Active Users:1162 Time:23/11/2024 03:01:27 AM
he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though. LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM
Let's see YOU fake a unilateral face droop. Give it a shot.

And even if she wasn't clearly exhibiting a face droop, what's the safest bet for all? Let them in without hindrance, making the relatively small risk that they slip away unnoticed, OR refuse to let them into a hospital, making the large risk that the woman is really having a stroke and needs timely medical treatment and YOU denied it to her?

At least he DID let them in. Goodness knows what he would have done if she was having problems less obvious than a stroke.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Police Officer stops man from entering ER while wife is having stroke - 20/06/2010 10:08:49 PM 1337 Views
So? - 20/06/2010 11:53:33 PM 692 Views
Seriously? - 21/06/2010 12:11:17 AM 758 Views
Carrying a woman into the ER doesn't really scream "made up excuse" - 21/06/2010 12:24:30 AM 1166 Views
Time and place. - 21/06/2010 02:25:27 AM 768 Views
Plus he was carrying a woman - 21/06/2010 11:40:18 AM 813 Views
Oh please. *NM* - 21/06/2010 03:34:16 AM 324 Views
i cant even take this seriously. - 21/06/2010 04:28:12 AM 862 Views
he clearly wasn't just "making up an excuse" though. - 21/06/2010 10:59:13 AM 903 Views
unfortunately the law is on the officer's side, no matter whether he acted correctly - 21/06/2010 07:09:13 AM 695 Views
well this is,really, a drastically different situation - 21/06/2010 08:11:39 AM 755 Views
the point is, the officer is not required to show compassion, only enforce the law - 21/06/2010 11:53:51 PM 609 Views
no. a officer is NOT only required to hold up the law. - 22/06/2010 12:28:05 AM 621 Views
i'm not disagreeing with you - 22/06/2010 01:25:43 AM 734 Views
except in this case (you seem to be ignoring this) - 22/06/2010 01:35:21 AM 675 Views
At the very least the officer should have let medical personnel take the woman in for treatment - 21/06/2010 02:56:30 PM 699 Views
But... - 21/06/2010 04:58:06 PM 767 Views
"The fact is that the man broke the law" is nonsense. That's what judgment is for. - 21/06/2010 05:30:26 PM 729 Views
But you can get pulled over for going 1 mile over. - 21/06/2010 05:59:51 PM 762 Views
the thing is... - 22/06/2010 12:29:43 AM 608 Views
But then he's have to use a cell phone while driving! Another crime! *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:41:51 AM 344 Views
Not in TN *NM* - 22/06/2010 02:02:32 PM 285 Views
This is ridiculous - 22/06/2010 03:18:03 AM 742 Views
How exactly did I justify anything? Perhaps you missed the subject of my post. - 22/06/2010 02:28:21 PM 672 Views
I'm saying the fact that the law was broken is totally irrelevent, - 23/06/2010 02:15:56 AM 777 Views
How can it be even slightly irrelevant, let alone "totally" so? - 25/06/2010 03:24:19 PM 643 Views
It is sad when idiocy and a lack of judgment becomes codified into law backed with enforcement power - 21/06/2010 09:56:32 PM 1086 Views
i don't even know if I'd be happy with a lawsuit - 22/06/2010 12:31:18 AM 659 Views
The cop should be fired and fined - 23/06/2010 03:40:32 PM 635 Views
You are such a bleeding heart liberal.. - 25/06/2010 03:22:42 AM 642 Views
LOL - - 25/06/2010 03:11:47 PM 639 Views

Reply to Message