Active Users:1193 Time:22/11/2024 01:44:36 PM
So? Joel Send a noteboard - 07/06/2010 10:50:49 PM
You know, the ones about stones crying out "Oh Muslim, there's a Jew behind me, come kill him" and all that crap. Turns out that they are all "end of days" type stuff, in passages detailing all the things that will supposedly happen when the Mahdi and/or Jesus return and the world ends and all (on the same level with predictions that the Muslims will fight the Turks, and with people who "wear shoes made of hair" and "broad-faced people whose faces will look like shields coated with leater". Which nobody ever mentions, of course. It's a bit like quoting from Revelations and taking it seriously.

And you know, other than those verses, you'd be hard-pressed to find anything that is really anti-Jewish or anti-Semite in either the Qur'an or the major hadith collections. Sure, there's a lot about how they don't stick to their religion and misinterpret or have falsified their own holy texts, but then that's kind of an unavoidable stance to take for someone who claims to be the final prophet. And they are blamed for having tried to kill Jesus, but obviously in that regard the Christians viewed things the same way. If you really go searching for hadiths or other stories that show something about how Muhammad treated the Jews or wanted them to be treated, you'll generally find it's quite positive, except in cases of war. There's even a hadith rebuking anti-Semitism - about how Muhammad respectfully stood up when a funeral procession passed, and after being told it was only for a Jew, said "So what, is he not a human too?"

Bottom line is that while a radical Muslim can find religious justifications for anti-Semitism if he looks hard enough and is willing to pull things out of context, he has to reach to do it. Hamas' propaganda that pretends Jews are some kind of eternal enemy of the Muslims is completely false, and as an opponent of Hamas, you should fight it, not run with it.

It's not like a holy writing becomes illegitimate just by being apocalyptic. It's either accepted or it's not. The deeper question is why such passages would be written in the first place. Of course, the promise to give Abrahams descendants Canaan is no more unique to Judaism than God telling Abraham to sacrifice his son to see if he trusts God to come through for him. There's a BIT more to the Palestinian/Israeli conflict than just kicking people off their dads land, though that certainly plays a role.
And the other bottom line is that you have to be very, very careful with making generalizations about Jewish beliefs during the two thousand years since the destruction of the Temple. If there's one thing my Jewish History class taught me, it's that those Jewish beliefs have varied wildly. As did their actions, for that matter. It is your view of history that is "rather limited" because of your misguided generalizations. One has to judge events or people by the standards and the circumstances and the knowledge of the time. It's easy to say afterwards that the Jews who followed Shabtai Zevi were stupid or gullible - because you know how his story ends. But for someone actually living in his time, it was not so easy to determine that Zevi was not the real Messiah.

Oh, I realize all of that, but the stories of conflict between Jew and Arab didn't happen in a vacuum. They may not have been universally accepted (and after the Exile that's more likely than not, since the Jews were scattered to the four winds on at least three separate occasions) but there's SOME basis there even if it was just some Jewish guy who really hated Arabs and wrote nasty things about them to disseminate to his fellow Jews.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Jacqueline Rose on the Dreyfus affair and related problems, in the LRB - 06/06/2010 11:28:14 AM 1070 Views
What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:48:16 PM 861 Views
Re: What she has to say about Dreyfus is very interesting. - 06/06/2010 04:56:32 PM 788 Views
*remains amused at the suggestion of the Dreyfus Affairs "pertinence" to "current" events* - 06/06/2010 05:14:23 PM 788 Views
I agree in part and (strongly) disagree in part. - 06/06/2010 05:40:26 PM 765 Views
"If it's an eternal struggle, how could there ever be a solution or a peace?" - 06/06/2010 06:20:39 PM 827 Views
Purim may or may not refer to a historic event. Even if it does, Haman was not likely an Arab. - 07/06/2010 12:00:05 AM 679 Views
I second your main point. - 07/06/2010 12:09:42 AM 687 Views
I don't discount that there is Arab blood in many or even most "Arabs". - 07/06/2010 12:18:32 AM 680 Views
Okay, fair enough then. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:45:19 AM 300 Views
The holiday is centuries old and real, regardless. - 07/06/2010 12:28:59 AM 767 Views
You're still missing the major point here. - 07/06/2010 12:44:08 AM 676 Views
That seems a rather limited view of history. - 07/06/2010 01:10:11 AM 780 Views
What the Hell are you going on about? - 07/06/2010 04:08:19 AM 731 Views
Oooh - 07/06/2010 11:07:43 AM 597 Views
Yeah, to whom was the claim on that land given? - 07/06/2010 10:35:42 PM 727 Views
jeez Joel... - 07/06/2010 04:24:47 AM 715 Views
No, the Persians are not Arabs. - 07/06/2010 10:09:47 PM 844 Views
I (coincidentally) stumbled across those infamous hadith passages about Jews the other day. - 07/06/2010 09:41:39 AM 760 Views
So? - 07/06/2010 10:50:49 PM 750 Views
So the relevance of apocalyptic passages is close to zero. - 07/06/2010 11:55:05 PM 708 Views
Not to mention - 08/06/2010 09:09:27 AM 647 Views
Then why are they canon? - 08/06/2010 06:25:09 PM 896 Views
are you claiming that people would pull some things out of holy text and ignore the rest? - 08/06/2010 12:16:41 PM 779 Views
*NM* - 08/06/2010 01:16:13 PM 295 Views
well, for me this just proves why we are not supposed to live among non-Jews - 06/06/2010 11:39:45 PM 859 Views
how so? - 06/06/2010 11:41:18 PM 637 Views
It reminds me of what I kept thinking as I read it. - 07/06/2010 12:51:36 AM 662 Views
couldn't get past the part where anyone who opposes Obama is a racist *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:40:07 AM 471 Views
You hallucinated? *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:39:37 AM 347 Views
No, that would've been one of the places where she should've shut up. *NM* - 08/06/2010 08:58:11 AM 284 Views
No - 08/06/2010 09:08:04 AM 643 Views
I think he's not talking about that bit, but about the very first paragraph. - 08/06/2010 09:30:21 AM 768 Views
If there was more I didn't get far enough to hear it - 08/06/2010 12:09:47 PM 628 Views
That's the problem with the speech - the large majority of what she had to say was worthwhile. - 08/06/2010 01:15:39 PM 693 Views
The problem is blatant bias - 08/06/2010 02:24:57 PM 671 Views

Reply to Message