Active Users:1195 Time:23/11/2024 03:40:36 AM
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning... Legolas Send a noteboard - 12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM
and now means "anti-gay" more than "afraid of homosexuality".

And then since reasons against gay marriage are generally based on being anti-gay, despite Cannoli's hilarious attempts to come up with other reasons, well, there you go.
Reply to message
Gay Marriage - 12/08/2010 10:23:19 AM 1835 Views
I disagree on the latter part - 12/08/2010 12:04:15 PM 1210 Views
I follow your point... - 12/08/2010 12:14:17 PM 1192 Views
Suspect you would find plenty of denominations that would argue with you rather strenuously. - 12/08/2010 12:24:55 PM 1189 Views
See, that's what I'm saying... - 12/08/2010 07:37:26 PM 1153 Views
She didn't say that gays ought not be married. - 12/08/2010 07:45:37 PM 1010 Views
You didn't read my post. - 12/08/2010 09:10:21 PM 1066 Views
Actually, you didn't read my post - 12/08/2010 09:23:54 PM 1107 Views
Um, you're wrong. - 12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM 1116 Views
Re: Um, you're wrong. - 12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM 1073 Views
You're still wrong. - 12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM 1210 Views
Re: You're still wrong. - 12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM 1066 Views
Again, you are still wrong. - 12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM 1114 Views
Re: Again, you are still wrong. - 12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM 963 Views
Wrong definition of "club" - 12/08/2010 10:30:52 PM 1212 Views
My clubs are cooler than yours. *NM* - 12/08/2010 10:35:13 PM 578 Views
I play golf with mine. *NM* - 12/08/2010 10:43:01 PM 589 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club" - 12/08/2010 10:40:55 PM 1117 Views
Are you a member of one of those churches? - 12/08/2010 10:44:12 PM 1133 Views
Also also: - 12/08/2010 10:46:05 PM 1143 Views
Re: Are you a member of one of those churches? - 12/08/2010 10:49:44 PM 1047 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club" - 12/08/2010 10:47:20 PM 1153 Views
I don't think he means that kind of club. - 12/08/2010 10:31:41 PM 1027 Views
Also - 12/08/2010 10:02:44 PM 1160 Views
And wrong again. - 12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM 1183 Views
Not so quick! - 12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM 1020 Views
Yes, so quick! - 12/08/2010 10:32:13 PM 967 Views
Let's be reasonable here - 12/08/2010 10:41:53 PM 1078 Views
Why do you get to judge? - 12/08/2010 10:48:57 PM 1104 Views
I don't - 12/08/2010 10:53:21 PM 998 Views
OK. - 12/08/2010 10:58:22 PM 1111 Views
Re: OK. - 12/08/2010 11:03:50 PM 1042 Views
Then please stop. - 12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM 1080 Views
What's wrong with discussion? - 12/08/2010 11:05:48 PM 1019 Views
Discussion? Nothing. Your assertions about other people's views, something. - 12/08/2010 11:09:48 PM 1047 Views
Really? - 12/08/2010 11:13:46 PM 1077 Views
Yes. That is incorrect. - 12/08/2010 11:18:05 PM 1039 Views
What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay? - 12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 920 Views
Re: What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay? - 12/08/2010 10:23:36 PM 1065 Views
Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer. - 12/08/2010 10:36:48 PM 1022 Views
Re: Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer. - 12/08/2010 10:46:22 PM 1137 Views
Apparently you do believe that you are more qualified - 12/08/2010 10:57:00 PM 1009 Views
You are wrong - 12/08/2010 11:11:37 PM 858 Views
Really? - 12/08/2010 11:19:10 PM 948 Views
Not entirely true either... or, well, true as far as Brown goes. - 12/08/2010 10:08:42 PM 1030 Views
Heh... we discuss restaurants a post or two over there.. ---> - 12/08/2010 10:10:26 PM 1127 Views
Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need - 12/08/2010 09:38:33 PM 1105 Views
Re: Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need - 12/08/2010 09:55:05 PM 1038 Views
Gah. - 12/08/2010 09:59:45 PM 989 Views
Yes yes yes. It was ungracious. I got bored. *NM* - 12/08/2010 10:03:17 PM 541 Views
What a mature response. - 12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM 1172 Views
Yes. - 12/08/2010 10:21:38 PM 1112 Views
Re: Yes. - 12/08/2010 10:35:51 PM 1055 Views
I can't speak for Rebekah, but I don't think the issue is that your points are invalid per se. - 12/08/2010 10:22:30 PM 1011 Views
I think my point was unclear in that post - 12/08/2010 10:55:34 PM 1082 Views
It seems that by your (to me nebulous) definition - 12/08/2010 11:05:01 PM 1085 Views
Re: I think my point was unclear in that post - 13/08/2010 10:58:28 AM 990 Views
+1 - 13/08/2010 09:16:24 AM 876 Views
Hehe - 13/08/2010 10:46:25 AM 930 Views
Um - 12/08/2010 09:46:43 PM 1138 Views
That's a very good question. *NM* - 12/08/2010 09:49:05 PM 532 Views
So good it doesn't even need an answer, apparently *NM* - 12/08/2010 10:26:41 PM 574 Views
So good I responded to it someplace else. *NM* - 12/08/2010 10:56:05 PM 468 Views
It makes no sense - 12/08/2010 04:29:24 PM 975 Views
Re: It makes no sense - 12/08/2010 07:39:25 PM 1054 Views
Re: It makes no sense - 12/08/2010 07:41:02 PM 1128 Views
It's not sanctioning anything - 12/08/2010 09:25:44 PM 1081 Views
Re: It's not sanctioning anything - 12/08/2010 09:28:45 PM 1051 Views
Nonsense - 12/08/2010 09:35:25 PM 1003 Views
Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder... - 12/08/2010 09:08:53 PM 968 Views
Re: Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder... - 12/08/2010 09:42:21 PM 1083 Views
Suspect you've not read that either. - 12/08/2010 09:43:32 PM 1013 Views
What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin? - 12/08/2010 09:45:33 PM 1138 Views
Infant baptism, obviously. - 12/08/2010 09:51:48 PM 1130 Views
*NM* - 12/08/2010 09:53:17 PM 378 Views
*groan* I forgot that one! - 12/08/2010 10:09:07 PM 1083 Views
Re: What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin? - 13/08/2010 11:04:02 AM 1074 Views
Wow, it's almost like an entire denomination believes that! *NM* - 13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM 517 Views
really? - 13/08/2010 03:42:42 PM 948 Views
- 13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM 878 Views
Yeah, that's the Roman Catholic basis against masturbation and contraception. *NM* - 13/08/2010 04:12:00 PM 516 Views
Yes - 13/08/2010 04:22:58 PM 925 Views
Which is interesting - 13/08/2010 04:28:09 PM 911 Views
Yes - 13/08/2010 04:29:25 PM 895 Views
Original poster. *NM* - 13/08/2010 04:32:18 PM 570 Views
- 13/08/2010 04:34:30 PM 922 Views
Dude....please at least have a working knowledge of the Bible before you spout off. - 12/08/2010 10:47:13 PM 958 Views
I like the part in 1 Corinthians (is it chapter 6?) - 12/08/2010 10:49:55 PM 855 Views
Ya know?!? - 12/08/2010 10:55:27 PM 967 Views
I'm not sure you're correct there. - 12/08/2010 04:33:02 PM 1072 Views
Re: I'm not sure you're correct there. - 12/08/2010 07:40:16 PM 1086 Views
There is a difference... - 12/08/2010 09:02:20 PM 1119 Views
No you don't. - 12/08/2010 09:16:52 PM 1101 Views
That's another concern - 12/08/2010 12:39:53 PM 1162 Views
Not quite my point - 12/08/2010 09:19:50 PM 1024 Views
secular marriage is decoupled from religious marriage - 12/08/2010 02:50:43 PM 1150 Views
Simple, require the legal and religious marriage to be performed separately. - 12/08/2010 02:58:43 PM 986 Views
What in the world would that accomplish? - 12/08/2010 03:44:32 PM 1069 Views
Provide some much-needed clarity, evidently. - 12/08/2010 03:49:33 PM 920 Views
the problem is it would be changing a centuries old tradition.. - 12/08/2010 04:26:47 PM 931 Views
heheheheheheheHAHAHAHEHEHehehehehahheeh*cough* - 12/08/2010 04:55:09 PM 939 Views
thats OK I am sure you will get over it - 12/08/2010 05:22:08 PM 976 Views
Just guessing, but I think it was the "centuries old tradition" that set off the giggle fit. - 12/08/2010 07:25:38 PM 1099 Views
Really? I was hoping for something better - 12/08/2010 10:06:00 PM 1030 Views
So government recognition makes your religion meaningful? - 12/08/2010 10:11:54 PM 1115 Views
not my religion I'm agnostic - 12/08/2010 10:34:40 PM 979 Views
OK, but the point remains the same. - 12/08/2010 10:51:59 PM 1091 Views
Of course it would - 12/08/2010 11:10:03 PM 1163 Views
I'm not far left, thank you very much. *NM* - 12/08/2010 10:20:31 PM 588 Views
no but your are European and that slants your views *NM* - 12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM 579 Views
Sure, but in this case it has little to do with left or right. - 12/08/2010 10:40:42 PM 1035 Views
that is what I said when I metioned you were European *NM* - 12/08/2010 11:11:31 PM 580 Views
Simples - 12/08/2010 09:30:31 PM 1061 Views
there are about 140 post ranging from boyscouts to infant babtism - 12/08/2010 10:57:46 PM 1058 Views
So. - 14/08/2010 01:27:59 AM 896 Views
sorry I responded I forgot what a tool you are. my bad - 14/08/2010 02:48:57 AM 1415 Views
Agreed *NM* - 12/08/2010 03:45:04 PM 466 Views
I love you, Camilla - 12/08/2010 04:02:15 PM 858 Views
Re: I love you, Camilla - 12/08/2010 04:04:10 PM 1048 Views
Is there an all above option? *NM* - 12/08/2010 04:23:24 PM 621 Views
Naturally. - 12/08/2010 04:25:14 PM 1038 Views
I know I do *NM* - 12/08/2010 05:17:35 PM 545 Views
Another thing - 12/08/2010 07:42:21 PM 1125 Views
A couple of things - 12/08/2010 12:58:09 PM 1029 Views
I disagree - 12/08/2010 07:47:26 PM 1148 Views
Well, you're within your rights to certainly - 12/08/2010 08:24:30 PM 1123 Views
there is major flaw in your argument - 12/08/2010 03:31:45 PM 1164 Views
Re: there is major flaw in your argument - 12/08/2010 04:01:32 PM 1049 Views
I should clarify that I support gay marriage - 12/08/2010 05:20:36 PM 986 Views
One point about Prop. 8 - 12/08/2010 07:38:55 PM 1028 Views
I know that is the commonl;y held belief but I thinkit is wrong - 12/08/2010 10:32:58 PM 951 Views
Religious institutions, though, pushed hard to pass it. - 12/08/2010 10:42:33 PM 1037 Views
there are major flaws in your argument - 12/08/2010 07:51:52 PM 1127 Views
Women can't be priests in the Catholic church. - 12/08/2010 08:00:24 PM 807 Views
Hehe. You beat me by 6 seconds. *NM* - 12/08/2010 08:03:28 PM 496 Views
Great minds and all. *NM* - 12/08/2010 08:06:01 PM 501 Views
I was writing a reply to this post... - 12/08/2010 03:51:01 PM 1052 Views
I feel your pain *NM* - 12/08/2010 07:52:28 PM 580 Views
Forcing religious institutions to marry gay couples is hideously unconstitutional. - 12/08/2010 04:18:59 PM 1076 Views
100% agreed. - 12/08/2010 05:05:35 PM 1131 Views
This. *NM* - 12/08/2010 07:36:57 PM 424 Views
You are absolutely wrong - 12/08/2010 07:57:19 PM 1070 Views
By that token - 12/08/2010 08:00:30 PM 950 Views
My God.... - 12/08/2010 09:49:18 PM 1019 Views
no You are absolutely wrong - 12/08/2010 10:08:57 PM 959 Views
Well, that was horrifyingly stupid. - 13/08/2010 12:57:46 AM 1042 Views
I am a Christian who wholeheartedly supports Gay Marriage. - 12/08/2010 06:49:28 PM 1156 Views
Fair enough. - 12/08/2010 08:01:37 PM 1087 Views
Why do people equate.... - 12/08/2010 07:11:15 PM 986 Views
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning... - 12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM 1068 Views
So then.... - 12/08/2010 07:39:24 PM 992 Views
Well, strongly anti-gay, yes. - 12/08/2010 07:43:40 PM 843 Views
Homophobic is generally "anti-gay" or "anti-queer"... - 12/08/2010 07:46:22 PM 1146 Views
Re: Why do people equate.... - 12/08/2010 08:04:24 PM 1138 Views
+1 - 12/08/2010 08:06:19 PM 1176 Views
Stop with the pile on Camilla. - 12/08/2010 09:22:35 PM 1103 Views
You would have said nothing if I had just said "agreed" - 12/08/2010 09:27:33 PM 925 Views
Which speaks highly of you.... - 12/08/2010 09:36:30 PM 1105 Views
This is being very petty. *NM* - 12/08/2010 09:41:26 PM 551 Views
As opposed to a snarky +1 comment? *NM* - 12/08/2010 09:45:02 PM 570 Views
It's not snarky. - 12/08/2010 09:47:47 PM 1041 Views
Its a +1 shorthand comment... - 12/08/2010 09:52:04 PM 1331 Views
Wow. Those two characters allowed you to read Camilla's motivations? - 12/08/2010 09:54:25 PM 958 Views
*shrug* - 12/08/2010 09:58:42 PM 1166 Views
Yes, I am terribly selfish - 13/08/2010 09:10:54 AM 946 Views
Re: Why do people equate.... - 12/08/2010 09:13:07 PM 1137 Views
Re: Why do people equate.... - 12/08/2010 09:26:41 PM 1046 Views
LOL - 12/08/2010 09:42:32 PM 1018 Views
Re: LOL - 13/08/2010 09:12:29 AM 966 Views
you are exactly why the state needs to make a clear seperation between the secular and religious - 12/08/2010 09:33:22 PM 1017 Views
Ok, so if the state does then... - 12/08/2010 09:44:31 PM 957 Views
No, marriage started because of property. - 12/08/2010 09:59:14 PM 1054 Views
So then two things come to mind... - 12/08/2010 10:04:39 PM 1029 Views
Only two? - 12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM 1027 Views
Is this the same guy... - 12/08/2010 10:43:02 PM 939 Views
I thought the cow died in an accident, but yes... that guy. - 12/08/2010 10:58:46 PM 1011 Views
That's a little difficult to do - 13/08/2010 03:19:32 PM 1186 Views
Re: That's a little difficult to do - 13/08/2010 03:30:14 PM 1055 Views
Oh, I hope not - 13/08/2010 04:19:47 PM 1053 Views
I may be wrong - 13/08/2010 04:24:28 PM 1007 Views
Property isn't just agricultural. - 13/08/2010 06:11:12 PM 937 Views
True enough - 16/08/2010 03:12:31 PM 1251 Views
yes but about half of the old testament deals with protecting those rights - 13/08/2010 05:16:09 PM 1015 Views
The relationship between religion and rain go even farther back... - 13/08/2010 06:15:32 PM 1001 Views
to me it is a beside the point when it comes to the law - 13/08/2010 06:25:50 PM 1028 Views
moot, not mute - 13/08/2010 08:48:04 PM 1252 Views
damn - 13/08/2010 08:52:23 PM 1096 Views
Actually, I agree with that - 12/08/2010 10:01:37 PM 903 Views
See, now this, I could deal with.... - 12/08/2010 10:06:15 PM 900 Views
So is it that you are hung up on the name then? - 13/08/2010 03:29:02 PM 971 Views
Rights.... - 12/08/2010 09:34:45 PM 990 Views
See, what I don't get is why gay people care about - 12/08/2010 08:18:45 PM 1012 Views
It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state. - 12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM 1128 Views
I'm fairly sure Jonte was referring only to the "churches have to accept gay marriages" bit. *NM* - 12/08/2010 08:44:52 PM 600 Views
Hmmm... Then I shall reply to that part here. - 12/08/2010 08:50:10 PM 1126 Views
Oh, so it is an american thing, then. *NM* - 14/08/2010 08:58:28 AM 542 Views
Starting again - 12/08/2010 08:23:08 PM 1099 Views
Not at all - 12/08/2010 10:58:45 PM 1040 Views
Re: Not at all - 13/08/2010 09:14:48 AM 835 Views
Agreed *NM* - 13/08/2010 10:21:06 AM 435 Views
Oh dear - 13/08/2010 10:30:45 AM 950 Views
But what if I like being selfish and evil? *NM* - 13/08/2010 11:25:01 AM 566 Views
Well, being English might help you get away with it - 13/08/2010 11:26:17 AM 829 Views
I'm curious - 13/08/2010 01:49:15 PM 995 Views
- 13/08/2010 01:54:19 PM 886 Views
Okay, good. - 13/08/2010 01:58:14 PM 1059 Views
I suppose you also think that religious Pacifists should be eligible for the draft? - 12/08/2010 08:42:21 PM 1109 Views
very nicely said *NM* - 13/08/2010 02:16:53 PM 450 Views

Reply to Message