Active Users:411 Time:17/04/2025 01:26:41 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
In fact, having now read the link a bit better... I think this is good journalism. I applaud it. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 10:57:35 PM
Also, read it again: they are very careful to couch their report in a constant reminder that this is just what the guys claims. They start AND finish the article with statements that are clearly not in support of this guy and his claims. They're reporting pure fact, as they have it - this guy said that, this guy claimed that - and letting the readers decide the validity of this guy's claims themselves. That is the very definition of good journalism.

Honestly, I don't know what your reasoning is Wibble.
This message last edited by lord-of-shadow on 15/07/2010 at 11:02:40 PM
Reply to message
BBC News Sells it's Soul - If it ever had one... Wibble - 15/07/2010 09:50:52 PM 1101 Views
umm ok *NM* Aisha - 15/07/2010 10:03:37 PM 298 Views
wow that's low... *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 10:18:28 PM 267 Views
That doesn't... seem that weird? nossy - 15/07/2010 10:40:58 PM 686 Views
Looks like they're trying their best to uphold journalistic integrity in the face of public opinion lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:54:00 PM 768 Views
In fact, having now read the link a bit better... I think this is good journalism. I applaud it. lord-of-shadow - 15/07/2010 10:57:35 PM 761 Views
thats what i took away form that article Aisha - 15/07/2010 11:13:02 PM 676 Views
I suspect it is the line of thought that says giving terrorists airtime is justifying their actions. *NM* Ghavrel - 15/07/2010 11:32:37 PM 264 Views
That's what I disliked about it, yes *NM* ironclad - 15/07/2010 11:42:53 PM 279 Views
i wonder if the same logic applies to giving air time to white supremacist Aisha - 16/07/2010 02:37:43 AM 620 Views
I don't like that line of thought. Nate - 16/07/2010 02:44:41 AM 788 Views
I was going to say this*: nossy - 16/07/2010 02:47:37 AM 663 Views
The amount of newsworthy information in that article was close to zero, though ironclad - 16/07/2010 10:16:56 AM 631 Views
Perhaps you read a different article then? snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:19:04 AM 624 Views
I agree snoopcester - 16/07/2010 11:16:25 AM 604 Views
its, not it's. i thought you were talking about the site format, which now sucks. temeraire - 16/07/2010 06:36:23 AM 638 Views
Sorry I just don't see what is upsetting you with this article random thoughts - 16/07/2010 03:12:24 PM 674 Views
You just agreed with snoopcester about something. nossy - 16/07/2010 08:07:15 PM 598 Views
well hell really hasn't frozen over yet random thoughts - 16/07/2010 11:14:31 PM 781 Views
I'd rather have an unbiased source of information BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 12:19:39 AM 699 Views
Ditto snoopcester - 17/07/2010 12:28:39 AM 600 Views
that is funny coming from the guy who reads the Guardian random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:12:05 PM 559 Views
I'd guess I actually spend more time reading the Daily Telegraph snoopcester - 17/07/2010 04:15:43 PM 571 Views
Whoa nossy - 17/07/2010 08:59:35 PM 733 Views
Not at me, surely. I'm adorable. *NM* Ghavrel - 17/07/2010 10:07:15 PM 280 Views
Pft, evil most often hides behind "adorable." *NM* nossy - 17/07/2010 10:34:22 PM 246 Views
you wouldn't know an unbiased source if it bit you random thoughts - 17/07/2010 03:09:46 PM 591 Views
"loony left"? BlackAdder - 17/07/2010 11:40:41 PM 635 Views
Sorry man. everynametaken - 16/07/2010 11:54:38 PM 575 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes