Active Users:223 Time:06/04/2025 11:52:32 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM
For parking their car in the driveway? What about parking lots for apartment complexes? You should be able to park your vehicle without it being tampered with.

Where is the line?
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Reply to message
1984 at last...Very Disturbing Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:08:04 PM 1477 Views
what a stupid decision... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:16:49 PM 874 Views
Re: what a stupid decision... Ryan - 25/08/2010 04:23:26 PM 1031 Views
You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:32:08 PM 905 Views
the police aren't snapping pictures. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:36:32 PM 860 Views
oddly enough you can dance naked in front of the window random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:01:33 PM 898 Views
yah, i know there are instances like that LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:15:59 PM 876 Views
How is it really that much different then following in car or helicopter? random thoughts - 25/08/2010 04:27:28 PM 959 Views
it's less that people shouldn't expect privacy behind a fence... LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 04:35:28 PM 838 Views
it's about 4th and 5th amendment, imho moondog - 26/08/2010 03:00:01 AM 976 Views
and how is it different from police hiding a GPS tracker in my coat? Or is that OK too? *NM* Aeryn - 26/08/2010 05:12:30 AM 422 Views
It does seem wrong snoopcester - 25/08/2010 05:04:39 PM 904 Views
^ that's what i was trying to say LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:16:35 PM 1046 Views
When it comes to stuff like this I always same the same thing Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:09:01 PM 933 Views
true. but what if they only think you're breaking the law? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:19:52 PM 835 Views
Well they would easily find out you weren't a drug dealer Dark Knight - 25/08/2010 05:25:40 PM 934 Views
wait, now i'm guilty until proven innocent? LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:32:42 PM 946 Views
most of those people deserved to be tasered *NM* random thoughts - 25/08/2010 05:45:29 PM 416 Views
most of the old women and non-resisting people deserve to be tasered? *NM* LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:07:12 PM 405 Views
most of them are resiting they resisting random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:13:29 PM 886 Views
but they aren't resisiting in a way that puts the officer in danger, i mean. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 09:22:06 PM 934 Views
but effective random thoughts - 25/08/2010 09:55:30 PM 811 Views
yes nothing says "better than arguing" than ELECTROCUTING SOMEONE LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:14:55 PM 941 Views
any physical altercation is dangerous for a police officer random thoughts - 25/08/2010 11:30:07 PM 800 Views
you see plenty of videos where the person wasn't being aggressive, though. LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:46:43 PM 923 Views
Sorry but he needed to be tasered random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:57:19 AM 939 Views
well we're getting a little off topic here and going to a sidebar soon.. LadyLorraine - 26/08/2010 03:36:43 AM 853 Views
And when someone dies because they get electrocuted? Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:52:13 AM 1097 Views
all the more reason to listen to a police officer if they point a taser at you *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 02:43:46 PM 397 Views
I believe Jefferson had a certain famous quote about that... *NM* Floffe - 25/08/2010 07:50:48 PM 431 Views
It was Franklin. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 943 Views
i do love that quote LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:17:11 PM 834 Views
They did. He says it in Congress and, if I recall correctly, Dickinson gets annoyed. Ghavrel - 25/08/2010 11:37:41 PM 782 Views
it's a lovely musical LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:47:29 PM 762 Views
Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Macharius - 25/08/2010 05:56:00 PM 848 Views
Re: Enforcers of the law are not supposed to be above it. Ryan - 26/08/2010 06:47:30 AM 985 Views
The law is not always just or correct. Legislators make mistakes and can be corrupt. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 25/08/2010 09:06:55 PM 405 Views
This feels like two separate issues to me. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:25:50 PM 996 Views
even if they are not restricted, driveways are private property LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 05:34:00 PM 938 Views
I don't think that's true. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:55:26 PM 850 Views
you don't need permission to walk up someone's driveway until they have posted a no trespassing sign random thoughts - 25/08/2010 06:00:02 PM 926 Views
yes, and that's a relatively expected activity LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 07:24:54 PM 943 Views
Should a person without a garage be penalized Ryan - 25/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 1006 Views
They're not being penalized; it works in the other direction. Sareitha Sedai - 25/08/2010 05:59:59 PM 1047 Views
I think... Hezzah - 25/08/2010 09:47:51 PM 905 Views
Or you could go the other way, and say it's legal for them to put a GPS tracker on your house. Gher - 25/08/2010 10:30:32 PM 797 Views
I wouldn't mind a GPS tracker on my house LadyLorraine - 25/08/2010 11:16:10 PM 833 Views
They need a fucking warrant. End of story. Fuckers *NM* Dan - 26/08/2010 12:13:04 AM 404 Views
ummmm.... damookster - 26/08/2010 03:35:30 AM 883 Views
I do believe that would require a warrant though *NM* random thoughts - 26/08/2010 04:57:36 AM 347 Views
The GPS in a phone being on will show up, though Floffe - 01/09/2010 12:36:13 PM 826 Views
I have 3 words for you... Bramhodoulos - 27/08/2010 01:59:13 PM 1106 Views
I have one word horseshit *NM* random thoughts - 27/08/2010 06:18:33 PM 403 Views
right damookster - 27/08/2010 10:19:53 PM 922 Views
*shrug* Old news, really. Joel - 02/09/2010 02:50:00 PM 879 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes