We can't be in violation of it, not that it would matter if we were, since it doesn't list that as a condition. It neither explicitly bans or permits gay marriage, nor polygamy, the latter is not an accident of course, regarding the former, at that time there was no question on the matter, as the debate was more focused on whether gays should be decriminalized or punished or subjected to therapy, marriage was really on the table when a big chunk of the countries were sending gays to prison for years.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Let's ban all Christian Marriage.
07/08/2010 06:36:13 AM
- 1530 Views
Nice satire, but it raises another point for me.
07/08/2010 07:20:49 AM
- 958 Views
That would only be appropriate if Christians wanted to ban secular unions of normal people.
07/08/2010 11:51:29 AM
- 1180 Views
Hey, look! There was a point over there!
07/08/2010 03:46:41 PM
- 992 Views
Who else should make those decisions?
07/08/2010 08:00:39 PM
- 940 Views
I'd totally...
08/08/2010 04:14:15 AM
- 905 Views
I'd totally...
08/08/2010 06:17:30 AM
- 1052 Views
I used to think Joel was the biggest rambler on this site. I am seriously reconsidering.
08/08/2010 05:24:56 AM
- 977 Views
And my assessment of one poster as the most content-poor, non-contributing slug is unchanged
08/08/2010 07:17:02 PM
- 891 Views
*Shakes Head*
08/08/2010 06:23:47 AM
- 860 Views
I highly doubt Cannoli is "scared" of homosexuals *NM*
08/08/2010 06:29:54 AM
- 503 Views
Perhaps not in the physical sense.
08/08/2010 06:35:53 AM
- 953 Views
Re: Perhaps not in the physical sense.
08/08/2010 06:46:56 AM
- 915 Views
Re: *Shakes Head*
08/08/2010 07:43:11 PM
- 906 Views
I still do not see how you think marriage is a "pointless" institution
08/08/2010 08:05:45 PM
- 1007 Views
No, I was referring to same-sex marriage. Real marriage hardly counts as a novelty. *NM*
11/08/2010 02:28:43 PM
- 416 Views
This must be the "thought out reaction" I've heard so much about.
08/08/2010 10:45:59 PM
- 851 Views
You cannot be that stupid.
11/08/2010 03:10:55 PM
- 1137 Views
There's a lot of ridiculous arguments here, but I'll focus on just one of them...
11/08/2010 03:38:05 PM
- 1014 Views
A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
08/08/2010 11:51:24 PM
- 881 Views
Plolygamy and incest are not on the same level of bad.
09/08/2010 11:00:07 AM
- 918 Views
Is that assumption valid?
09/08/2010 11:36:26 AM
- 871 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid?
09/08/2010 11:46:42 AM
- 854 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid?
09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM
- 965 Views
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives.
11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM
- 995 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
09/08/2010 11:25:39 AM
- 883 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
09/08/2010 11:51:50 AM
- 845 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
09/08/2010 01:18:35 PM
- 939 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too
09/08/2010 02:54:19 PM
- 959 Views
It should be noted again...
09/08/2010 08:59:32 PM
- 985 Views
and how is it not a right?
09/08/2010 09:19:12 PM
- 857 Views
My definition of rights...
09/08/2010 10:47:16 PM
- 985 Views
mmm, but the UN has legally stated marriage as a right.
10/08/2010 02:52:03 AM
- 750 Views
Article 16 probably not a great example
10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM
- 847 Views
You could just as easily move the emphasis...
10/08/2010 04:08:46 AM
- 972 Views
If we need a more specific resolution...
10/08/2010 04:22:12 AM
- 1157 Views
No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context
10/08/2010 05:25:57 AM
- 845 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context
10/08/2010 03:04:39 PM
- 1159 Views
That's really a ridiculous stance, you do realize.
10/08/2010 03:23:02 PM
- 811 Views
The point is that marriage IS a right, one which cannot be denied based upon sexual orientation *NM*
10/08/2010 07:04:16 PM
- 675 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context
10/08/2010 03:46:56 PM
- 1036 Views
It doesn't say a man can only marry a woman or vice versa, though.
10/08/2010 04:24:17 AM
- 845 Views
It also doesn't say they can
10/08/2010 04:41:18 AM
- 850 Views
I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point.
10/08/2010 06:09:32 PM
- 838 Views
Re: I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point.
10/08/2010 06:33:56 PM
- 772 Views
It's mentioned as a right in some SC decision quoted in that Walker opinion. *NM*
10/08/2010 06:51:13 PM
- 425 Views
To clarify for you
10/08/2010 05:36:14 AM
- 773 Views
The UNSC is actually the UN's enforcement body...
10/08/2010 07:16:31 PM
- 1218 Views
I'm not sure that I would call the Security Council the 'Enforcement Body'
10/08/2010 08:43:02 PM
- 820 Views
The fact that it is capable of authorizing the use of military force makes it an enforcement body
10/08/2010 10:33:59 PM
- 1082 Views
What the UN thinks is *completely* worthless....
10/08/2010 06:43:15 PM
- 782 Views
Why don't YOU back up your assertion that the right to marry exists? *NM*
11/08/2010 03:16:02 PM
- 473 Views
The actual ruling on Prop 8 specifices marriage as a freedom, not a right.
10/08/2010 12:02:17 AM
- 923 Views
Out of curiosity, what would you say to using the Ninth Amendment, possibly in conjunction...
10/08/2010 12:20:19 AM
- 1002 Views
Note it all you want...
10/08/2010 06:43:53 AM
- 721 Views
No, they seek to expand the terms of the partnership. Homosexuals can & do get married normally *NM*
11/08/2010 03:14:25 PM
- 479 Views
The best one yet.
10/08/2010 07:59:17 PM
- 969 Views
Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
10/08/2010 08:49:24 PM
- 846 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
10/08/2010 09:03:11 PM
- 953 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
11/08/2010 04:35:03 PM
- 833 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane
11/08/2010 04:41:23 PM
- 955 Views
Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel
11/08/2010 05:06:47 PM
- 930 Views
Re: Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel
11/08/2010 05:09:23 PM
- 919 Views