Active Users:1101 Time:14/11/2024 06:31:20 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel Camilla Send a noteboard - 11/08/2010 05:09:23 PM
Oooooh. Rorschach.

Although he never wears his Rorschach outfit when he carries the sign...

Actually if you watch very carefully it's the SAME outfit sans the hat and mask.

Mmmnot when he buys the New Frontiersman on page 3 of Chapter III.

It is an entirely different jacket, and a different pair of trousers. And outside the funeral he has a shorter jacket, and different trousers as well (when he is Rorschach, his trousers are stripey).

Now I have to go and check!

(I recall it being the same, but I shall bow to your more recent knowledge. Perhaps my memory is simply faulty.)


I have a slight obsession when it comes to Rorschach. It is a little strange. He is politically waaaaaaaay off on the right. But I love him.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Let's ban all Christian Marriage. Dannymac - 07/08/2010 06:36:13 AM 1530 Views
Nice satire, but it raises another point for me. Helene - 07/08/2010 07:20:49 AM 958 Views
One small problem... Phelix - 07/08/2010 08:02:34 AM 978 Views
Re tax. Rebekah - 07/08/2010 08:47:22 AM 1011 Views
That seems sensible to me. SilverWarder - 09/08/2010 08:13:26 PM 854 Views
Not sure what you mean by "demoted." Dannymac - 07/08/2010 03:50:02 PM 1013 Views
Nice. *NM* Camilla - 07/08/2010 08:58:20 AM 583 Views
That would only be appropriate if Christians wanted to ban secular unions of normal people. Cannoli - 07/08/2010 11:51:29 AM 1180 Views
Hey, look! There was a point over there! Dannymac - 07/08/2010 03:46:41 PM 992 Views
Who else should make those decisions? Cannoli - 07/08/2010 08:00:39 PM 940 Views
I'd totally... Ectheledhel - 08/08/2010 04:14:15 AM 905 Views
I'd totally... ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:17:30 AM 1052 Views
You'd defend this idiot? *NM* Ectheledhel - 08/08/2010 06:40:34 AM 472 Views
Indeed ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 990 Views
I used to think Joel was the biggest rambler on this site. I am seriously reconsidering. everynametaken - 08/08/2010 05:24:56 AM 977 Views
And my assessment of one poster as the most content-poor, non-contributing slug is unchanged Cannoli - 08/08/2010 07:17:02 PM 891 Views
Um, ok. *NM* everynametaken - 10/08/2010 12:48:19 AM 474 Views
*Shakes Head* Dannymac - 08/08/2010 06:23:47 AM 860 Views
I highly doubt Cannoli is "scared" of homosexuals *NM* ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:29:54 AM 503 Views
Perhaps not in the physical sense. Great Lord of Chaos - 08/08/2010 06:35:53 AM 953 Views
Re: Perhaps not in the physical sense. ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:46:56 AM 914 Views
Gah! You did that on purpose! Vodalus - 09/08/2010 01:05:13 AM 870 Views
whoops *NM* ßelals Girl - 09/08/2010 02:22:49 AM 437 Views
Re: *Shakes Head* Cannoli - 08/08/2010 07:43:11 PM 906 Views
I still do not see how you think marriage is a "pointless" institution LadyLorraine - 08/08/2010 08:05:45 PM 1006 Views
No, I was referring to same-sex marriage. Real marriage hardly counts as a novelty. *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 02:28:43 PM 416 Views
This must be the "thought out reaction" I've heard so much about. Dannymac - 08/08/2010 10:45:59 PM 851 Views
You cannot be that stupid. Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:10:55 PM 1137 Views
There's a lot of ridiculous arguments here, but I'll focus on just one of them... Legolas - 11/08/2010 03:38:05 PM 1014 Views
Incorrect. Genders are not treated equally. Dreaded Anomaly - 11/08/2010 07:53:00 PM 1225 Views
all you need is enough support to pass an amendment random thoughts - 08/08/2010 02:46:08 PM 846 Views
A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 08/08/2010 11:51:24 PM 881 Views
And what is wrong with polygamy? *NM* Ectheledhel - 09/08/2010 10:36:53 AM 474 Views
Did I say there was anything? Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:03:10 AM 998 Views
Plolygamy and incest are not on the same level of bad. Camilla - 09/08/2010 11:00:07 AM 918 Views
Is that assumption valid? Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:36:26 AM 871 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? Camilla - 09/08/2010 11:46:42 AM 854 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? Isaac - 09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM 965 Views
Not really snoopcester - 09/08/2010 01:20:46 PM 823 Views
Re: Not really Isaac - 09/08/2010 01:27:04 PM 954 Views
Re: Not really snoopcester - 09/08/2010 02:14:43 PM 835 Views
Re: Not really Isaac - 09/08/2010 03:06:31 PM 980 Views
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives. Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM 995 Views
... Camilla - 11/08/2010 03:22:50 PM 875 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too snoopcester - 09/08/2010 11:25:39 AM 883 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:51:50 AM 844 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too snoopcester - 09/08/2010 01:18:35 PM 939 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 09/08/2010 02:54:19 PM 959 Views
Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage LadyLorraine - 09/08/2010 06:13:30 PM 1009 Views
Re: Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage Isaac - 10/08/2010 01:24:06 AM 820 Views
Now I think about it, I'm not sure. Dannymac - 10/08/2010 04:09:43 PM 935 Views
Re: Now I think about it, I'm not sure. Isaac - 10/08/2010 06:12:39 PM 820 Views
Great post Danny SilverWarder - 09/08/2010 08:22:27 PM 690 Views
It should be noted again... Jeordam - 09/08/2010 08:59:32 PM 985 Views
and how is it not a right? LadyLorraine - 09/08/2010 09:19:12 PM 857 Views
My definition of rights... Jeordam - 09/08/2010 10:47:16 PM 985 Views
mmm, but the UN has legally stated marriage as a right. LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 02:52:03 AM 750 Views
+1 Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 03:11:22 AM 1036 Views
Article 16 probably not a great example Isaac - 10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM 847 Views
You could just as easily move the emphasis... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 04:08:46 AM 972 Views
If we need a more specific resolution... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 04:22:12 AM 1157 Views
No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Isaac - 10/08/2010 05:25:57 AM 845 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 03:04:39 PM 1159 Views
That's really a ridiculous stance, you do realize. Legolas - 10/08/2010 03:23:02 PM 811 Views
The point is that marriage IS a right, one which cannot be denied based upon sexual orientation *NM* Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:04:16 PM 675 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Isaac - 10/08/2010 03:46:56 PM 1036 Views
It doesn't say a man can only marry a woman or vice versa, though. Dreaded Anomaly - 10/08/2010 04:24:17 AM 844 Views
It also doesn't say they can Isaac - 10/08/2010 04:41:18 AM 849 Views
You're missing the point. It's not about gay marriage. Legolas - 10/08/2010 11:20:59 AM 841 Views
No, I got that, I'm pointing out how it does so Isaac - 10/08/2010 01:47:00 PM 865 Views
I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point. LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 06:09:32 PM 838 Views
Re: I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point. Isaac - 10/08/2010 06:33:56 PM 771 Views
It's mentioned as a right in some SC decision quoted in that Walker opinion. *NM* Legolas - 10/08/2010 06:51:13 PM 425 Views
To clarify for you SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 05:36:14 AM 773 Views
The UNSC is actually the UN's enforcement body... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:16:31 PM 1218 Views
I'm not sure that I would call the Security Council the 'Enforcement Body' SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 08:43:02 PM 820 Views
The fact that it is capable of authorizing the use of military force makes it an enforcement body Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 10:33:59 PM 1082 Views
Disagree - but it's most a matter of definition there SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 04:31:53 PM 987 Views
What the UN thinks is *completely* worthless.... Jeordam - 10/08/2010 06:43:15 PM 782 Views
and the Constitution dictates nothing about marriage. *NM* LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 11:46:24 PM 454 Views
That means it is up to the people. And they say "No." *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:13:12 PM 459 Views
No, but it does dictate things about rights and discrimination SilverWarder - 12/08/2010 03:48:02 PM 1027 Views
Why don't YOU back up your assertion that the right to marry exists? *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:16:02 PM 473 Views
The actual ruling on Prop 8 specifices marriage as a freedom, not a right. Dreaded Anomaly - 10/08/2010 12:02:17 AM 923 Views
Out of curiosity, what would you say to using the Ninth Amendment, possibly in conjunction... Vodalus - 10/08/2010 12:20:19 AM 1002 Views
I agree LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 06:11:19 PM 728 Views
Yeah but this can't be used to prove that it IS a right... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:30:57 PM 1081 Views
Note it all you want... Dannymac - 10/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 721 Views
No, they seek to expand the terms of the partnership. Homosexuals can & do get married normally *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:14:25 PM 479 Views
The best one yet. Camilla - 10/08/2010 07:59:17 PM 969 Views
Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 08:49:24 PM 846 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane Camilla - 10/08/2010 09:03:11 PM 951 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 04:35:03 PM 833 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane Camilla - 11/08/2010 04:41:23 PM 955 Views
Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 05:06:47 PM 930 Views
Re: Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel Camilla - 11/08/2010 05:09:23 PM 919 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes