Active Users:436 Time:19/04/2025 12:16:38 AM
I agree snoopcester Send a noteboard - 16/07/2010 11:16:25 AM
I'm not 100% comfortable with giving them air time but if the BBC ignored a chance to show the other side of it when it was available 1st hand then it is really acting as a propaganda arm of the UK government instead of as an independent body.

The article linked does clearly show both sides of it - the journalist states he questioned the claims that civilian deaths were also caused by the Taliban and what the response to that was. Then there the comment on it by Ministry of Defence as well, so clearly they've set out to give a proper context to the interview and it goes with the reporting of the journalist's question to undermine the terrorist's claims.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
BBC News Sells it's Soul - If it ever had one... - 15/07/2010 09:50:52 PM 1103 Views
umm ok *NM* - 15/07/2010 10:03:37 PM 299 Views
wow that's low... *NM* - 15/07/2010 10:18:28 PM 267 Views
That doesn't... seem that weird? - 15/07/2010 10:40:58 PM 689 Views
Looks like they're trying their best to uphold journalistic integrity in the face of public opinion - 15/07/2010 10:54:00 PM 768 Views
In fact, having now read the link a bit better... I think this is good journalism. I applaud it. - 15/07/2010 10:57:35 PM 762 Views
thats what i took away form that article - 15/07/2010 11:13:02 PM 677 Views
I suspect it is the line of thought that says giving terrorists airtime is justifying their actions. *NM* - 15/07/2010 11:32:37 PM 264 Views
That's what I disliked about it, yes *NM* - 15/07/2010 11:42:53 PM 279 Views
I don't like that line of thought. - 16/07/2010 02:44:41 AM 790 Views
I was going to say this*: - 16/07/2010 02:47:37 AM 665 Views
The amount of newsworthy information in that article was close to zero, though - 16/07/2010 10:16:56 AM 633 Views
Perhaps you read a different article then? - 16/07/2010 11:19:04 AM 626 Views
I agree - 16/07/2010 11:16:25 AM 605 Views
Sorry I just don't see what is upsetting you with this article - 16/07/2010 03:12:24 PM 675 Views
You just agreed with snoopcester about something. - 16/07/2010 08:07:15 PM 600 Views
well hell really hasn't frozen over yet - 16/07/2010 11:14:31 PM 782 Views
I'd rather have an unbiased source of information - 17/07/2010 12:19:39 AM 700 Views
Ditto - 17/07/2010 12:28:39 AM 602 Views
that is funny coming from the guy who reads the Guardian - 17/07/2010 03:12:05 PM 561 Views
I'd guess I actually spend more time reading the Daily Telegraph - 17/07/2010 04:15:43 PM 572 Views
Whoa - 17/07/2010 08:59:35 PM 735 Views
Not at me, surely. I'm adorable. *NM* - 17/07/2010 10:07:15 PM 281 Views
Pft, evil most often hides behind "adorable." *NM* - 17/07/2010 10:34:22 PM 246 Views
you wouldn't know an unbiased source if it bit you - 17/07/2010 03:09:46 PM 591 Views
"loony left"? - 17/07/2010 11:40:41 PM 636 Views
Sorry man. - 16/07/2010 11:54:38 PM 576 Views

Reply to Message