Active Users:1105 Time:22/11/2024 09:14:47 AM
Viable alternatives Werthead Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 01:16:39 AM
Rather than just question the viability of the premium account idea without offering alternatives, I've taken a look at how other boards handles the same issues without resorting to some sort of multi-tiered poster structure.

The first thing they do is employ Amazon and Google Ads, and make big drives to get people to order books through those ads (they get a cut of them) rather than just going to the sites direct. You have a lot of people reviewing books on this site, it should be relatively straightforward to set up a link on those reviews to the respective Amazon pages, and if people like the sound of the book they can order it that way and RAFO gets a cut of the cash. Since RAFO has provided a service in making them aware of the book, that works out. Obviously, you can also encourage the WHEEL OF TIME fanbase to order TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT via an Amazon link on the site as well.

Secondly, is the good old-fashioned pledge drive, maybe mixed in with competitions and raffles. Whenever other sites' hosting fees are coming up and they haven't made enough money via advertising, they simply say, "We need £xxx, we've provided you with countless hours of entertainment/job-endangering time-wasting, help us out," and put up a PayPal account. When they reach the amount needed, they take it down, say thanks, and sometimes throw in prizes or some sort of raffle arrangement so those who contribute get a chance of winning some books or other gear.

Thirdly, sponsorship. This is harder to get, but as an SFF-related website with several thousand members, it's possible that at least one or two publishers might consider some sort of deal in return for advertising their books on the site in a relatively non-obtrusive way. £6 a month to get their names in front of a couple of thousand book-buyers isn't a lot to a company like Tor or Orbit, especially considering the site's long association (through its direct ancestor, Wotmania, which I would recommend playing up, as Wotmania was very well-regarded by some publishers) with the WHEEL OF TIME web presence.

Just some ideas. Other sites use them to pay for much higher web hosting fees than RAFO has, so they do work.
This message last edited by Werthead on 15/07/2010 at 01:18:14 AM
Reply to message
EDIT: Remember folks, today's the last day of the free premium accounts! - 06/07/2010 08:52:02 PM 3197 Views
Awesome job, mate! - 06/07/2010 09:03:20 PM 1253 Views
I see that you've also fixed the spelling of "received" in the noteboards. - 06/07/2010 09:08:00 PM 1289 Views
Erm... can you recheck your settings? - 06/07/2010 09:20:50 PM 1239 Views
They've not changed. *NM* - 06/07/2010 09:22:07 PM 696 Views
Default quote setting is excellent - 06/07/2010 10:02:35 PM 1297 Views
Nice! - 06/07/2010 11:51:09 PM 1079 Views
Yay! - 07/07/2010 04:32:39 PM 1121 Views
Time zone - 07/07/2010 05:23:43 PM 1092 Views
Yeah, Us/Eastern is ahead an hour too. - 07/07/2010 05:44:40 PM 1288 Views
Cool, I must locate some money to get one. *NM* - 08/07/2010 03:48:59 PM 741 Views
I all of a sudden miss Wse - 10/07/2010 01:28:00 AM 1173 Views
In a way, yes *NM* - 16/07/2010 06:43:14 AM 616 Views
Just how much bandwidth is Read and Find out using per month? - 11/07/2010 05:50:02 AM 1241 Views
So, you think Ben should pay it out of his own pocket then? - 12/07/2010 09:33:27 AM 1388 Views
Oh Jing. - 12/07/2010 08:05:31 PM 1278 Views
It's a very reasonable question. - 12/07/2010 09:29:26 PM 1372 Views
Good point *NM* - 12/07/2010 09:38:25 PM 626 Views
You want to charge people for functionality every other forum on the web gives them for free? - 14/07/2010 08:47:32 PM 1441 Views
It is exactly the same stuff Mike asked money for - 14/07/2010 09:00:55 PM 1108 Views
Why can't people even ask the question(s)? - 14/07/2010 09:22:11 PM 1250 Views
Re: Why can't people even ask the question(s)? - 14/07/2010 09:36:54 PM 1304 Views
Well - 14/07/2010 09:57:09 PM 1427 Views
Exactly. - 15/07/2010 12:09:14 AM 1204 Views
The messageboards are perfectly functional without a premium account. - 14/07/2010 09:17:43 PM 1089 Views
I see it as a way of giving people something back for donations. - 14/07/2010 10:09:08 PM 1360 Views
He does have a point when it comes to hyperlinks. - 15/07/2010 06:52:41 PM 1080 Views
There are other reasons why I don't want links in posts - 15/07/2010 08:18:53 PM 1112 Views
Why is that? - 15/07/2010 09:14:52 PM 1272 Views
Viable alternatives - 15/07/2010 01:16:39 AM 1304 Views
I have to agree with you here - 16/07/2010 06:55:43 AM 1082 Views
Advertising makes a site look like shit. - 16/07/2010 08:28:00 AM 1023 Views
Only if you choose to let it. - 16/07/2010 12:17:47 PM 1322 Views
This is just the BBforum argument rehashed. - 16/07/2010 06:07:20 PM 1195 Views
But those are the very things being introduced by the premium accounts. - 17/07/2010 12:44:05 PM 1309 Views
Re: One Thing - 17/07/2010 04:24:51 PM 1188 Views
Agreed. - 17/07/2010 04:34:09 PM 1145 Views
RAFO is a lot of great things, but great-looking it is not. - 16/07/2010 02:28:50 PM 1221 Views
As I've said above... - 16/07/2010 01:49:37 PM 1281 Views
Just to be clear: - 16/07/2010 03:18:22 PM 1220 Views
Re: As I've said above... - 16/07/2010 05:58:39 PM 1233 Views
Premium Plus account does. - 16/07/2010 06:05:07 PM 1280 Views
Re: Premium Plus account does. - 16/07/2010 06:13:17 PM 1071 Views
Re: Premium Plus account does. - 16/07/2010 09:03:27 PM 1088 Views
And - 17/07/2010 04:37:12 PM 1163 Views
To be honest, that misses part of the appeal for some of us - 17/07/2010 12:17:15 AM 1165 Views
It's a start - 16/07/2010 06:37:44 PM 1187 Views
Yeah, that's the other thing. - 16/07/2010 08:59:51 PM 1185 Views
Go Ben! \o/ *NM* - 18/07/2010 02:52:30 AM 524 Views
That's the root of the problem. - 21/07/2010 01:10:56 PM 1353 Views
Question - 18/07/2010 12:02:02 PM 1369 Views
I think it's reasonable - 17/07/2010 12:33:56 AM 1400 Views
I like it, and thanks =) - 23/07/2010 12:43:11 PM 1094 Views
I don't really have a problem paying - I just dislike Paypal. - 03/08/2010 05:53:14 PM 1491 Views

Reply to Message