Active Users:1209 Time:23/11/2024 07:13:11 AM
You an deveryone else seriously misunderstands the Volt. everynametaken Send a noteboard - 01/09/2010 12:52:23 AM
The short-term boost that may have been generated by pumping money into GM, combined with the "cash-for-clunkers" stimulus of last year, may be translating into a short-term profit (and a very thin one at that). However, once the Volt comes out, you will see losses. It is too expensive for what it does, and reducing the cost is not an option because it has a high production cost. If the government were to support GM in a long-term fashion, the Volt MIGHT be able to come down in price due to streamlining the process, but not fast enough to compete with Japanese hybrids and electrics.



The Volt is technology that was and still is meant to be futuristic and it was NEVER going to be the backbone of GM and still isn't. And, it was always going to be released to a limited amount of markets and it was always going to be around 40,000. As I point out below, your perception that GM is throwing all its chips in the pot with the Volt is not correct. The entire project of the Volt and its battery technology was driven by competition with Toyota and Honda hybrids not by the government. The government may portray the battery tech of the Volt as the future (and Volt-like vehicles may indeed play a part in the future) but it has never been anything more than another project at GM. GM is developing multiple other projects that are not battery based that should be very competitive.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
A quote regarding the Soviet economy that can be applied to the Obama Administration. - 29/08/2010 08:07:11 PM 1195 Views
the Copernecian model bit was a tad exaggerated - 29/08/2010 08:28:41 PM 709 Views
I wish I could believe the Democrats were only behaving "as" poorly. - 29/08/2010 09:50:23 PM 732 Views
the sad thing is, I really don't think it has to be that way - 29/08/2010 10:31:16 PM 781 Views
This is a classic mistake of the independent voter. - 30/08/2010 12:35:33 AM 718 Views
mmm fair enough - 30/08/2010 01:02:31 AM 749 Views
You cannot seriously agree with the Republicans about extending the Bush tax cuts. - 30/08/2010 09:07:59 AM 610 Views
I would target lowering the corporate rate and helping pass-through entities with cuts. - 30/08/2010 02:52:55 PM 670 Views
How many companies actually pay that corporate tax rate, though? - 30/08/2010 03:37:47 PM 794 Views
In reality, virtually no company in the US pays anywhere near the actual corporate tax rate. - 31/08/2010 11:12:05 AM 735 Views
Where are you getting your "information"? *NM* - 31/08/2010 04:24:47 PM 275 Views
Are you saying companies are actually paying 35% in corporate taxes? - 31/08/2010 10:11:28 PM 654 Views
God help us if we ever end up at the OECD average! - 31/08/2010 10:30:34 PM 577 Views
Which have corporate tax rates equal to or lower than that 35%. - 01/09/2010 01:04:34 AM 948 Views
Absolutely not. - 01/09/2010 04:13:24 AM 626 Views
The pot shouldn't call the kettle black - 01/09/2010 10:10:42 AM 798 Views
So you admit... - 01/09/2010 10:22:24 AM 759 Views
Tax cuts should relate to domestic hiring. - 31/08/2010 11:42:11 AM 752 Views
So what you are saying is that for someone like you, it is all about how dishonest you think they ar - 30/08/2010 03:17:27 PM 885 Views
Oh, I concede we're screwed over. - 31/08/2010 06:22:44 PM 614 Views
Soviet economy is an oxymoron - 29/08/2010 10:13:38 PM 798 Views
The only nation "without" an economy is likely North Korea. - 30/08/2010 12:41:19 AM 666 Views
It is true, I know no republicans personally who espouse a Copernican Model of the Universe - 29/08/2010 10:16:38 PM 716 Views
The sun is the center of our solar system. - 30/08/2010 12:42:34 AM 707 Views
More or less - 30/08/2010 01:55:00 AM 723 Views
I loved a quote I saw recently from a retired Navy veteran... - 29/08/2010 10:21:27 PM 797 Views
Excellent quote. *NM* - 30/08/2010 12:36:20 AM 248 Views
For all of the talk about republican social issues even with a majority they didn't do much about it - 29/08/2010 10:25:22 PM 838 Views
that's one reason why I'm O.K. voting republican - 29/08/2010 10:37:02 PM 762 Views
But it often costs them the center in elections, too. - 30/08/2010 12:28:43 AM 624 Views
ignoring the social conseratives would not work either - 30/08/2010 03:09:21 PM 715 Views
I have a strong dislike for Hilary Clinton. - 29/08/2010 11:38:10 PM 668 Views
I find myself regretting that she didn't beat Obama in the primaries. - 30/08/2010 12:30:28 AM 609 Views
I would have voted for her in the general. *NM* - 30/08/2010 03:29:01 AM 269 Views
Interesting comparison - 30/08/2010 04:19:40 AM 667 Views
possibly because.... - 30/08/2010 04:24:23 AM 702 Views
I'm curious... - 31/08/2010 12:08:44 PM 822 Views
Lower taxes and cut costs, and cutting regulation. - 30/08/2010 02:55:19 PM 775 Views
That's why I'm a Libertarian - 30/08/2010 09:22:18 AM 675 Views
Strict libertarians are disliked for some of their own insane ideas. - 31/08/2010 06:21:12 PM 540 Views
Oh, but that just sounds like insanity - 01/09/2010 07:54:09 AM 876 Views
I don't know MUCH about politics - however.. - 30/08/2010 01:49:03 PM 737 Views
If Republicans focus more on the economy, we have our best chances. - 31/08/2010 06:18:49 PM 516 Views
ME TOO - 02/09/2010 06:53:43 PM 596 Views
Actually, General Motors has made quite a turnaround, the company is actually making profit now. - 31/08/2010 10:44:15 AM 748 Views
The Economist is being uncharacteristically optimistic on this point. - 31/08/2010 06:17:51 PM 545 Views
You an deveryone else seriously misunderstands the Volt. - 01/09/2010 12:52:23 AM 773 Views
They have reasons in being uncharacteristically optimistic. - 01/09/2010 09:57:10 AM 856 Views
why do you think Ford is doing so well? - 01/09/2010 01:54:11 PM 706 Views
Your undersanding of electric cars at GM is incorrect. - 01/09/2010 12:44:36 AM 747 Views

Reply to Message