Keep in mind Jeordam probably doesn't believe history is that long. If I recall correctly he would estimate it at around 6000 years (please correct me if I am wrong).
Those people are flying in the face of physics and science from so many different angles that they are really right up there with the flat earthers.
Quite simply - crazy.
May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places you must walk.
Old Egyptian Blessing
Old Egyptian Blessing
Gay Marriage
12/08/2010 10:23:19 AM
- 1839 Views
I disagree on the latter part
12/08/2010 12:04:15 PM
- 1213 Views
I follow your point...
12/08/2010 12:14:17 PM
- 1197 Views
Suspect you would find plenty of denominations that would argue with you rather strenuously.
12/08/2010 12:24:55 PM
- 1193 Views
See, that's what I'm saying...
12/08/2010 07:37:26 PM
- 1157 Views
You didn't read my post.
12/08/2010 09:10:21 PM
- 1070 Views
Actually, you didn't read my post
12/08/2010 09:23:54 PM
- 1110 Views
Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM
- 1120 Views
Re: Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM
- 1076 Views
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. And no, he described it accurately. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:53:31 PM
- 565 Views
You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM
- 1214 Views
Re: You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM
- 1069 Views
Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM
- 1119 Views
Re: Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM
- 967 Views
Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:30:52 PM
- 1213 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:40:55 PM
- 1122 Views
Also
12/08/2010 10:02:44 PM
- 1163 Views
And wrong again.
12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM
- 1186 Views
Not so quick!
12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM
- 1023 Views
Yes, so quick!
12/08/2010 10:32:13 PM
- 971 Views
Let's be reasonable here
12/08/2010 10:41:53 PM
- 1080 Views
Why do you get to judge?
12/08/2010 10:48:57 PM
- 1107 Views
I don't
12/08/2010 10:53:21 PM
- 1000 Views
OK.
12/08/2010 10:58:22 PM
- 1115 Views
Re: OK.
12/08/2010 11:03:50 PM
- 1042 Views
Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:14:03 PM
- 1009 Views
Re: Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:23:35 PM
- 1124 Views
Then please stop.
12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM
- 1082 Views
What's wrong with discussion?
12/08/2010 11:05:48 PM
- 1021 Views
Discussion? Nothing. Your assertions about other people's views, something.
12/08/2010 11:09:48 PM
- 1052 Views
What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
- 922 Views
Re: What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:23:36 PM
- 1070 Views
Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:36:48 PM
- 1027 Views
Re: Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:46:22 PM
- 1138 Views
Not entirely true either... or, well, true as far as Brown goes.
12/08/2010 10:08:42 PM
- 1035 Views
Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:38:33 PM
- 1108 Views
Re: Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:55:05 PM
- 1043 Views
Gah.
12/08/2010 09:59:45 PM
- 992 Views
What a mature response.
12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM
- 1177 Views
I can't speak for Rebekah, but I don't think the issue is that your points are invalid per se.
12/08/2010 10:22:30 PM
- 1015 Views
Um
12/08/2010 09:46:43 PM
- 1142 Views
That's a very good question. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:49:05 PM
- 533 Views
It makes no sense
12/08/2010 04:29:24 PM
- 981 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:39:25 PM
- 1055 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:41:02 PM
- 1133 Views
Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:08:53 PM
- 971 Views
Re: Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:42:21 PM
- 1085 Views
What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
12/08/2010 09:45:33 PM
- 1142 Views
Re: What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
13/08/2010 11:04:02 AM
- 1077 Views
Wow, it's almost like an entire denomination believes that! *NM*
13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM
- 518 Views
13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM
- 880 Views
Yeah, that's the Roman Catholic basis against masturbation and contraception. *NM*
13/08/2010 04:12:00 PM
- 517 Views
Yes
13/08/2010 04:22:58 PM
- 930 Views
Dude....please at least have a working knowledge of the Bible before you spout off.
12/08/2010 10:47:13 PM
- 961 Views
secular marriage is decoupled from religious marriage
12/08/2010 02:50:43 PM
- 1154 Views
Simple, require the legal and religious marriage to be performed separately.
12/08/2010 02:58:43 PM
- 989 Views
And they are, in fact, separate right now in the US. They're just called the same thing.
12/08/2010 03:29:26 PM
- 1035 Views
It's not the same name that's confusing so much as the single ceremony. Or so it seems to me.
12/08/2010 03:37:20 PM
- 1045 Views
I disagree. I think giving the legal institution the same name as the sacrament is the problem.
12/08/2010 03:59:43 PM
- 1061 Views
What in the world would that accomplish?
12/08/2010 03:44:32 PM
- 1074 Views
Provide some much-needed clarity, evidently.
12/08/2010 03:49:33 PM
- 925 Views
the problem is it would be changing a centuries old tradition..
12/08/2010 04:26:47 PM
- 935 Views
heheheheheheheHAHAHAHEHEHehehehehahheeh*cough*
12/08/2010 04:55:09 PM
- 943 Views
thats OK I am sure you will get over it
12/08/2010 05:22:08 PM
- 978 Views
Just guessing, but I think it was the "centuries old tradition" that set off the giggle fit.
12/08/2010 07:25:38 PM
- 1100 Views
Really? I was hoping for something better
12/08/2010 10:06:00 PM
- 1032 Views
So government recognition makes your religion meaningful?
12/08/2010 10:11:54 PM
- 1120 Views
not my religion I'm agnostic
12/08/2010 10:34:40 PM
- 981 Views
I'm not far left, thank you very much. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:20:31 PM
- 589 Views
no but your are European and that slants your views *NM*
12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM
- 580 Views
Simples
12/08/2010 09:30:31 PM
- 1064 Views
there are about 140 post ranging from boyscouts to infant babtism
12/08/2010 10:57:46 PM
- 1060 Views
So.
14/08/2010 01:27:59 AM
- 899 Views
sorry I responded I forgot what a tool you are. my bad
14/08/2010 02:48:57 AM
- 1417 Views
You spout some utter gibberish then dish out insults when called on it? Very funny
15/08/2010 12:47:04 PM
- 1246 Views
Agreed *NM*
12/08/2010 03:45:04 PM
- 467 Views
I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:02:15 PM
- 861 Views
Re: I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:04:10 PM
- 1052 Views
A couple of things
12/08/2010 12:58:09 PM
- 1033 Views
there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 03:31:45 PM
- 1169 Views
Re: there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 04:01:32 PM
- 1053 Views
I should clarify that I support gay marriage
12/08/2010 05:20:36 PM
- 989 Views
One point about Prop. 8
12/08/2010 07:38:55 PM
- 1032 Views
I know that is the commonl;y held belief but I thinkit is wrong
12/08/2010 10:32:58 PM
- 954 Views
Religious institutions, though, pushed hard to pass it.
12/08/2010 10:42:33 PM
- 1041 Views
that doesn’t translate into people voting for religious reasons
12/08/2010 11:19:48 PM
- 861 Views
Bigotry and Fear that are supported and encouraged by religious institutions.
12/08/2010 11:32:30 PM
- 1019 Views
there are major flaws in your argument
12/08/2010 07:51:52 PM
- 1130 Views
Women can't be priests in the Catholic church.
12/08/2010 08:00:24 PM
- 810 Views
Forcing religious institutions to marry gay couples is hideously unconstitutional.
12/08/2010 04:18:59 PM
- 1079 Views
You are absolutely wrong
12/08/2010 07:57:19 PM
- 1073 Views
Your arguments are so specious and stupid I don't know where to begin.
13/08/2010 05:04:17 AM
- 994 Views
Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 07:11:15 PM
- 989 Views
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning...
12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM
- 1071 Views
Because your reasons for being against gay marriage are so specious *NM*
12/08/2010 07:59:42 PM
- 597 Views
I particularly enjoy the implied assumption that your a good enough judge of my motivations. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:24:14 PM
- 564 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 08:04:24 PM
- 1142 Views
+1
12/08/2010 08:06:19 PM
- 1180 Views
Stop with the pile on Camilla.
12/08/2010 09:22:35 PM
- 1106 Views
You would have said nothing if I had just said "agreed"
12/08/2010 09:27:33 PM
- 930 Views
Which speaks highly of you....
12/08/2010 09:36:30 PM
- 1107 Views
This is being very petty. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:41:26 PM
- 552 Views
As opposed to a snarky +1 comment? *NM*
12/08/2010 09:45:02 PM
- 571 Views
It's not snarky.
12/08/2010 09:47:47 PM
- 1045 Views
Its a +1 shorthand comment...
12/08/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 1333 Views
Wow. Those two characters allowed you to read Camilla's motivations?
12/08/2010 09:54:25 PM
- 961 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 09:13:07 PM
- 1142 Views
you are exactly why the state needs to make a clear seperation between the secular and religious
12/08/2010 09:33:22 PM
- 1019 Views
Ok, so if the state does then...
12/08/2010 09:44:31 PM
- 961 Views
No, marriage started because of property.
12/08/2010 09:59:14 PM
- 1055 Views
So then two things come to mind...
12/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 1033 Views
Only two?
12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM
- 1030 Views
That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:19:32 PM
- 1189 Views
Re: That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:30:14 PM
- 1059 Views
Oh, I hope not
13/08/2010 04:19:47 PM
- 1057 Views
yes but about half of the old testament deals with protecting those rights
13/08/2010 05:16:09 PM
- 1019 Views
The relationship between religion and rain go even farther back...
13/08/2010 06:15:32 PM
- 1005 Views
Actually, I agree with that
12/08/2010 10:01:37 PM
- 908 Views
See, what I don't get is why gay people care about
12/08/2010 08:18:45 PM
- 1016 Views
It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state.
12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM
- 1131 Views
I'm fairly sure Jonte was referring only to the "churches have to accept gay marriages" bit. *NM*
12/08/2010 08:44:52 PM
- 601 Views
Starting again
12/08/2010 08:23:08 PM
- 1103 Views
Not at all
12/08/2010 10:58:45 PM
- 1040 Views
Re: Not at all
13/08/2010 09:14:48 AM
- 837 Views
Agreed *NM*
13/08/2010 10:21:06 AM
- 437 Views
Oh dear
13/08/2010 10:30:45 AM
- 952 Views
I suppose you also think that religious Pacifists should be eligible for the draft?
12/08/2010 08:42:21 PM
- 1113 Views