if you just tell a student "to create a possessive, add 's" it's much more simple.
In which case you add just a "'"
I'm just guessing on why it changed but the usual reason for thigns like this from what I've seen are that teachers try to keep rules simple.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Grammar Nazis should really enjoy this!
- 25/08/2010 06:55:22 PM
866 Views
Re: Grammar Nazis should really enjoy this!
- 25/08/2010 07:44:41 PM
716 Views
I'd like it more if it wasn't archaic. 
- 25/08/2010 07:57:28 PM
565 Views
- 25/08/2010 07:57:28 PM
565 Views
Isn't that covered with the "then do this" suggestion?
- 25/08/2010 08:17:38 PM
539 Views
The 90's one?
- 25/08/2010 09:00:48 PM
483 Views
I just didn't know if you meant the one in 90's (see commentary) or the one in '90s.
- 25/08/2010 09:08:27 PM
556 Views
You're right. Reading that again, I did find it confusing.
- 25/08/2010 09:14:36 PM
552 Views
Wait a minute, "s's" is acceptable? Charles's really?
- 25/08/2010 08:24:20 PM
538 Views
... of course? *NM*
- 25/08/2010 08:55:00 PM
226 Views
Yes.
- 25/08/2010 09:03:09 PM
570 Views
It seems...wrong to me. Tacky. I will slap anyone that uses it 
*NM*
- 25/08/2010 09:05:31 PM
241 Views
*NM*
- 25/08/2010 09:05:31 PM
241 Views
it's acceptable
- 25/08/2010 09:09:02 PM
553 Views
Re: it's acceptable
- 25/08/2010 09:18:50 PM
543 Views
? but teaching NO s's is an extra detail
- 25/08/2010 09:23:12 PM
525 Views
Except when it is a plural
- 25/08/2010 09:35:46 PM
509 Views