Active Users:1129 Time:14/11/2024 06:08:08 AM
I'm inclined to agree. Joel Send a noteboard - 07/09/2010 11:31:59 AM
they give the rest of us Catholics a bad name ;)

Though it would be more accurate, I think, to say that when an adulterers peer group chooses to ignore or condone their adultery the peer group makes itself look bad (which covers a lot more ground than just churches. ) And since the Vatican position on divorce is that of Christ, that it's only permissible in cases of adultery (though I have a good Catholic friend who insists that even then only separation, not actual divorce, is permissible) well, much the same logic applies.

But, yes, when members of any group are engaged in the ongoing practice of something explicitly forbidden by said groups beliefs, that looks bad, and when the group decides to simply ignore the particular belief in question because it's inconvenient, that looks worse. Maybe they should try the Rumsfeld approach: Define same sex marriage as something other than homosexual and then approve whatever new thing they classify it as while maintaining the prohibition on "gay marriage. " :P

As to your main point, two hypocrisies don't make integrity. ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Gay Marriage and Religious Institutions - 04/09/2010 11:36:14 PM 1370 Views
Religion 100% aside, it's"okay" because she breached her contract - 05/09/2010 12:18:36 AM 958 Views
Well, my tripes with it are a little in line with that - 05/09/2010 01:26:56 AM 971 Views
Re: Well, my tripes with it are a little in line with that - 05/09/2010 01:41:34 AM 915 Views
goodness knows that the military sign their rights away ALL THE TIME - 05/09/2010 02:44:58 AM 774 Views
While I understand that view - 05/09/2010 04:05:29 AM 924 Views
There is a difference in the degree of the transgressions and the public nature of them as well. - 05/09/2010 02:30:06 AM 876 Views
agreed. There may be some hypocrisy in the church employment practices... - 05/09/2010 02:49:44 AM 834 Views
That's the crux of it. - 07/09/2010 11:24:44 AM 972 Views
Re: There is a difference in the degree of the transgressions and the public nature of them as well. - 09/09/2010 06:43:23 AM 1152 Views
I could not believe this post was serious. - 10/09/2010 02:04:10 AM 962 Views
Good god... - 10/09/2010 10:52:03 AM 933 Views
To recieve federal funds you can't discriminate - 05/09/2010 04:02:13 AM 974 Views
She chose to work for a Catholic institution. - 05/09/2010 05:54:23 PM 778 Views
what a stupid thing to say - 05/09/2010 07:38:16 PM 919 Views
Um... no? One can be excommunicated for any number of things. *NM* - 05/09/2010 08:22:29 PM 314 Views
yeah back in the time when there was no electricity *NM* - 05/09/2010 08:25:17 PM 356 Views
...um, no. I'm not sure where you're getting that from, but it's completely wrong. - 06/09/2010 01:06:49 AM 823 Views
You can't be excommunicated for being gay - 06/09/2010 02:51:21 AM 904 Views
No one here said you could. - 06/09/2010 03:00:07 AM 836 Views
I am not disagreeing with that, excommunications do happen - 06/09/2010 03:07:57 AM 918 Views
Wow! What an underwhelming argument. - 06/09/2010 04:24:32 AM 882 Views
Actually, the Pope has the right to say "sorry, you're not a Catholic anymore". - 05/09/2010 08:43:34 PM 1026 Views
See above post - 06/09/2010 02:52:25 AM 762 Views
What? - 06/09/2010 02:56:59 AM 774 Views
Nope - 06/09/2010 03:03:48 AM 802 Views
Inaction, like, for example, not saving lives where you could have is also grounds for expulsion. - 06/09/2010 06:35:31 PM 684 Views
Hmm, but I think that's a different type of inaction than the kind he's discussing - 06/09/2010 08:02:50 PM 999 Views
I never infered that that was the case. - 06/09/2010 08:24:30 PM 699 Views
mmm, but your example isn't inaction ALONE - 06/09/2010 08:46:56 PM 803 Views
Hmm interesting question. - 06/09/2010 10:35:19 PM 886 Views
is excommunication about "use" though? - 06/09/2010 10:36:55 PM 919 Views
I don't know. - 07/09/2010 05:47:42 AM 762 Views
yah, I'd agree with that - 07/09/2010 11:59:01 AM 921 Views
Well thank god you aren't the pope - 07/09/2010 03:29:00 AM 884 Views
I would say the same for you. - 07/09/2010 05:50:55 AM 828 Views
Dismas is a Saint? - 07/09/2010 12:08:45 PM 903 Views
It's pretty hard to argue with that one. *NM* - 08/09/2010 04:18:41 AM 293 Views
Yeah, was just surprised they'd made it official is all. - 08/09/2010 04:36:28 AM 869 Views
You are purposefully trying to split hairs - 07/09/2010 03:15:08 AM 806 Views
Calling me an idiot... - 07/09/2010 05:52:39 AM 820 Views
My turn to split hairs: - 07/09/2010 12:10:33 PM 812 Views
does excommunication mean you are no longer Catholic? - 06/09/2010 08:52:58 PM 699 Views
i'm pretty sure we have this conversation on a weekly basis. *NM* - 06/09/2010 09:05:33 PM 333 Views
Yeah. - 06/09/2010 10:34:10 PM 678 Views
is being Catholic a belief system or a club? - 06/09/2010 11:03:00 PM 789 Views
Depends on who you ask - 07/09/2010 03:12:23 AM 938 Views
It's both. - 07/09/2010 05:54:13 AM 884 Views
I'm unsure about that. It doesn't invalidate baptism. - 07/09/2010 08:23:33 AM 762 Views
I thought conformation is what made you a member of the church *NM* - 07/09/2010 06:42:36 PM 303 Views
You're correct. - 08/09/2010 02:33:45 AM 798 Views
Hey I haven't brought up the last two times - 07/09/2010 03:30:18 AM 782 Views
My god people that cheat or divorce shouldn't be Catholic - 06/09/2010 02:26:23 AM 699 Views
I'm inclined to agree. - 07/09/2010 11:31:59 AM 761 Views
Re: I'm inclined to agree. - 10/09/2010 02:36:05 AM 884 Views

Reply to Message