no doubt. *NM*
15/09/2010 12:43:40 AM
- 267 Views
Hot Redheads. *NM*
13/09/2010 10:23:12 PM
- 270 Views
Eh, no biggie.
14/09/2010 02:16:37 AM
- 507 Views
Where it might be justified would be if the employee had just called into work
14/09/2010 02:55:00 AM
- 533 Views
That's the stupidity clause.
14/09/2010 03:00:30 AM
- 504 Views
maybe it should or it shouldn't...but it does
14/09/2010 04:26:50 AM
- 543 Views
lol, I guess we have different ideas of "simply living."
14/09/2010 05:00:47 AM
- 464 Views
I'd say in that specific case...
14/09/2010 06:11:48 AM
- 525 Views
Huh, it's all the rage here
14/09/2010 02:01:11 PM
- 595 Views
I don't think HR should be looking at what people do outside of work, it seems unethical
14/09/2010 10:42:37 AM
- 484 Views
They shouldn't, but I would expect them to.
14/09/2010 02:08:07 PM
- 543 Views
I agree.
14/09/2010 10:46:12 PM
- 504 Views