Active Users:587 Time:25/11/2024 10:43:56 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM
I'm sure it depends on the laws in the state, but I'd guess that anyone coming on the driveway without permission is technically trespassing.


I don't think it's automatically technically trespassing unless there's a sign posted. Might be that different states have the default set differently though.





If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1393 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 805 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 960 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 817 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 781 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 832 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 800 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 878 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 758 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 899 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 388 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 832 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 975 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 838 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 757 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 843 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 867 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 384 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 373 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 815 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 853 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 728 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 861 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 722 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 851 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 855 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 768 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 995 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 362 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 402 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 863 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 749 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 703 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 689 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 771 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 902 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 373 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 926 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 847 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 774 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 853 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 871 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 926 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 960 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 817 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 710 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 752 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 369 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 805 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 316 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 744 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1027 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 368 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 839 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 804 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes