Active Users:382 Time:26/11/2024 05:35:20 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
"loony left"? BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 17/07/2010 11:40:41 PM
From the loony left post you make I would assume you have never been bit by one.

Never been called that. Tbh it's sort of refreshing in a way. But perhaps you have me confused with someone else? Or were you really only talking about that one post?

Anyway back to the point. Yes, news sources can be pro-British, pro-American, etc. in a free press. They can also challenge the statements made by government officials. That's the whole point of a free press.

I didn't say BBC, or any other organization, was unbiased. I was just saying what I had a preference for, and it wasn't a source that echoes back what the govt. puts out
Reply to message
BBC News Sells it's Soul - If it ever had one... Wibble - 15/07/2010 09:50:52 PM 1059 Views
umm ok *NM* Aisha - 15/07/2010 10:03:37 PM 275 Views
wow that's low... *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 10:18:28 PM 243 Views
That doesn't... seem that weird? nossy - 15/07/2010 10:40:58 PM 615 Views
Looks like they're trying their best to uphold journalistic integrity in the face of public opinion lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:54:00 PM 699 Views
In fact, having now read the link a bit better... I think this is good journalism. I applaud it. lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:57:35 PM 720 Views
thats what i took away form that article Aisha - 15/07/2010 11:13:02 PM 605 Views
I suspect it is the line of thought that says giving terrorists airtime is justifying their actions. *NM* Ghavrel - 15/07/2010 11:32:37 PM 240 Views
That's what I disliked about it, yes *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 11:42:53 PM 252 Views
i wonder if the same logic applies to giving air time to white supremacist Aisha - 16/07/2010 02:37:43 AM 552 Views
I don't like that line of thought. Nate - 16/07/2010 02:44:41 AM 726 Views
I was going to say this*: nossy - 16/07/2010 02:47:37 AM 591 Views
The amount of newsworthy information in that article was close to zero, though ironclad - 16/07/2010 10:16:56 AM 558 Views
Perhaps you read a different article then? snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:19:04 AM 552 Views
I agree snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:16:25 AM 528 Views
its, not it's. i thought you were talking about the site format, which now sucks. temeraire - 16/07/2010 06:36:23 AM 575 Views
Sorry I just don't see what is upsetting you with this article random thoughts - 16/07/2010 03:12:24 PM 605 Views
You just agreed with snoopcester about something. nossy - 16/07/2010 08:07:15 PM 535 Views
well hell really hasn't frozen over yet random thoughts - 16/07/2010 11:14:31 PM 710 Views
I'd rather have an unbiased source of information BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 12:19:39 AM 631 Views
Ditto snoopcester - 17/07/2010 12:28:39 AM 534 Views
that is funny coming from the guy who reads the Guardian random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:12:05 PM 491 Views
I'd guess I actually spend more time reading the Daily Telegraph snoopcester - 17/07/2010 04:15:43 PM 495 Views
Whoa nossy - 17/07/2010 08:59:35 PM 653 Views
Not at me, surely. I'm adorable. *NM* Ghavrel - 17/07/2010 10:07:15 PM 251 Views
Pft, evil most often hides behind "adorable." *NM* nossy - 17/07/2010 10:34:22 PM 218 Views
you wouldn't know an unbiased source if it bit you random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:09:46 PM 522 Views
"loony left"? BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 11:40:41 PM 563 Views
Sorry man. everynametaken - 16/07/2010 11:54:38 PM 510 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes