Active Users:1048 Time:14/11/2024 06:00:12 AM
Yeah, Pedro shooting meant it was a new situation where Villa was onside Floffe Send a noteboard - 03/07/2010 11:56:30 PM
Which is, Villa is clearly offside at the moment Iniesta passes to Pedro. Pedro then hits the post, Villa does his post-post-net thing in the rebound. Is there some kind of resetting point at which time Villa's previous offside suddenly didn't matter anymore and so he was allowed to score on the rebound? Maybe the hitting the post part?

If Pedro had passed it to Villa there wouldn't have been an offside either. Resetting point: new player on the attacking team plays the ball (pass, shoot, head etc)
--- signature starts here ---

I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!

e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Reply to message
Well, I am glad it was Spain who got through. - 03/07/2010 10:24:01 PM 557 Views
I have a question about that goal, none of our commentators mentioned it... - 03/07/2010 10:32:44 PM 405 Views
As far as I remember it.... - 03/07/2010 10:59:22 PM 316 Views
Hm, okay. - 03/07/2010 11:58:51 PM 325 Views
Re: Hm, okay. - 04/07/2010 12:43:59 AM 334 Views
Right. Offsides is determined at the time a ball is kicked. - 04/07/2010 04:52:22 AM 301 Views
Yeah, Pedro shooting meant it was a new situation where Villa was onside - 03/07/2010 11:56:30 PM 334 Views
Was their soccer really this bad (article inside) - 04/07/2010 07:53:30 AM 452 Views
That's a bit of an exaggeration for comic effect, I'd say. - 04/07/2010 09:51:25 AM 411 Views
I thought the ball was jinxed - 04/07/2010 09:57:03 AM 454 Views
Yes - 04/07/2010 12:04:03 PM 387 Views
I would have liked them to be forced to go over 120 minutes - 04/07/2010 11:07:23 AM 354 Views
Interesting game. - 05/07/2010 10:17:46 AM 315 Views

Reply to Message