It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state.
Phelix Send a noteboard - 12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM
having the approval of an organisation dedicated to an imaginary bigot in the sky.
There are far more important discrimination going on than not being able to get married in a specific church.
There are far more important discrimination going on than not being able to get married in a specific church.
Having a separate, but totally just the same legal situation, is a problem. Not being able to get married in the eyes of the state is the problem.
I know that if I wanted to go get married to Roland00, I'd first need to get his ass to move up here, but then I could go get my Methodist Reverend friend to officiate our marriage and in the eyes of that church, we'd be married. It'd be nice, and sweet, and I'd get lots of presents from my friends... and several cold shoulders from family members... but the state would still look at us as two legally distinct individuals.
Which is different than my sister who met her boyfriend, got knocked up, and decided she didn't want to have her baby out of wedlock... she went from dating to pregnant to engaged in less than five months. As soon as their signatures were dry on the paper, and turned into the court clerk, they were legally a unit in the eyes of the government. Her property became his, and his hers. They suddenly had thousands of legal rights that I could never have access to, if I decided to marry Matt. And he dragged himself to Washington.
I was Phelix on wotmania, I will always be Phelix in the "real" world, and now I am Phelix on RAFO.
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
Gay Marriage
12/08/2010 10:23:19 AM
- 1836 Views
I disagree on the latter part
12/08/2010 12:04:15 PM
- 1212 Views
I follow your point...
12/08/2010 12:14:17 PM
- 1193 Views
Suspect you would find plenty of denominations that would argue with you rather strenuously.
12/08/2010 12:24:55 PM
- 1190 Views
See, that's what I'm saying...
12/08/2010 07:37:26 PM
- 1154 Views
You didn't read my post.
12/08/2010 09:10:21 PM
- 1067 Views
Actually, you didn't read my post
12/08/2010 09:23:54 PM
- 1107 Views
Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM
- 1117 Views
Re: Um, you're wrong.
12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM
- 1075 Views
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. And no, he described it accurately. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:53:31 PM
- 564 Views
You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM
- 1210 Views
Re: You're still wrong.
12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM
- 1068 Views
Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM
- 1115 Views
Re: Again, you are still wrong.
12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM
- 964 Views
Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:30:52 PM
- 1212 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club"
12/08/2010 10:40:55 PM
- 1119 Views
Also
12/08/2010 10:02:44 PM
- 1162 Views
And wrong again.
12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM
- 1185 Views
Not so quick!
12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM
- 1020 Views
Yes, so quick!
12/08/2010 10:32:13 PM
- 968 Views
Let's be reasonable here
12/08/2010 10:41:53 PM
- 1079 Views
Why do you get to judge?
12/08/2010 10:48:57 PM
- 1105 Views
I don't
12/08/2010 10:53:21 PM
- 998 Views
OK.
12/08/2010 10:58:22 PM
- 1112 Views
Re: OK.
12/08/2010 11:03:50 PM
- 1042 Views
Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:14:03 PM
- 1006 Views
Re: Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith.
12/08/2010 11:23:35 PM
- 1124 Views
Then please stop.
12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM
- 1081 Views
What's wrong with discussion?
12/08/2010 11:05:48 PM
- 1021 Views
Discussion? Nothing. Your assertions about other people's views, something.
12/08/2010 11:09:48 PM
- 1049 Views
What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM
- 921 Views
Re: What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay?
12/08/2010 10:23:36 PM
- 1067 Views
Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:36:48 PM
- 1023 Views
Re: Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer.
12/08/2010 10:46:22 PM
- 1138 Views
Not entirely true either... or, well, true as far as Brown goes.
12/08/2010 10:08:42 PM
- 1032 Views
Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:38:33 PM
- 1105 Views
Re: Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need
12/08/2010 09:55:05 PM
- 1040 Views
Gah.
12/08/2010 09:59:45 PM
- 990 Views
What a mature response.
12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM
- 1173 Views
I can't speak for Rebekah, but I don't think the issue is that your points are invalid per se.
12/08/2010 10:22:30 PM
- 1012 Views
Um
12/08/2010 09:46:43 PM
- 1139 Views
That's a very good question. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:49:05 PM
- 532 Views
It makes no sense
12/08/2010 04:29:24 PM
- 977 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:39:25 PM
- 1054 Views
Re: It makes no sense
12/08/2010 07:41:02 PM
- 1130 Views
Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:08:53 PM
- 970 Views
Re: Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder...
12/08/2010 09:42:21 PM
- 1084 Views
What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
12/08/2010 09:45:33 PM
- 1138 Views
Re: What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin?
13/08/2010 11:04:02 AM
- 1074 Views
Wow, it's almost like an entire denomination believes that! *NM*
13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM
- 517 Views
13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM
- 879 Views
Yeah, that's the Roman Catholic basis against masturbation and contraception. *NM*
13/08/2010 04:12:00 PM
- 516 Views
Yes
13/08/2010 04:22:58 PM
- 927 Views
Dude....please at least have a working knowledge of the Bible before you spout off.
12/08/2010 10:47:13 PM
- 960 Views
secular marriage is decoupled from religious marriage
12/08/2010 02:50:43 PM
- 1151 Views
Simple, require the legal and religious marriage to be performed separately.
12/08/2010 02:58:43 PM
- 987 Views
And they are, in fact, separate right now in the US. They're just called the same thing.
12/08/2010 03:29:26 PM
- 1034 Views
It's not the same name that's confusing so much as the single ceremony. Or so it seems to me.
12/08/2010 03:37:20 PM
- 1044 Views
I disagree. I think giving the legal institution the same name as the sacrament is the problem.
12/08/2010 03:59:43 PM
- 1058 Views
What in the world would that accomplish?
12/08/2010 03:44:32 PM
- 1071 Views
Provide some much-needed clarity, evidently.
12/08/2010 03:49:33 PM
- 922 Views
the problem is it would be changing a centuries old tradition..
12/08/2010 04:26:47 PM
- 932 Views
heheheheheheheHAHAHAHEHEHehehehehahheeh*cough*
12/08/2010 04:55:09 PM
- 941 Views
thats OK I am sure you will get over it
12/08/2010 05:22:08 PM
- 977 Views
Just guessing, but I think it was the "centuries old tradition" that set off the giggle fit.
12/08/2010 07:25:38 PM
- 1099 Views
Really? I was hoping for something better
12/08/2010 10:06:00 PM
- 1031 Views
So government recognition makes your religion meaningful?
12/08/2010 10:11:54 PM
- 1117 Views
not my religion I'm agnostic
12/08/2010 10:34:40 PM
- 980 Views
I'm not far left, thank you very much. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:20:31 PM
- 588 Views
no but your are European and that slants your views *NM*
12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM
- 579 Views
Simples
12/08/2010 09:30:31 PM
- 1061 Views
there are about 140 post ranging from boyscouts to infant babtism
12/08/2010 10:57:46 PM
- 1059 Views
So.
14/08/2010 01:27:59 AM
- 898 Views
sorry I responded I forgot what a tool you are. my bad
14/08/2010 02:48:57 AM
- 1416 Views
You spout some utter gibberish then dish out insults when called on it? Very funny
15/08/2010 12:47:04 PM
- 1243 Views
Agreed *NM*
12/08/2010 03:45:04 PM
- 466 Views
I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:02:15 PM
- 860 Views
Re: I love you, Camilla
12/08/2010 04:04:10 PM
- 1049 Views
A couple of things
12/08/2010 12:58:09 PM
- 1029 Views
there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 03:31:45 PM
- 1166 Views
Re: there is major flaw in your argument
12/08/2010 04:01:32 PM
- 1051 Views
I should clarify that I support gay marriage
12/08/2010 05:20:36 PM
- 986 Views
One point about Prop. 8
12/08/2010 07:38:55 PM
- 1029 Views
I know that is the commonl;y held belief but I thinkit is wrong
12/08/2010 10:32:58 PM
- 952 Views
Religious institutions, though, pushed hard to pass it.
12/08/2010 10:42:33 PM
- 1038 Views
that doesn’t translate into people voting for religious reasons
12/08/2010 11:19:48 PM
- 858 Views
Bigotry and Fear that are supported and encouraged by religious institutions.
12/08/2010 11:32:30 PM
- 1018 Views
there are major flaws in your argument
12/08/2010 07:51:52 PM
- 1129 Views
Women can't be priests in the Catholic church.
12/08/2010 08:00:24 PM
- 809 Views
Forcing religious institutions to marry gay couples is hideously unconstitutional.
12/08/2010 04:18:59 PM
- 1076 Views
You are absolutely wrong
12/08/2010 07:57:19 PM
- 1072 Views
Your arguments are so specious and stupid I don't know where to begin.
13/08/2010 05:04:17 AM
- 991 Views
Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 07:11:15 PM
- 987 Views
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning...
12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM
- 1068 Views
Because your reasons for being against gay marriage are so specious *NM*
12/08/2010 07:59:42 PM
- 596 Views
I particularly enjoy the implied assumption that your a good enough judge of my motivations. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:24:14 PM
- 563 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 08:04:24 PM
- 1139 Views
+1
12/08/2010 08:06:19 PM
- 1177 Views
Stop with the pile on Camilla.
12/08/2010 09:22:35 PM
- 1105 Views
You would have said nothing if I had just said "agreed"
12/08/2010 09:27:33 PM
- 927 Views
Which speaks highly of you....
12/08/2010 09:36:30 PM
- 1106 Views
This is being very petty. *NM*
12/08/2010 09:41:26 PM
- 551 Views
As opposed to a snarky +1 comment? *NM*
12/08/2010 09:45:02 PM
- 570 Views
It's not snarky.
12/08/2010 09:47:47 PM
- 1043 Views
Its a +1 shorthand comment...
12/08/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 1332 Views
Wow. Those two characters allowed you to read Camilla's motivations?
12/08/2010 09:54:25 PM
- 959 Views
Re: Why do people equate....
12/08/2010 09:13:07 PM
- 1138 Views
you are exactly why the state needs to make a clear seperation between the secular and religious
12/08/2010 09:33:22 PM
- 1017 Views
Ok, so if the state does then...
12/08/2010 09:44:31 PM
- 957 Views
No, marriage started because of property.
12/08/2010 09:59:14 PM
- 1054 Views
So then two things come to mind...
12/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 1031 Views
Only two?
12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM
- 1028 Views
That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:19:32 PM
- 1188 Views
Re: That's a little difficult to do
13/08/2010 03:30:14 PM
- 1056 Views
yes but about half of the old testament deals with protecting those rights
13/08/2010 05:16:09 PM
- 1016 Views
The relationship between religion and rain go even farther back...
13/08/2010 06:15:32 PM
- 1003 Views
Actually, I agree with that
12/08/2010 10:01:37 PM
- 905 Views
See, what I don't get is why gay people care about
12/08/2010 08:18:45 PM
- 1013 Views
It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state.
12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM
- 1130 Views
I'm fairly sure Jonte was referring only to the "churches have to accept gay marriages" bit. *NM*
12/08/2010 08:44:52 PM
- 600 Views
Starting again
12/08/2010 08:23:08 PM
- 1100 Views
Not at all
12/08/2010 10:58:45 PM
- 1040 Views
Re: Not at all
13/08/2010 09:14:48 AM
- 836 Views
Agreed *NM*
13/08/2010 10:21:06 AM
- 435 Views
Oh dear
13/08/2010 10:30:45 AM
- 951 Views
I suppose you also think that religious Pacifists should be eligible for the draft?
12/08/2010 08:42:21 PM
- 1110 Views