Your health is very much in danger.
Snarky comment aside, I think you're under a bit of delusion if you think cities are going to just magically build bike paths (it'll be SAFER!!), particularly since bike paths really don't make things much safer (They're right where a bike should be riding ANYWAYS).
If you can't ride on the road, don't. I totally agree that a cyclist IS safer off the road (although the pedestrians they're riding with aren't!), but there are significant problems with riding on the sidewalk as well. I can't tell you how many times I've honked my horn as I approached a pedestrian walking or jogging, and shocked the hell out of them as I politely went on the grass to go around them...because they had their iPods in their ears blaring and couldn't hear me. A few months ago, I was riding home from classes in the dark and I almost hit someone because my town isn't well lit, and they were a black person in dark clothing. On the Road, we're too slow. On the sidewalk, we're too fast.
What would you have a cyclist do, particularly in towns where they are not allowed to ride on the sidewalk? Simply not ride their bikes anywhere at all? How will that encourage legislatures to fund improved infrastructure?
Bike lanes would be nice, but that is not the reality that people have to work with most of the time. And even with bike lanes, cars would still need to pay attention and respect the biker's space, which remains as a central issue to cyclists in general.
So pretty much, with your opinions of cycling, the only GOOD option is to simply not cycle at all and either walk (Extending your travel time by at least double, making it implausible for people living over a certain distance from their destinations), or pay for a car/bus. Oh, and I'd like to also point out, that there are many small towns and cities that don't have public transport. I know my college town doesn't.
So what would you have them do?
Addendum: I just would like to say, a lot of my opinion on whether drivers will be aware is actually based on my experiences riding a moped on the street. DESPITE the fact that I was a motorized vehicle going the speed limit (in our town, most of the streets are only 30 mph), if not over, I was continuously treated like I did not belong on the road and had to save myself from accidents frequently due to driver's being unaware. I have a strong feeling that any motorbiker you talked to would mention some of the same problems that cyclists do. I don't disagree with some of your points, but infrastructure would not affect the problems. Despite problems elsewhere, the central issue is the drivers.
Snarky comment aside, I think you're under a bit of delusion if you think cities are going to just magically build bike paths (it'll be SAFER!!), particularly since bike paths really don't make things much safer (They're right where a bike should be riding ANYWAYS).
If you can't ride on the road, don't. I totally agree that a cyclist IS safer off the road (although the pedestrians they're riding with aren't!), but there are significant problems with riding on the sidewalk as well. I can't tell you how many times I've honked my horn as I approached a pedestrian walking or jogging, and shocked the hell out of them as I politely went on the grass to go around them...because they had their iPods in their ears blaring and couldn't hear me. A few months ago, I was riding home from classes in the dark and I almost hit someone because my town isn't well lit, and they were a black person in dark clothing. On the Road, we're too slow. On the sidewalk, we're too fast.
What would you have a cyclist do, particularly in towns where they are not allowed to ride on the sidewalk? Simply not ride their bikes anywhere at all? How will that encourage legislatures to fund improved infrastructure?
Bike lanes would be nice, but that is not the reality that people have to work with most of the time. And even with bike lanes, cars would still need to pay attention and respect the biker's space, which remains as a central issue to cyclists in general.
So pretty much, with your opinions of cycling, the only GOOD option is to simply not cycle at all and either walk (Extending your travel time by at least double, making it implausible for people living over a certain distance from their destinations), or pay for a car/bus. Oh, and I'd like to also point out, that there are many small towns and cities that don't have public transport. I know my college town doesn't.
So what would you have them do?
Addendum: I just would like to say, a lot of my opinion on whether drivers will be aware is actually based on my experiences riding a moped on the street. DESPITE the fact that I was a motorized vehicle going the speed limit (in our town, most of the streets are only 30 mph), if not over, I was continuously treated like I did not belong on the road and had to save myself from accidents frequently due to driver's being unaware. I have a strong feeling that any motorbiker you talked to would mention some of the same problems that cyclists do. I don't disagree with some of your points, but infrastructure would not affect the problems. Despite problems elsewhere, the central issue is the drivers.
Which, unsurprisingly, is also what makes for most jerks; being in a car just isolates jerks from the consequences of the behavior it thus encourages. It's hard to retaliate against someone encased in metal, and he knows it. On the other hand, I still remember walking home the five blocks from school, in the pouring rain, and being literally ridden down by a classmate crusing home on a bike. He probably didn't see me in the rain, but that's not really the point: We were in a residential neighborhood and if he was going to ride he should've been doing so in the 30 mph street rather than on the sidewalk where it was illegal. I'm sorry, if you can't get within at least ten miles per hour of the speed limit on a fairly consistent basis, get the hell off the road, and I don't mean "operate your vehicle on the shoulder where it's illegal to operate a vehicle for extended periods. " We DO need more bike lanes; we also need laws that say if there isn't a bike lane it's not legal to operate a bike there. I'm tired of seeing bicyclists riding next to each other on the shoulders of 60+ mph highways and then blaming drivers when one of them is killed. And, yes, I think a 200 pound human on a 50 lb. bike is as much of a hazard to a car as a small deer.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
I got screamed at by a motorist while riding my bicycle today
28/06/2010 05:44:45 AM
- 1665 Views
Ummm
28/06/2010 06:01:19 AM
- 1280 Views
Let me guess. You live in an American suburb. *NM*
28/06/2010 06:12:24 AM
- 547 Views
Yeah, the "sport" part gives that away even more than everything else... *NM*
28/06/2010 08:06:03 AM
- 560 Views
seriously, you think people didn't use bikes as transportation anymore!! *NM*
28/06/2010 08:26:36 AM
- 643 Views
That was offensive to cyclists. People who think like you are why so many of us die. *NM*
28/06/2010 08:28:24 AM
- 623 Views
Now that I've calmed down a bit, I'm going to actually address your points.
28/06/2010 12:16:10 PM
- 1403 Views
hey now!
28/06/2010 01:18:16 PM
- 936 Views
I understand that what he said offended you
28/06/2010 04:11:57 PM
- 1165 Views
You're right, I was stereotyping and getting a little ad hominem. I'm sorry. *NM*
29/06/2010 08:33:20 AM
- 601 Views
My social capital at this site is pretty low, so I don't mind admitting that I agree with MK.
28/06/2010 04:12:42 PM
- 1037 Views
Re: My social capital at this site is pretty low, so I don't mind admitting that I agree with MK.
28/06/2010 06:27:42 PM
- 1081 Views
This point:
28/06/2010 06:37:32 PM
- 1141 Views
Not in the United States.
28/06/2010 07:25:56 PM
- 1133 Views
Highways are, of course, a different matter.
28/06/2010 07:32:50 PM
- 1091 Views
I know
28/06/2010 07:34:04 PM
- 1200 Views
Re: I know
28/06/2010 08:27:04 PM
- 1053 Views
Re: I know
28/06/2010 08:38:14 PM
- 1180 Views
It is illegal to drive on the shoulder.
29/06/2010 09:43:40 AM
- 1172 Views
i'm pretty sure bicycles are banned from almost all highways, regardless of access
29/06/2010 02:34:00 PM
- 959 Views
Maybe I should have said "modern roads."
28/06/2010 08:20:55 PM
- 1144 Views
Perhaps.
28/06/2010 08:36:15 PM
- 1195 Views
I think we just disagree on the necessity is all.
28/06/2010 09:00:44 PM
- 967 Views
Yes, because that cyclist is SUCH a hazard to you in your car.
29/06/2010 01:03:05 AM
- 1121 Views
The central issue is people.
29/06/2010 09:52:22 AM
- 1099 Views
you keep talking about cyclists on highways as if it applied to all roads.
29/06/2010 02:37:31 PM
- 1157 Views
There are TWO equally important points there:
30/06/2010 01:15:17 AM
- 1159 Views
then why are you arguing with me? I said that the central issue is people being stupid. *NM*
01/07/2010 05:59:23 AM
- 568 Views
Two words: Public Transportation
30/06/2010 03:32:05 AM
- 1128 Views
...doesn't exist or is completely dysfunctional in a lot of places. *NM*
30/06/2010 03:57:26 AM
- 585 Views
Re: Two words: Public Transportation
30/06/2010 08:43:51 AM
- 1306 Views
Re: Two words: Public Transportation
01/07/2010 08:05:37 AM
- 1135 Views
You can't be serious. If you do think that's always (not just sometimes) a viable option, then...
30/06/2010 09:20:03 AM
- 1080 Views
My city doesn't have ANY. not even shuttle buses. *NM*
01/07/2010 06:00:22 AM
- 629 Views
Re: My city doesn't have ANY. not even shuttle buses.
01/07/2010 08:08:02 AM
- 1105 Views
Outside of a highly urbanized area, I surmise. The entirety of the US is not like the East Coast. *NM*
02/07/2010 02:11:01 AM
- 623 Views
Despite your subject line, I'm glad to see that we agree with each other more than MK and I do.
29/06/2010 10:13:29 AM
- 1188 Views
Get your head on straight, you silly cyclist
01/07/2010 08:02:58 AM
- 984 Views
He never said there were no buses in our city. He said that, as a student, he can't afford them. *NM*
01/07/2010 08:42:47 AM
- 580 Views
I'd say most urban areas have few roads with speed limits above 50 km/h (30mph)
01/07/2010 10:35:20 AM
- 1033 Views
Now now, there's no need to be rude.
02/07/2010 12:04:16 AM
- 1201 Views
Re: Now now, there's no need to be rude.
04/07/2010 05:53:01 PM
- 985 Views
That's always upsetting. You just have to remember that some people are simply arseholes, and...
28/06/2010 11:41:22 AM
- 1023 Views
Re: I got screamed at by a motorist while riding my bicycle today
28/06/2010 03:25:22 PM
- 942 Views
Are they supposed to use sidewalks anywhere? *NM*
28/06/2010 04:58:50 PM
- 528 Views
In Sweden we often have combined bike and walking paths a few meters to the side of the road
28/06/2010 06:22:40 PM
- 984 Views
Not sure, but
28/06/2010 06:53:14 PM
- 987 Views
Thankfully I live in a very bike-friendly city, though this sort of thing has still happened to me. *NM*
28/06/2010 07:56:59 PM
- 599 Views
I'm so glad I actually READ what you said before responding.
29/06/2010 09:16:25 AM
- 1118 Views
?? I thought it was matter of COURSE that bikes weren't allowed on the highway
29/06/2010 09:27:06 AM
- 1070 Views
Should be, but it's not.
29/06/2010 09:59:35 AM
- 1061 Views
Question for you.
29/06/2010 10:22:13 AM
- 911 Views
the law says they have to to ride in single file as close to curb as is practical
29/06/2010 03:31:55 PM
- 973 Views