Active Users:461 Time:21/09/2024 01:18:07 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
it might be an accent thing, but i think "was" sounds horrible in that context Foxhead Send a noteboard - 14/06/2010 08:38:33 AM

"That's how bad Australia was." ?


it's too short

Reply to message
British grammar Deadsy - 14/06/2010 07:15:43 AM 550 Views
Entities (like nations and companies) are considered to be in the plural in British BlackAdder - 14/06/2010 07:38:05 AM 341 Views
You can write it either way in Britain. Rebekah - 14/06/2010 08:29:28 AM 360 Views
One thing I've been wondering ... for, oh, the last five or six hours... soilent brad - 14/06/2010 08:32:56 AM 623 Views
Kind of but not really any more. But it's still different in continental Europe. Ghavrel - 14/06/2010 08:36:40 AM 473 Views
Hmm... Long scale seems confusing soilent brad - 14/06/2010 08:49:06 AM 442 Views
It kind of depends on how you look at it. Legolas - 14/06/2010 11:09:00 AM 347 Views
Originally a billion was a million million, but we've given up on that one now. *NM* Tim - 14/06/2010 12:32:31 PM 162 Views
it might be an accent thing, but i think "was" sounds horrible in that context Foxhead - 14/06/2010 08:38:33 AM 414 Views
It's the same with club teams as well Liam - 14/06/2010 11:14:56 AM 368 Views
Singular nouns denoting groups can take plural verb agreement in British English. Tim - 14/06/2010 12:31:25 PM 372 Views
A few examples of collective nouns: Lordling - 14/06/2010 06:32:13 PM 348 Views
You can still follow the guidelines of British English... Rebekah - 14/06/2010 06:35:48 PM 329 Views
The British usually pluralise groups. Aviendha - 14/06/2010 06:55:44 PM 364 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes