I've never been in favor of divorce, and I have not now nor have ever stated that I support so-called frivolous marriages. In fact, I've come out her against both divorce and allowing just anyone anytime to be married, because I do not (and no one else does) view it as a RIGHT, but a privilege. But that's beside the point. Marriage is not a right, regardless of my views of it.
It is a right, regardless of your views on it. The government cannot tell two heteros that they cannot marry, unless there is some legal reason. And as it is the purpose of a modern, civil government to ensure that subsets of its people are not being forbidden things unjustly, the laws will eventually change. *shrug*
If you're talking about Catholic marriage, then yes, you are correct that it is not a right. But I have news for you-- infidels are getting married left and right, dear. You're losing the high ground on which ones you can forbid which things (legally speaking).
It changes the traditional definition of marriage, which is between a man and a woman. So how is marriage not being changed?
Changes the religious definition of marriage, which is not the same thing as what the legal definition will shape up to be. But again, we won't agree, so we really don't need to keep harping on it.
And you can talk all you like about not being "rude" but your passive aggressive language betrays your true intent.
Kiddo, it's not passive aggressive at all to tell someone that while you don't intend to be rude, you will be honest about your true feelings. I told you exactly what I think, and I'm sorry if that puts you in an uncomfortable position with me. I wasn't going to lie, however.
Argentina legalizes gay marriage
15/07/2010 03:44:34 PM
- 1108 Views
I'm glad - was getting depressed hearing about Uganda on NPR yesterday.
15/07/2010 03:56:33 PM
- 740 Views
How unfortunate.
15/07/2010 07:58:29 PM
- 751 Views
Well...
15/07/2010 09:41:32 PM
- 744 Views
Looks like the USA is falling behind on human rights again. Hopefully it will spur further change. *NM*
15/07/2010 10:48:43 PM
- 462 Views
"Again?" We were doing pretty well circa 1776, but since then maybe not so much. *NM*
15/07/2010 11:33:49 PM
- 331 Views
Marriage is not now, nor has it ever been a "right". *NM*
16/07/2010 12:41:21 AM
- 288 Views
you just really want someone to get into this with you, don't you?
16/07/2010 01:14:16 AM
- 737 Views
Well it's true.
16/07/2010 05:15:02 AM
- 700 Views
I realize it would be polite of me to answer that
16/07/2010 02:50:30 PM
- 663 Views
Re: I realize it would be polite of me to answer that
16/07/2010 03:50:41 PM
- 713 Views
You might want to look up passive-aggressive.
16/07/2010 05:32:07 PM
- 793 Views
You mean you don't have a right to get married? *NM*
16/07/2010 02:50:46 PM
- 294 Views
No you don't. In fact...
16/07/2010 03:52:29 PM
- 720 Views
WRONG!!!
16/07/2010 11:16:58 PM
- 727 Views
Nothing about homosexuals having the "right" to marry and have a family.
16/07/2010 11:20:03 PM
- 719 Views
Pepsi isn't a right
16/07/2010 03:04:30 PM
- 735 Views
And yet no country can force any church/mosque to marry anyone who is gay.
16/07/2010 03:53:42 PM
- 753 Views
That isn't relevant
16/07/2010 04:17:32 PM
- 821 Views
And yet the burden is on you to prove marriage is a right.
16/07/2010 04:59:03 PM
- 712 Views
you keep claiming that. Shouldn't you be able to prove you are right first?
16/07/2010 05:29:43 PM
- 696 Views
Have you been drinking?
16/07/2010 11:18:43 PM
- 697 Views
it doesn't have to mention them specifically, they have been granted ALL the rights/freedoms listed
16/07/2010 11:36:47 PM
- 676 Views
Are you on drugs or just stupid? 'Marriage is not now, nor has it ever been a "right".'
17/07/2010 12:09:23 AM
- 694 Views
you don't have to get married in a church/mosque/whatever or under any official thereof.
16/07/2010 04:55:34 PM
- 758 Views
It. Is. Still. Not. A. Right. *NM*
16/07/2010 04:59:34 PM
- 315 Views
*Shrug* I view it as one. No amount of denial can change that. *NM*
16/07/2010 05:40:32 PM
- 340 Views