You'd think the small government people would be counting this one as a loss, or at least the folks who stress state and local rights. Apparently we're all about the National Government trumping the local if we agree with the ruling?
Still, it always makes me curious. Does the right to bear arms automatically apply to all forms of armaments? Like, if I could build a nuke, would I be permitted to? Probably not, but wouldn't it be covered under the broader readings of the amendment? I'm being intentionally hyperbolic with that example.
Oh well. The main discussion was apparently over whether National Law trumps State or Local and the short sightedness of the Libs on the court didn't get in their own way for once. It's depressing to know that if the debate of National Authority over state and local authority had been clothed in the issue of abortion rights, the vote would probably have gone the other way along the same political lines.
Still, it always makes me curious. Does the right to bear arms automatically apply to all forms of armaments? Like, if I could build a nuke, would I be permitted to? Probably not, but wouldn't it be covered under the broader readings of the amendment? I'm being intentionally hyperbolic with that example.
Oh well. The main discussion was apparently over whether National Law trumps State or Local and the short sightedness of the Libs on the court didn't get in their own way for once. It's depressing to know that if the debate of National Authority over state and local authority had been clothed in the issue of abortion rights, the vote would probably have gone the other way along the same political lines.
Eschew Verbosity
SCOTUS - Affirms Gun Rights Nationwide.....
28/06/2010 04:47:03 PM
- 455 Views
A good day for liberty.
28/06/2010 04:55:01 PM
- 171 Views
Great point - whether you agreed with the 2nd amendment or not, its intent is clear.....
28/06/2010 06:19:08 PM
- 152 Views
"well regulated militia" *NM*
28/06/2010 11:56:54 PM
- 43 Views
Read the dissents, they don't focus on "well regulated militia".....
29/06/2010 04:28:06 AM
- 136 Views
Um, no.
29/06/2010 06:05:37 AM
- 147 Views
Uh, yes......read the dissents entirely - it's about the 14th amendment. *NM*
29/06/2010 04:07:47 PM
- 44 Views
As the direct quote I provided proves, it was not only based on the 14th. *NM*
30/06/2010 01:09:22 AM
- 42 Views
Good, but I am surprised at how many people I've heard today saying stupid things like...
29/06/2010 03:18:29 AM
- 160 Views
Probably the right ruling.
29/06/2010 08:30:02 PM
- 141 Views
~sighs~
30/06/2010 02:23:21 AM
- 128 Views
Let's be serious, plenty of supposed constitutional rights nowadays were not intended that way.
30/06/2010 11:31:01 AM
- 134 Views