And not just for you. That said, I suspect the problem is more one of myopia than unions. Perhaps as simple as our old friend Mr. Alienation.
To a disturbing degree, many, most, Americans don't see themselves as part of a community anymore (after all, that's the root word in "communism" and we all know that's bad; all things collective are, as Ayn Rand wisely taught us. ) Hence the people gunning for your Senator are only looking at how this one vote stands to hurt them; the sacrifices that would otherwise be required of other groups aren't their concern. Of course, if the Legislature had simply decided to raise taxes enough that they didn't have to cut any services or jobs, they'd have a completely different demographic screaming for their heads for precisely the same reason.
They're not seeing all the positive things your Senator does that only affect them tangentially, or remembering all the times she was on their side, since that's ancient history now. Remember, in politics it's "what have you done for me lately?" Unions happen to be robust enough in WA, apparently, that they have the financial and political clout to single-handedly win elections, but I assure you that's not the case nationally. Last I checked (and that was the mid-nineties) national union membership was around 12% and falling due to the combined effects of shrinking US manufacturing, Taft-Hartley and applying RICO laws to unions as if they were AUTOMATICALLY organized crime. After all, the unions were enraged when Reagan fired striking air traffic controllers thirty years ago, but it didn't change anything (apart from the sudden spike in airplanes landing IN runways instead of ON them. )
So, yeah, this time, in this place, it happens to be the unions, but other times and other places it's completely different groups doing exactly the same things for the same reasons. It may be a little more frantic up there because, frankly, US unions are running scared and have been for some time. For a generation the decline of US manufacturing has routinely made them choose between cuts to pay and benefits or unemployment, and as prices rise there's a limit to how much wages can fall before mere survival becomes impossible. Go someplace else and it's ranchers bitching about property taxes, or businesses bitching about regulation, or environmentalists bitching about LACK of regulation, or inner city residents bitching about inadequate school funding. And not one of them gives a dead rats ass about the problems of any of the others.
That's our kinder gentler ownership society, m'friend, not so much "ownership" as "you're on your own. " Until we remember that nothing happens in a vacuum, that we hang together or hang separately, it's going to get a lot worse before it gets any better. "Union" in every sense is becoming an obsolete concept in America.
To a disturbing degree, many, most, Americans don't see themselves as part of a community anymore (after all, that's the root word in "communism" and we all know that's bad; all things collective are, as Ayn Rand wisely taught us. ) Hence the people gunning for your Senator are only looking at how this one vote stands to hurt them; the sacrifices that would otherwise be required of other groups aren't their concern. Of course, if the Legislature had simply decided to raise taxes enough that they didn't have to cut any services or jobs, they'd have a completely different demographic screaming for their heads for precisely the same reason.
They're not seeing all the positive things your Senator does that only affect them tangentially, or remembering all the times she was on their side, since that's ancient history now. Remember, in politics it's "what have you done for me lately?" Unions happen to be robust enough in WA, apparently, that they have the financial and political clout to single-handedly win elections, but I assure you that's not the case nationally. Last I checked (and that was the mid-nineties) national union membership was around 12% and falling due to the combined effects of shrinking US manufacturing, Taft-Hartley and applying RICO laws to unions as if they were AUTOMATICALLY organized crime. After all, the unions were enraged when Reagan fired striking air traffic controllers thirty years ago, but it didn't change anything (apart from the sudden spike in airplanes landing IN runways instead of ON them. )
So, yeah, this time, in this place, it happens to be the unions, but other times and other places it's completely different groups doing exactly the same things for the same reasons. It may be a little more frantic up there because, frankly, US unions are running scared and have been for some time. For a generation the decline of US manufacturing has routinely made them choose between cuts to pay and benefits or unemployment, and as prices rise there's a limit to how much wages can fall before mere survival becomes impossible. Go someplace else and it's ranchers bitching about property taxes, or businesses bitching about regulation, or environmentalists bitching about LACK of regulation, or inner city residents bitching about inadequate school funding. And not one of them gives a dead rats ass about the problems of any of the others.
That's our kinder gentler ownership society, m'friend, not so much "ownership" as "you're on your own. " Until we remember that nothing happens in a vacuum, that we hang together or hang separately, it's going to get a lot worse before it gets any better. "Union" in every sense is becoming an obsolete concept in America.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Politics and the unions
01/08/2010 12:17:01 PM
- 911 Views
Yet another fine example of how unions are detrimental to the nation. *NM*
01/08/2010 02:14:54 PM
- 225 Views
Also of how the election system is dreadful, though. *NM*
01/08/2010 03:41:32 PM
- 203 Views
I agree with both of you.
01/08/2010 06:30:22 PM
- 546 Views
To paraphrase Winston Churchill...
01/08/2010 06:52:39 PM
- 564 Views
The man was a genius.
01/08/2010 06:56:54 PM
- 531 Views
The man was a ^%^%*^%#$$#$#**! ^%$#%$! $$#$#! ^%^%! ^%(*! &&&(&**&!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
02/08/2010 06:40:32 AM
- 601 Views
No, he was. Classic case of good speech-making covering up decades of blunders & douchey policy *NM*
02/08/2010 10:34:33 PM
- 281 Views
You get in bed with cats (unions), you wake up with fleas. *NM*
01/08/2010 05:03:58 PM
- 236 Views
They're impossible to avoid here.
01/08/2010 06:35:37 PM
- 569 Views
Don't try to sully dogs with your so-called facts. The phrase works better with cats.
01/08/2010 06:50:13 PM
- 565 Views
That truly sucks, man, sorry.
02/08/2010 05:32:03 AM
- 632 Views
Thanks...
03/08/2010 05:02:19 AM
- 646 Views
You're welcome; expect an edit when I'm not too tired to be coherent.
03/08/2010 11:23:57 PM
- 489 Views
civil service unions are the worst
02/08/2010 05:58:13 PM
- 592 Views
hey now. northern california isn't that flaky
02/08/2010 09:36:57 PM
- 463 Views
I always considered the bay port of northern califonria
02/08/2010 10:19:17 PM
- 519 Views
well i only actually know my family up there
02/08/2010 10:39:24 PM
- 513 Views
I have extended family in Alturas and Grass Valley. It's beautiful up there.
05/08/2010 03:00:17 PM
- 518 Views